Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 7832, 2024 Sep 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39244569

RESUMEN

Despite the increasing burden of dengue, the regional emergence of the virus in Kenya has not been examined. This study investigates the genetic structure and regional spread of dengue virus-2 in Kenya. Viral RNA from acutely ill patients in Kenya was enriched and sequenced. Six new dengue-2 genomes were combined with 349 publicly available genomes and phylogenies used to infer gene flow between Kenya and other countries. Analyses indicate two dengue-2 Cosmopolitan genotype lineages circulating in Kenya, linked to recent outbreaks in coastal Kenya and Burkina Faso. Lineages circulating in Western, Southern, and Eastern Africa exhibiting similar evolutionary features are also reported. Phylogeography suggests importation of dengue-2 into Kenya from East and Southeast Asia and bidirectional geneflow. Additional lineages circulating in Africa are also imported from East and Southeast Asia. These findings underscore how intermittent importations from East and Southeast Asia drive dengue-2 circulation in Kenya and Africa more broadly.


Asunto(s)
Virus del Dengue , Dengue , Evolución Molecular , Genoma Viral , Epidemiología Molecular , Filogenia , Filogeografía , ARN Viral , Virus del Dengue/genética , Virus del Dengue/clasificación , Dengue/epidemiología , Dengue/virología , Humanos , Kenia/epidemiología , África Oriental/epidemiología , ARN Viral/genética , Genoma Viral/genética , Genotipo , Flujo Génico , Brotes de Enfermedades
2.
Parasit Vectors ; 13(1): 499, 2020 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33004074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aedes aegypti is an efficient vector of several arboviruses of public health importance, including Zika and dengue. Currently vector management is the only available avenue for disease control. Development of efficient vector control strategies requires a thorough understanding of vector ecology. In this study, we identified households that are consistently productive for Ae. aegypti pupae and determined the ecological and socio-demographic factors associated with the persistence and abundance of pupae in households in rural and urban Kenya. METHODS: We collected socio-demographic, environmental and entomological data monthly from July 2014 to June 2018 from 80 households across four sites in Kenya. Pupae count data were collected via entomological surveillance of households and paired with socio-demographic and environmental data. We calculated pupal persistence within a household as the number of months of pupal presence within a year. We used spatially explicit generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) to identify the risk factors for pupal abundance, and a logistic regression to identify the risk factors for pupal persistence in households. RESULTS: The median number of months of pupal presence observed in households was 4 and ranged from 0 to 35 months. We identified pupal persistence in 85 house-years. The strongest risk factors for high pupal abundance were the presence of bushes or tall grass in the peri-domicile area (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.13-2.28), open eaves (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.33-4.95) and high habitat counts (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.21-1.66). The main risk factors for pupal persistence were the presence of bushes or tall grass in the peri-domicile (OR: 4.20, 95% CI: 1.42-12.46) and high number of breeding sites (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.03-4.58). CONCLUSIONS: We observed Ae. aegypti pupal persistence at the household level in urban and rural and in coastal and inland Kenya. High counts of potential breeding containers, vegetation in the peri-domicile area and the presence of eaves were strongly associated with increased risk of pupal persistence and abundance. Targeting households that exhibit pupal persistence alongside the risk factors for pupal abundance in vector control interventions may result in more efficient use of limited resources.


Asunto(s)
Aedes/fisiología , Mosquitos Vectores/fisiología , Pupa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Aedes/crecimiento & desarrollo , Distribución Animal , Animales , Ecosistema , Entomología , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Kenia , Masculino , Control de Mosquitos , Mosquitos Vectores/crecimiento & desarrollo , Pupa/fisiología , Población Rural
3.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(6): e0008362, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32559197

RESUMEN

Arboviruses are among the most important emerging pathogens due to their increasing public health impact. In Kenya, continued population growth and associated urbanization are conducive to vector spread in both urban and rural environments, yet mechanisms of viral amplification in vector populations is often overlooked when assessing risks for outbreaks. Thus, the characterization of local arbovirus circulation in mosquito populations is imperative to better inform risk assessments and vector control practices. Aedes species mosquitoes were captured at varying stages of their life cycle during different seasons between January 2014 and May 2016 at four distinct sites in Kenya, and tested for chikungunya (CHIKV), dengue (DENV) and Zika (ZIKV) viruses by RT-PCR. CHIKV was detected in 45 (5.9%) and DENV in 3 (0.4%) mosquito pools. No ZIKV was detected. Significant regional variation in prevalence was observed, with greater frequency of CHIKV on the coast. DENV was detected exclusively on the coast. Both viruses were detected in immature mosquitoes of both sexes, providing evidence of transovarial transmission of these arboviruses in local mosquitoes. This phenomenon may be driving underlying viral maintenance that may largely contribute to periodic re-emergence among humans in Kenya.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Chikungunya/transmisión , Virus Chikungunya/aislamiento & purificación , Culicidae/virología , Virus del Dengue/aislamiento & purificación , Dengue/transmisión , Aedes/fisiología , Aedes/virología , Animales , Arbovirus , Fiebre Chikungunya/epidemiología , Fiebre Chikungunya/virología , Culicidae/fisiología , Dengue/epidemiología , Dengue/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Kenia/epidemiología , Estadios del Ciclo de Vida , Masculino , Virus Zika , Infección por el Virus Zika/virología
4.
Parasit Vectors ; 10(1): 331, 2017 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28701194

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aedes aegypti, the principal vector for dengue and other emerging arboviruses, breeds preferentially in various man-made and natural container habitats. In the absence of vaccine, epidemiological surveillance and vector control remain the best practices for preventing dengue outbreaks. Effective vector control depends on a good understanding of larval and adult vector ecology of which little is known in Kenya. In the current study, we sought to characterize breeding habitats and establish container productivity profiles of Ae. aegypti in rural and urban sites in western and coastal Kenya. METHODS: Twenty sentinel houses in each of four study sites (in western and coastal Kenya) were assessed for immature mosquito infestation once a month for a period of 24 months (June 2014 to May 2016). All water-holding containers in and around the households were inspected for Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae. RESULTS: Collections were made from a total of 22,144 container visits: Chulaimbo (7575) and Kisumu (8003) in the west, and from Msambweni (3199) and Ukunda (3367) on the coast. Of these, only 4-5.6% were positive for Ae. aegypti immatures. In all four sites, significantly more positive containers were located outdoors than indoors. A total of 17,537 Ae. aegypti immatures were sampled from 10 container types. The most important habitat types were buckets, drums, tires, and pots, which produced over 75% of all the pupae. Key outdoor containers in the coast were buckets, drums and tires, which accounted for 82% of the pupae, while pots and tires were the only key containers in the western region producing 70% of the pupae. Drums, buckets and pots were the key indoor containers, producing nearly all of the pupae in the coastal sites. No pupae were collected indoors in the western region. The coastal region produced significantly more Ae. aegypti immatures than the western region both inside and outside the sentinel houses. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that productive Ae. aegypti larval habitats are abundant outdoors and that only a few containers produce a majority of the pupae. Although the numbers were lower, productive habitats were detected within households. Targeting source reduction efforts towards these productive containers both inside and outside homes is likely to be a cost-effective way to reduce arboviral transmission in these regions.


Asunto(s)
Aedes/fisiología , Dengue/transmisión , Brotes de Enfermedades , Insectos Vectores/fisiología , Control de Mosquitos , Aedes/virología , Animales , Cruzamiento , Dengue/virología , Ecología , Ecosistema , Femenino , Insectos Vectores/virología , Kenia/epidemiología , Larva , Masculino , Pupa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA