RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA-PS) classification system are two commonly used tools for preoperative risk assessment. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of RCRI compared to the ASA-PS classification system in preoperative risk assessment for pulmonary and cardiac problems among non-cardiothoracic surgery patients admitted at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study design conducted from August 2022 to April 2023 among 184 patients of 18 years and above admitted at MNH for elective non-cardiothoracic surgery. Data Analysis was conducted using STATA software version 16. Means and standard deviations were used to summarize continuous data. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize categorical data. The logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to determine the correlation between variables. RESULTS: The majority of patients (43.3%) had an RCRI score of 1 point, and 39.9% were classified as ASA class 1. Patients in ASA classes 3 and 4 had higher odds of developing cardiac and pulmonary complications (AUC = 0.75 and 0.77, respectively). Patients with an RCRI score of 2 or ≥ 3 points were also more likely to experience cardiac and pulmonary complications (AUC = 0.73 and 0.72, respectively). There was no significant difference in the predictive ability of the two tools. Both RCRI and ASA-PS classification systems were equally effective in predicting these complications. CONCLUSION: Both the RCRI and the ASA-PS classification system demonstrated good predictive ability for cardiac and pulmonary complications among patients undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Adulto , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) is helpful in preventing patients from developing Surgical Site Infections (SSI). In Mbujimayi, the documentation on the practice of SAP is outdated and inadequate. The last study was conducted more than 5 years ago. This study aims at assessing the compliance of the practice of antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical and obstetrics-gynecology departments of the Bonzola Zonal Referral Hospital (BZRH) compared to the international standards. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted from March 2020 to March 2021 involving 324 surgical patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis. Interventions were assessed as "compliant" if all the variables individually complied with the criteria for antibiotic prophylaxis use. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Compliance was found to be 87.35% for the indication for administration; 0.31% for the choice of the molecule; 3.65% for the time of the first administration; none for the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Therefore, the overall compliance was nil. This study shows a significant gap when the current practice in Mbujimayi town is compared to the recommendations of international societies. CONCLUSION: SAP is often indicated in accordance with international recommendations in Mbujimayi. However, the choice of the molecule, the dosage, the time of first administration and the duration of SAP deviate from them. Thus, the compliance of SAP is nil.