RESUMEN
PROBLEM: Ability to set goals and work with coaches can support individualized, self-directed learning. Understanding the focus and quality of graduating medical student and first-year resident goals and the influence of coaching on goal-setting can inform efforts to support learners through the transition from medical school to residency. APPROACH: This observational study examined goal-setting among graduating medical students and first-year residents from April 2021 to March 2022. The medical students set goals while participating in a Transition to Residency elective. The residents in internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, emergency medicine, orthopedics, and pathology set goals through meeting 1:1 with coaches. Raters assessed goals using a 3-point rubric on domains of specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and timely (i.e., SMART goal framework) and analyzed descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests, and linear regressions. OUTCOMES: Among 48 medical students, 30 (62.5%) set 108 goals for early residency. Among 134 residents, 62 (46.3%) entered goals. Residents met with coaches 2.8 times on average (range 0-8 meetings, median = 3). Goal quality was higher in residents than medical students (average score for S: 2.71 vs 2.06, P < .001; M: 2.38 vs 1.66, P < .001; A: 2.92 vs 2.64, P < .001; R: 2.94 vs 2.86, P = .002; T: 1.71 vs 1.31, P < .001). The number of coaching meetings was associated with more specific, measurable goals (specific: F [1, 1.02] = 6.56, P = .01, R2 = .10; measurable: F [1, 1.49] = 4.74, P = .03, R2 = .07). NEXT STEPS: Learners set realistic, attainable goals through the transition to residency, but the goals could be more specific, measurable, and timely. The residents set SMARTer goals, with coaching improving goal quality. Understanding how best to scaffold coaching and support goal-setting through this transition may improve trainees' self-directed learning and well-being.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Internado y Residencia , Tutoría , Obstetricia , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Ginecología/educación , Obstetricia/educación , Aprendizaje , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
Good nutrition in the early years of life is essential, yet the diets of many pre-school children in the UK are known to be poor. Understanding the decisions parents make when feeding young children is very important in determining what type and nature of interventional support may be developed to promote good nutrition. The aim of this study was to explore using qualitative methods, parental perceptions of feeding their children in order to inform the development of a nutrition intervention. Focus groups (n = 33) and individual interviews (n = 6) were undertaken with parents, most of whom were attending children's centres in two deprived populations from one urban (Islington, north London) and one rural (Cornwall) location in England. Accounts of feeding pre-school children were primarily concerned with dealing with the practicalities of modern life, in particular the cost of food and the need to manage on a restricted household budget. Time pressures, a lack of perceived knowledge and confidence in preparing food and managing conflict over food choices between family members were also strong themes. Parents commonly reported differences between how they would like to feed their children and the reality of what they were able to do in their circumstances. These findings suggest that the poor eating habits of many pre-school children may be less a case of parental ignorance but rather the product of a range of coping strategies. Designing an intervention, which helps parents to build their confidence and self-efficacy, may enable them to make positive changes to their children's diets.
Asunto(s)
Dieta/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Padres , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Preescolar , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Preferencias Alimentarias , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Estado Nutricional , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Good nutrition in the early years of life is vitally important for a child's development, growth and health. Children's diets in the United Kingdom are known to be poor, particularly among socially disadvantaged groups, and there is a need for timely and appropriate interventions that support parents to improve the diets of young children. The Medical Research Council has highlighted the importance of conducting developmental and exploratory research prior to undertaking full-scale trials to evaluate complex interventions, but have provided very limited detailed guidance on the conduct of these initial phases of research. This paper describes the initial developmental stage and the conduct of an exploratory randomised controlled trial undertaken to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a family-centred early years' nutrition intervention. Choosing Healthy Eating when Really Young (CHERRY) is a programme for families with children aged 18 months to 5 years, delivered in children's centres in one urban (Islington) and one rural (Cornwall) location in the United Kingdom. In the development stage, a mixed-methods approach was used to investigate the nature of the problem and options for support. A detailed review of the evidence informed the theoretical basis of the study and the creation of a logic model. In the feasibility and pilot testing stage of the exploratory trial, 16 children's centres, with a sample of 394 families were recruited onto the study. We hope that the methodology, which we present in this paper, will inform and assist other researchers in conducting community-based, exploratory nutrition research in early years settings.
Asunto(s)
Dieta , Estado Nutricional , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Recuerdo Mental , Análisis Multinivel , Evaluación Nutricional , Proyectos Piloto , Tamaño de la Porción , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the experience and attitudes of dental professionals towards smoking cessation and, in particular, to explore perceived barriers limiting their involvement in this area of practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A combined quantitative and qualitative methodology was employed in South Essex, an area in South East England. In the first phase a questionnaire survey was conducted with all general dental practitioners on the South Essex Health Authority dental list to assess their current involvement in smoking cessation and their general attitudes to this area of clinical care. In the second phase, ten focus group interviews were conducted with dental teams to uncover in greater depth views towards smoking cessation and, in particular, the barriers preventing progress. RESULTS: A 60% response rate (n = 149) was achieved for the postal questionnaire and 52 dental team members participated in the focus groups. The questionnaire survey revealed that the majority of the sample reported asking their patients about smoking (90%) and recording this information in their clinical notes (75%). However, a relatively low number indicated active involvement in assisting smokers to stop (30%) or referring them for more detailed support (24%). The focus groups uncovered a range of fundamental barriers limiting greater involvement in smoking cessation. The key issues included a fatalistic and negative concept of prevention; perceived lack of relevance of smoking cessation to dentistry; patient hostility; and organizational factors within the practice setting. CONCLUSION: Future action to encourage the provision of smoking cessation in dental practices needs to address the range of barriers that currently limit involvement in this area of clinical practice.