RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite deleterious biomechanics associated with injury, particularly as it pertains to load carriage, there is limited research on the association between physical demands and variables captured with wearable sensors. While inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used as surrogate measures of ground reaction force (GRF) variables, it is unclear if these data are sensitive to military-specific task demands. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can wearable sensors characterise physical load and demands placed on individuals in different load, speed and grade conditions? METHODS: Data were collected on 20 individuals who were self-reportedly free from current injury, recreationally active, and capable of donning 23â¯kg in the form of a weighted vest. Each participant walked and ran on flat, uphill (+6â¯%) and downhill (-6â¯%) without and with load (23â¯kg). Data were collected synchronously from optical motion capture (OMC) and IMUs placed on the distal limb and the pelvis. Data from an 8-second window was used to generate a participant-based mean of OMC and IMU variables of interest. Repeated Measures ANOVA was used to measure main and interaction effects of load, speed, and grade. Simple linear regression was used to elucidate a relationship between OMC measures and estimated metabolic cost (EMC) to IMU measures. RESULTS: Load reduces foot and pelvic accelerations (p<0.001) but elevate signal attenuation per step (p=0.044). Conversely, attenuation per kilometre is lowered with the addition of load (p=0.017). Uphill had the lowest attenuation per step (p=0.003) and kilometre (p≤0.033) in walking, while downhill had the greatest attenuation per step (p≤0.002) and per kilometre (p≤0.004). Attenuation measures are inconsistently moderately related to limb negative work (R≤0.57). EMC is moderately positively related to unloaded running (R≥0.39), and moderately negatively related to walking with and without load (R≤-0.52). SIGNIFICANCE: While load reduces peak accelerations at both the pelvis and foot. However, it may increase demand on the lower extremity to attenuate the signal between the two sensors with each step, while attenuation over time reduces with load.
Asunto(s)
Soporte de Peso , Humanos , Masculino , Soporte de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Femenino , Caminata/fisiología , Adulto Joven , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Carrera/fisiología , Acelerometría , Marcha/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The ability to estimate lower-extremity mechanics in real-world scenarios may untether biomechanics research from a laboratory environment. This is particularly important for military populations where outdoor ruck marches over variable terrain and the addition of external load are cited as leading causes of musculoskeletal injury As such, this study aimed to examine (1) the validity of a minimal IMU sensor system for quantifying lower-extremity kinematics during treadmill walking and running compared with optical motion capture (OMC) and (2) the sensitivity of this IMU system to kinematic changes induced by load, grade, or a combination of the two. The IMU system was able to estimate hip and knee range of motion (ROM) with moderate accuracy during walking but not running. However, SPM analyses revealed IMU and OMC kinematic waveforms were significantly different at most gait phases. The IMU system was capable of detecting kinematic differences in knee kinematic waveforms that occur with added load but was not sensitive to changes in grade that influence lower-extremity kinematics when measured with OMC. While IMUs may be able to identify hip and knee ROM during gait, they are not suitable for replicating lab-level kinematic waveforms.
Asunto(s)
Articulación de la Rodilla , Caminata , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Marcha , Rango del Movimiento Articular , HumanosRESUMEN
The HumanTrak captures human movement through markerless motion tracking and can be a crucial tool in military physical screening. Reliability was examined in eighteen healthy participants who completed shoulder and hip ROM, and dynamic tasks in three body armour conditions. Generally, for all conditions, good to excellent reliability was observed in shoulder abduction and flexion, hip abduction and adduction, and dynamic squats knee and hip flexion (ICC ≥ 0.75 excluding outliers). Shoulder adduction and hip flexion demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability (ICC ≥ 0.50). Shoulder and hip extension and the drop jump were unreliable (ICC: 0.10-0.94, 0.15-0.89, and 0.30-0.82, respectively) due to the large distribution of ICC scores. Tasks with ROM values ≥ 100° involving movement towards or perpendicular to the HumanTrak camera tended to have greater reliability than movements moving away from the camera and out of the perpendicular plane regardless if body armour was worn.Practitioner summary: The HumanTrak analyses ROM in a time-efficient manner in a military setting. This study established that shoulder abduction and adduction (no body armour) and shoulder, hip, and knee flexion were the most reliable measurement for all conditions. Further work is required for movements across different planes.Abbreviations: ROM: range of motion; NBA: no body armour; BA: unloaded body armour; BA9: body armour with 9 kg; RGB: red, green, blue; ICC: intra-class correlation; SEM: standard error of measurement; MDC: minimal detectable change: MSE: mean square error; r: pearson correlations; N: sample size.