Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 18(9): E247-E252, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190174

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery for localized prostate cancer offers a greater range of motion attributed to the EndoWrist instruments. Postoperative outcomes are linked to the quality of vesico-urethral anastomosis. Trainees frequently complain of suturing difficulty in a back-handed fashion. We aimed to analyze wrist motion using the DaVinci simulator. We hypothesized that using the thumb and index finger would allow superior surgical proficiency when compared to the middle finger. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we recruited 42 medical students in one academic medical center. Students were randomly assigned to start with their thumb and index finger (1&2) or thumb and middle finger (1&3). Three standardized modules were used with nine metrics calculated, including: score, total time, economy of motion, efficiency score, collisions, inaccurate puncture, wound approximation, out of view, and penalty subtotal. Statistical analysis of the metrics was calculated using SPSS. RESULTS: Three metrics were found to have differences between the finger placement of 1&3 compared to 1&2. The number of collisions, wound approximation, and penalty score where 1&3 were used had a lower score in each. The number of collisions was 5.7 less in the 1&3 finger placement (p=0.046). This metric was found to have statistically significant differences between finger placement where 1&3 had a lower score compared to 1&2. The wound approximation score was 0.2 points lower when using the 1&3 placement (p=0.075). Lastly, the penalty assigned was 6.5 points lower when using 1&3 (p=0.069). CONCLUSIONS: Although finger placement did not affect the overall score of the completed simulation, instrument collisions and unnecessary wound complications may lead to adverse outcomes when using 1&2 despite offering a wider range of motion. This may be due to decreased comfort in hand position. Trainees may be able to improve the effectiveness of their vesico-urethral anastomosis during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

2.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 16(9): E479-E483, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426789

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Retained ureteral stents may constitute a technical challenge. The purpose of this study was to analyze the patient population with retained ureteral stents with regards to stent sizes to better understand if these factors could play a pivotal role in their encrustation. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent multimodal surgical procedures for the removal of retained ureteral stents from 2010-2018. The primary outcomes analyzed were ureteral stent length and diameter, location of stent placement, and patients' demographics as potential etiologies for encrustation. RESULTS: We included 30 patients with 32 encrusted ureteral stents and 37 patients with 46 forgotten non-retained ureteral stents. Indications for stenting included urolithiasis, malignancy, pregnancy, ureteral stricture, and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Stent diameters ranged from 6-8.5 Fr. Stent lengths ranged from 22-30 cm, and multilength stents were used too. Smaller diameter stents were less likely to be retained when compared to larger diameter stents (>6 Fr) (p=0.002). Overall stent length was not found to be significant (p=0.251); however, the difference in stent surface area differed by over 1 cm (p<0.001). Patients who were uninsured were more likely to have retained stents (p=0.003). Patients who reside with longer commuting distance to the main academic medical center were more likely to have retained stents (p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Retained ureteral stents could be avoided. Taking into consideration ureteral anatomical variation among patients, smaller diameter stents and smaller surface area may prevent encrustation. Uninsured patients with farther distance to seek medical care and females are the most at risk.

3.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 40(7): 1811-1819, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34298584

RESUMEN

AIMS: Although abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) is considered the gold standard for surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse, the open surgical approach has significant morbidity. We aim to compare anatomic and functional outcomes in women receiving either robotic-assisted sacral colpopexy (RSC) or ASC for post-hysterectomy prolapse. METHODS: We present a retrospective chart review of all women who underwent ASC and RSC at our institution and had 12-month follow-up (FU). Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) staging was assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Perioperative and demographic details were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: One hundred twenty four women underwent RSC (mean age 63, median FU 16 months). Those in the ASC group (n = 144) were statistically younger (mean age 60) and had longer FU (median 60 months). Both median day of successful voiding trial and discharge day significantly favored RSC. There were no Clavien Grade IV/V complications for either procedure and three RSC procedures were converted to ASC. Both approaches were associated with a significant improvement in POP-Q stage at FU, with few women requiring additional surgery. Overall, 76% of women in each group were dry from stress urinary incontinence. Improvement in storage and emptying indices, dyspareunia, and quality of life measures was observed after both approaches. CONCLUSION: RSC demonstrates good support of significant vaginal vault prolapse at medium term FU, with shorter hospital stays and low complication rates. Close FU after RSC over a longer period will be needed to fully assess durability of both functional and anatomic outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos
4.
Investig Clin Urol ; 61(6): 565-572, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32985142

