RESUMEN
The recent unfortunate rabies transmissions through solid organ transplants of an infected donor in Germany required the initiation of a vaccination program to protect health care workers (HCWs) with close contact to rabies-infected patients. A systematic follow-up of adverse effects was initiated. Rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was started in 269 HCWs at four German hospitals. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PreEP) was administered to 74 HCWs caring for an already diagnosed rabies patient. At each vaccination date, HCWs were interviewed for symptoms possibly representing adverse effects. Adverse effects of PEP and PrePEP were compared. Out of 269 HCWs, 216 were included for the investigation of adverse effects. Of these 216 HCWs, 114 (53%) individuals developed at least one systemic adverse effect. Incidences of tiredness (30.6%), malaise (26.4%), headache (26.9%), dizziness (14.8%), and chills (13.0%) declined in the course of PEP (p < 0.05), whereas incidences of fever (7.4%), paraesthesias (7.9%), arthralgias (1.9%), myalgias (4.2%), nausea (9.3%), diarrheas (2.8%) and vomiting (1.4%) did not. In 11 (5.1%) HCWs PEP was discontinued mostly due to adverse reactions (four suffered strong headaches, two HCWs meningeal irritations, two chills, one paraesthesia, one malaise, and one a rush). Systemic effects of PEP or PreEP did not differ significantly. Despite relatively high incidences of moderate severe adverse reactions rabies PEP is safe. Strong headache, tiredness, dizziness, and paraesthesias are the most important postvaccinal symptoms. Vaccinees suffering from adverse effects of PEP must be strongly encouraged to complete PEP, as it is to date the only protection against fatal rabies.
Asunto(s)
Inmunización Pasiva/efectos adversos , Vacunación Masiva/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional , Vacunas Antirrábicas/efectos adversos , Rabia , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Trazado de Contacto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Vacunación Masiva/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Rabia/inmunología , Rabia/prevención & control , Trasplantes/virologíaRESUMEN
Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are a new routine therapy option for end-stage heart failure. However, the incidence of VAD-related infections varies between 20 and 188% and makes a major contribution to VAD-related morbidity. Therefore, optimised infection control policies should be applied to prevent VAD-related infections. As to date only a few studies exist investigating particular prevention measures for VAD recipients, we have tried to adapt evidence-based guidelines. In detail the following preventive measures are discussed: antibiotic prophylaxis, endocarditis prophylaxis, dressing technique for the driveline-exit site and education of patients and medical staff. A new patient-based surveillance system is proposed which reflects the different times since implantation of VADs and therefore allows a fair method for interhospital comparison.
Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Endocarditis Bacteriana/prevención & control , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Between January 2002 and December 2003 all 157 patients (pts) that underwent lung transplantation (LTx) at our institution were prospectively screened for invasive aspergillosis (IA) during their perioperative hospital stay. Patients were regarded as IA positive, if they met the EORTC criteria for 'probable' or 'proven' IA. Records of pts were screened retrospectively for antimycotic prophylaxis. Eight of the 157 pts developed 'probable' or 'proven' IA (5.1%) within 17 +/- 10 days after LTx. This was associated with a 14-fold increased mortality compared with all pts without aspergillosis (P < 0.01, OR 13.8, CI(95%) 2.5-82). Preoperative colonization with Aspergillus was a significant risk factor for IA (P < 0.001, OR 21.9, CI(95%) 4.9-97). We switched our prophylactic strategies to the primary administration of voriconazole in high risk pts (pre-LTx colonization) starting in December 2002. