RESUMEN

Before kidney transplantation, recipients are routinely screened for preformed antibodies and prospective crossmatches. In this study, we compared prospective Luminex donor-specific crossmatches (LumXm) with the levels of identified, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). LumXm was performed for 108 patient sera, 84 of which were positive for preformed antibodies and 24 of which were negative. Although LumXm can detect class I DSAs (anti-A and anti-B) with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) as low as 2300, the assay has a 'grey zone' for MFIs up to 4000 with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 100%. LumXm can detect a class II DSA (anti-DRB1) with an MFI as low as 1300 and a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 99%. However, these correlations were obtained with two precautions: autocrossmatching and single-antigen bead assay with denaturing buffer were performed in discordant cases. Moreover, LumXm failed to detect anti-Cw and anti-DP in the 10 cases studied. LumXm, therefore, displays certain discrepancies with respect to single-bead assays--especially for antibodies with a low MFI. Unfortunately, LumXm has a low sensitivity for anti-A and anti-B class I antibodies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen, 145 renal recipients were prospectively randomized to receive either sirolimus (n = 71) or cyclosporine (CsA; n = 74). All patients received polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (6 months). The primary endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly different at 12 months comparing sirolimus- and CsA-treated patients (60 +/- 27 vs. 57 +/- 21 mL/min). At 12 months, patient and graft survival, incidence of biopsy-proven rejection and rates of steroid withdrawal were not statistically different (97% vs. 97%; 90% vs. 93%; 14.3% vs. 8.6% and 82.8% vs. 84.1%, respectively). Delayed and slow graft function (SGF) was not significantly different (18.6% vs. 12.3% and 11.4% vs. 13.7%, respectively). In patients who remained on treatment according to protocol at 12 months, eGFR was significantly higher with sirolimus (69 +/- 19 vs. 60 +/- 14 mL/min, p = 0.01). Overall study drug discontinuation rates were 28.2% with sirolimus and 14.9% with CsA. Adverse events (wound complications, mouth ulcers, diarrhea, hypokalemia, bronchopneumonia) and proteinuria >0.5 g/24h (38.8% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in sirolimus-treated patients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections were significantly less frequent with sirolimus (6% vs. 23%, p < 0.01). A CNI-free regimen using sirolimus-MMF can achieve excellent renal function, but patients on sirolimus experienced a high rate of adverse events and study drug discontinuation.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To check wether the deleterious effect of enalaprilat administered before unilateral caroid ligation in the gerbil reported by Fernandez et al. (J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 24: 937) is not a molecule specific effect but an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor class effect. DESIGN AND METHOD: Survival rate of gerbils (an animal with incomplete Willis hexagona) was measured after unilateral carotid ligation with preadministration (2 hours before by gavage) of saline (0.75 ml) (n = 37); losartan (20 mg/kg) (n = 37), enalaparil (10 mg/kg) (n = 37); a combination of losartan and enalapril at the same dose (n = 37); and of captopril (75 mg/kg) (n = 35). RESULTS: The survival rate of the gerbils 72 hours after carotid ligation was 65% in control, 62% in losartan, 30% in enalapril, 32% in enalapril + losartan, and 32% in captopril groups. Statistical analysis (log rank test) of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves over 72 hours showed no difference between losartan and controls nor between the various groups treated with ACEI. However survival was significantly lower in the ACEI groups than in the group treated by losartan alone (p < 0.02) or controls (p < 0.02). Intraaortic mean arterial pressure was measured in 6 controls, 6 animals treated with losartan and 6 other treated with enalapril. It was comparable in the losartan and enalapril treated animals (65 +/- 2 mm Hg vs 64 +/- 2) but significantly lower than in the controls (77 +/- 2 mmHg) (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to oral preadministration of enalapril and captopril that of losartan does not increase the mortality of the gerbil after unilateral carotid ligation in spite of the same decrease in systemic blood pressure. Although a lower mortality than in controls was not observed with losartan as in the princeps study of Fernandez, these data are consistent with the demonstration by this author that angiotensin II plays a critical protective role in acute ischemia probably by promoting collateral circulation recruitment through non-AT1 receptors stimulation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in a complex mechanism that serves to preserve the blood supply to organs so that they can maintain cellular function. Angiotensin II exerts this effect, independently of the blood pressure generated, through two time-related events: a fast opening of the reserve collateral circulation and a much slower response of new vessel formation or angiogenesis. This effect is observed in rats with ligation of the abdominal aorta and in gerbils with abrupt or progressive unilateral carotid artery ligation. Inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) or the angiotensin II receptor represses this effect, and it appears that it is mediated through a non-AT1 receptor site of angiotensin II. Many tumors, both benign and malignant, express renin and angiotensin. It seems that the stimulating action of angiotensin II on angiogenesis could also be involved in preserving the blood supply to tumor cells. Administration of converting enzyme inhibitors increases survival and decreases tumor size in tumor-bearing rats. These observations support the hypothesis that the RAS, directly or indirectly, is involved in situations in which the restoration of blood supply is critical for the viability of cells and that it is present not only in normal but also in pathological conditions such as tumors. In view of the ubiquitous presence of renins and angiotensins, it is also likely to be involved in other conditions, such as inflammation, arthritis, diabetic retinopathy, and retrolental fibroplasia, among others in which angiogenesis is prominent. In addition, angiotensin II could be involved, through the counterbalance of the AT1 and AT2 receptors, in the rarefaction of blood vessels as an etiologic component of essential hypertension.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Previous studies have shown that angiotensin II (Ang II), by mediating rapid recruitment of collateral circulation, has a protective effect in the setting of acute ischaemia. In an experimental model of acute cerebral ischaemia in the gerbil, Fernandez et al. have reported that the mechanism of the protective effect of Ang 11 is blood pressure (BP)-independent, and that the AT1-receptor antagonist, losartan, but not the ACE inhibitor (ACE-I),enalapril, decreases mortality following unilateral carotid artery ligation. The aim of this study was to examine there producibility of the respective effects of losartan and enalapril, and to verify that these differential effects are drug class-related. Acute cerebral ischaemia was induced in anaesthetised gerbils bv unilateral carotid ligation. The effect of pretreatment with two different ACE-I(enalapril and lisinopril), and two different AT1-receptor antagonists (losartan and candesartan), administered orally or intravenously, on mortality were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival curves at day three were analysed bv a log-rank test. Pretreatment with both enalapril and lisinopril significantly decreased survival at day three compared with controls, while the AT1-receptor antagonists losartan and candesartan, despite similarly lowering BP, did not increase mortality. Coadministration of losartan and enalapril increased mortality to the same extent as enalapril alone. This study confirms that Ang II contributes to protective mechanisms against acute cerebral ischaemia through non AT1-receptor-mediated, BP-independent effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is well established that prednisone above 7.5 mg/day may induce osteopenia in association with decreased bone formation. In contrast, the effect of cyclosporine on bone remodeling and bone mineral density (BMD) is controversial. Multiple confounding factors explain this controversy, especially after renal transplantation. METHODS: Fifty-two renal transplanted patients never exposed to aluminum while on dialysis were selected because they had no rejection and no hypercalcemia for 24 months while being treated with low dose prednisone/cyclosporine A (daily dose at 10 mg and 4.8 mg/kg, respectively, beyond 3 months). Bone remodeling markers (BRMs; plasma osteocalcin, bone and total alkaline phosphatases for formation, and urinary pyridinolines for resorption) were sequentially measured together with plasma creatinine, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 25 OH vitamin D and cyclosporine from day 0 to 24 months. BMD was measured at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months by quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) at the lumbar spine and by double-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at this site, as well as at the femoral neck, radius shaft, and ultradistal (UD) radius. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of creatinine, PTH, and 25 OH vitamin D initially decreased and stabilized beyond three months at 137 micromol/L, 1.5 the upper limit of normal (ULN) and 11 ng/mL, respectively. All BRM increased significantly above the ULN at six months and then decreased. The BMD Z score at three months was low at all sites measured by DEXA and QCT. Follow-up measurements showed stability of absolute value and of Z score at all sites measured by DEXA. A comparison of the lumbar QCT Z score, which was available in 42 patients at 3 and 24 months, showed an increase in 28 and a decrease in 14, so that the increase for the whole group was significant (P < 0.04). Compared with patients with a decreased Z score, those with an increased Z score had significantly higher cyclosporine and lower prednisone dosages and a greater BRM increase at six months, whereas age, sex ratio, and plasma creatinine, PTH and 25 OH vitamin D were comparable and stable from months 3 through 24. The mean trough level of cyclosporine for the first six months was positively correlated to osteocalcin and total alkaline phosphatase increase at six months, and both bone formation and resorption marker increases were significantly correlated to the lumbar QCT Z score increase at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Combined low-dose prednisone and cyclosporine immunosuppression are associated with a stabilization of BMD measured at all sites with DEXA 3 to 24 months after renal transplantation and with a prevention of age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone, as shown by the significant increase in lumbar spine QCT Z score. It is suggested that cyclosporine, together with the decrease of prednisone dosage but independent of renal function, PTH, and vitamin D status, contributes to a transient stimulation of bone remodeling at six months, which counterbalances the deleterious effect of prednisone on bone formation and BMD.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In contrast with the expected results, the Captopril Prevention Project study has found that the relative risk of stroke was greater by 25% in patients treated with ACEI than in patients receiving the conventional diuretics +/- betablockers regimen (Hanson et al. ISH Amsterdam, June 98). This difference persisted after adjustment for the initial differences of blood pressure levels between the groups after randomisation. This does not mean that ACEI would worsen the risk of stroke when compared to a placebo, since a potent protective effect of diuretics and betablockers on the relative risk of stroke has long been demonstrated. Nonetheless, these results suggest that for a similar blood pressure lowering effect, conventional therapy is more effective than ACEI to prevent stroke. This finding, in discrepancy with the current prevailing opinion that ACEI have emerged as the most effective preventive treatment to reduce cardiovascular morbidity, is regarded as surprising by the investigators. However, a number of animal experimental data may help to envisage the complete inhibition of angiotensin II formation as a two-edged sword, because of the multiplicity of its receptors mediating different, and even opposite effects. In a series of experimental studies in mammals, the group of Fernandez has provided a bundle of observations suggesting that angiotensin II contributes to early reperfusion following acute ischemia by enabling the recruitment of pre-existing collateral vascularisation, an effect mediated via the stimulation of non-AT1 receptors (possibly AT2). Indeed, the worsening of stroke in the gerbil after incomplete ligation of the carotid by pre-treatment with ACEI had been demonstrated by these authors (J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab, 1988; 24:937), and they further show that pre-administration of losartan significantly reduced the ischemic brain damage and the mortality induced by the abrupt ligation of one carotid, but that this preventive effect of losartan was abolished if enalapril was co-administrated (J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 24:937). The first available clinical data on stroke risk with ACEI reported in the CPP study, showing a less effective prevention of stroke with ACEI than diuretics supports the hypothesis that similar mechanism may also prevail in humans, and lead us to propose to discuss the rationale for a large multicentric trial aiming to compare the protective effect of ARAT1 and ACEI on the risk of recurrence of stroke.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The respective contribution of sex, type of nephropathy, degree of proteinuria, blood pressure, protein and sodium daily intakes, blood lipid profile, protidemia, hemoglobinemia, acidosis and CaPO4 product on the rate of renal failure progression is debated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The link between these parameters and the decrease of creatinine clearance, deltaCcr (according to Cockroft) was assessed in uni- and multivariate analysis in a population of 49 patients (26 women; age 60+/-15 years, weight 79+/-15 kg) selected out of 173 presently treated hemodialysis patients on the basis of availability of a quarterly follow-up for 2 years before starting dialysis. The patients were advised a moderate protein and salt restriction which could be retrospectively assessed (on urinary excretion of urea and sodium) at, respectively, 0.82 g/kg/day and 6.5 g/day. RESULTS: The 2-year deltaCcr was 14+/-14 ml/min. It was not different in men and women. This decrease in Ccr was neither significantly different in gomerular disease (17+/-8, n = 14), diabetic nephropathy (12+/-6, n = 7), nephroangiosclerosis (15+/-8, n = 5), interstitial nephritis (12+/-10, n = 14), and PKD (11 +/-12, n = 9). Patients with antihypertensive drugs (n = 42) had a faster progression than those without drugs (n = 7): deltaCcr = 15+/-14 vs 7+/-7 ml/min (p < 0.05) in spite of comparable blood pressure but with higher proteinuria. Linear regression of deltaCcr with the initial and 2-year averaged values of the quantitative parameters showed a significant positive link for both values with cholesterol, hemoglobine and proteinuria and a negative one with protidemia. A positive link was observed with the initial value of bicarbonate and the 2-year mean of diastolic and mean blood pressures. No link at all was observed with urea and Na excretion, CaPO4 product and triglycerides. Multiple regression disclosed a significant link only for protidemia (negative with both initial and 2-year averaged value), diastolic BP (only for the 2-year averaged value and hemoglobinemia (for the initial value). When the patients were classified according to a threshold value of their protidemia, DBP, hemoglobinemia, and cholesterolemia those with the combination of 2 risk factors of progression (protidemia > or = 66 g/l, DBP > or = 90 mmHg, hemoglobinemia > 11 g/dl, proteinuria > or = 3 g/d, CT > 5 mmol/l) had a significantly greater decrease of Ccr than those with the 3 other combinations at the exception of the association of low protidemia with DBP. CONCLUSION: Diastolic hypertension and low protidemia are the 2 most important factors predicting progression of renal failure. A predictive synergy was furthermore pointed out between low protidemia or diastolic hypertension with proteinuria and cholesterol. On the contrary anemia attenuates progression linked to low protidemia, diastolic hypertension, proteinuria and high cholesterol.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Angiotensin II (AII) acts by 2 types of receptors: the ATI receptor which mediates its actions on vasoconstriction, renin (inhibition) and aldosterone (stimulation) secretions, cellular proliferation and angiogenesis and the non-AT1 (often called AT2) receptors. Mainly expressed in the embryon these latter may favor cellular differentiation and recruitment of collateral circulation. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) decrease the synthesis of All and therefore the stimulation of both receptor types whereas AT1-receptor antagonists (AT1RA) block only the stimulation of these latter and increase the stimulation of AT2 receptor since they increase the production of All secondarily to the inhibition of the feedback of renin secretion by All. Experimentally ACEI and AT1RA decrease angiogenesis and cellular proliferation and favor cellular differentiation which could explain the protective effect of ACEI against cancer suggested recently in a Scotish study. Despite of their common suppressive effect on angiogenesis AT1RA may better than ACEI protect against ischemic events specially the cerebral ones because they favor the rapid recruitment of collateral circulation. This has been demonstrated for losartan in case of abrupt ligation of the carotid in the gerbil since its previous administration protects against fatal cerebral ischemia whereas its previous administration with enalapril abolishes this protection. These data may explain why, in the CAPP trial, captopril which has prevented more effectively diabetes occurrence could not be proved superior to diuretics and/or betablocker in the prevention of myocardial infarction and specially of strokes for which exist on the contrary a suspicion of a lower protection. Therefore a comparative trial between AT1RA and ACEI in the prevention of stroke recurrence should appear as a priority for Public Health and Pharmaceutical Industry Authorities.

Asunto(s)