RESUMEN
AIMS: To identify how social participation facilitates pre-registration student nurses learning and professional development using social media. DESIGN: A social survey using thematic analysis to explore Caribbean student nurses' views of social media usage from an open-ended question in a survey. METHODS: A qualitative analysis of student nurses from Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago, who completed an open-ended question in a survey. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS/FINDINGS: The three themes identified were: (1) Social media and communication; (2) Social media and self-care; and (3) Social media and learning. CONCLUSION: This paper used qualitative evidence to identify and report a new way of viewing SoMe in nursing education as a student-centred educational learning tool. SoMe can improve the effectiveness of student nurses learning, while developing fundamental skills (open-mindedness, critical thinking, professionalism and decision-making) for nursing practice. Social participation and connectivism theory are embedded in student nurses' learning journey. However, it has been used by student nurses outside the traditional university teaching and their capacity to own their personal learning. To meet the new generation of student nurses' learning needs, it is important that higher education institutions develop guidance, support and use of social media for learning to support student nurses in their education as students and also future professionals. IMPACT: This study addresses how social participation is used in social media to contribute to Caribbean student nurses' education. The main finding is the introduction of a new learning theory supporting learning using social media. This study has an impact on using social media for learning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Asunto(s)
Bachillerato en Enfermería , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Participación Social , Región del CaribeRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of the paper is to review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and manifestations of perioperative anaphylaxis (POA). We seek to review the most common culprits of POA and different diagnostic modalities for evaluation. RECENT FINDINGS: Specific IgE testing has a limited role in POA evaluation due to lack of widespread availability and low sensitivity. Basophil activation testing is complementary to skin tests and can assist NMBA sensitivity diagnosis in complex cases. In the past years, there has been an exponential increase in suspected teicoplanin allergic reactions in the European Union. Chlorhexidine is also being increasingly implicated as a culprit in POA. Multiple classes of perioperative medications cause POA. Diagnostic modalities available include skin testing with nonirritating concentrations, basophil activation tests, specific IgE, and drug provocation testing. An accurate record and critical analysis of perioperative events is more important than isolated test results. Future studies evaluating the pathophysiology of these reactions and other therapeutic strategies, such as targeting the MRGPRX2 receptor, are needed.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/terapia , Periodo Perioperatorio/efectos adversos , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
My decision to be a research student arose from my desire to add something new to the body of knowledge about the experiences of older people from black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds in hospital.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra/psicología , Geriatría/métodos , Investigación , Población Negra/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Reino Unido/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: McDonald's has sold >100 billion beef-based hamburgers worldwide with a potentially considerable health impact. This paper explores whether there would be any advantages if the next 100 billion burgers were instead plant-based burgers. METHODS: Nutrient composition of the beef hamburger patty and the McVeggie burger patty were obtained from the McDonald's website; sales data were obtained from the McDonald's customer service. RESULTS: Consuming 100 billion McDonald's beef burgers versus the same company's McVeggie burgers would provide, approximately, on average, an additional 550 million pounds of saturated fat and 1.2 billion total pounds of fat, as well as 1 billion fewer pounds of fiber, 660 million fewer pounds of protein, and no difference in calories. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the McDonald's new McVeggie burger represents a less harmful fast-food choice than the beef burger.