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Previous studies have noted increased utilization of perioperative chemotherapy over time. The goal of this study was to determine trends in perioperative chemotherapy use within a contemporary population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with cT2-4N0M0 urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer from 2011 to 2015 and underwent subsequent radical cystectomy. We retrospectively analyzed factors associated with perioperative chemotherapy and evaluated overall treatment trends in the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Linear regression, logistic regression, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed. RESULTS: In total, 7,101 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. The use of perioperative chemotherapy increased from 46.4% in 2011 to 57.2% in 2015 (p=0.003). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use increased from 22.9% to 32.3% (p=0.007) over the time period analyzed, while adjuvant chemotherapy use experienced no significant change (23.5% to 24.9%, p=0.182). Logistic regression demonstrated that increased age and Charlson Comorbidity Index were predictors of not receiving chemotherapy (p<0.05), while those with increasing T stage, income above $48,000, and insurance other than Medicaid or Medicare were more likely to receive perioperative chemotherapy (p<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had the best 5-year overall survival at 48.3% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (42.6%) or no chemotherapy (37.8%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The increasing use of perioperative chemotherapy noted in prior studies has continued through 2015. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to drive this increase while adjuvant chemotherapy utilization remains unchanged. Clinical and socioeconomic factors affect utilization of perioperative chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/tendencias , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Cistectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía
5.
J Robot Surg ; 14(3): 447-454, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31456083

RESUMEN

Partial nephrectomy is the mainstay of treatment for localized kidney cancer. A proportion of patients are upstaged post-operatively to locally advanced disease (pT3a). We aimed to identify the incidence of upstaging to pT3a during partial nephrectomy and its relationship to a robotic approach. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with cT1M0 disease between 2010 and 2015 who underwent an open or robotic partial nephrectomy with final stage pT1-3a. Our primary outcome was rate of upstaging to pT3a in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy and secondary outcomes were stage migration, rate of positive margins, and overall survival (OS). The relationship between open and robotic surgery was examined. Logistical regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. Of 68,976 patients identified, 5.9% of patients were upstaged from cT1 to pT3a post-operatively. The incidence of upstaging to pT3a disease has increased from 5.7% in 2010 to 6.9% in 2015. Similarly, the proportion of patients undergoing a robotic approach is also increasing (31.6-64.4%); however, a robotic approach is not associated with pT3a upstaging on multivariable analysis. The probability of being upstaged was significantly proportional to increasing tumor size (OR 2.634-11.641, p < 0.05). pT3a disease was associated with a significant increase in positive margins (10.7% vs 5.0%, p < 0.001). Interestingly, pT3a patients with positive margin had worsened survival (5-year OS 75.5% vs 65.9%, p < 0.001). A robotic surgical approach to partial nephrectomy does not increase risk of upstaging to pT3a disease. Those who are upstaged have increased risk of positive margins and associated risk of decreased survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Resultados Negativos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tasa de Supervivencia
6.
Can J Urol ; 26(5): 9938-9944, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31629443

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the overall survival and pathologic downstaging effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with stage II-IV upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma undergoing definitive surgical resection (nephroureterectomy) from 2004-2015. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. Cohorts were stratified by receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to evaluate overall survival. Logistic regression was used to predict the odds of pathologic downstaging to non-invasive disease (< pT2). Propensity score matched analysis was performed between groups. RESULTS: A total of 3634 patients were identified with non-metastatic stage II-IV disease undergoing surgical resection; 3364 received no chemotherapy and 270 received NAC. Patients undergoing NAC had a 10.9% rate of downstaging to non-invasive disease (OR 6.35, p < 0.001). Moreover, on Kaplan-Meier analysis, median survival was 27.3 months and 44.8 months for no chemotherapy versus NAC, respectively (log-rank, p = 0.001). Cox regression for death also revealed benefits for receiving NAC (HR 0.67, p < 0.001). Findings were confirmed on propensity score matching (532 matched patients). After matching, Cox regression for death noted improvement with neoadjuvant as compared to no chemotherapy (HR 0.61, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases likelihood of downstaging to non-invasive disease in patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. Chemotherapy also provides an overall survival benefit in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Ureterales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ureterales/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nefrectomía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Ureterales/cirugía
7.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 51(10): 1755-1762, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31346955

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our objective was to determine perioperative variables associated with 30-day readmission to the index operative hospital after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and subsequent survival outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study utilizing the United States National Cancer Database from 2004-2015. All clinical stages undergoing radical cystectomy were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included clinical suspicion of nodal disease, metastasis, or preoperative radiation therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was used for 30-day readmission risk to the index hospital. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regressions were used for survival outcomes. RESULTS: 31,147 patients were identified and stratified by 30-day readmission (n = 2628) or no readmission (n = 28,519). Thirty-day readmission to the index surgery hospital was 8.4%. Groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, race, income, facility type, insurance, length of hospital stay, and pathologic stage. There were significantly more patients with higher Charlson comorbidity score in the readmission cohort. On logistic regression analysis, increasing Charlson score was the only predictor of 30-day readmission (OR 1.39-1.73, p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality rate was 7.2% overall (7.0% no readmission vs 9.9% 30-day readmission, p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis for mortality revealed increasing age (HR 1.04), higher Charlson score (HR 1.42-1.85), readmission within 30 days (HR 1.38) and pathologic stage pT ≥ 2 (HR 1.88-7.09, all p < 0.001) as independent predictors of 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing comorbidity is a strong predictor of readmission to the index surgery hospital after radical cystectomy. Readmission is associated with worsened mortality at 90 days.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Correlación de Datos , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA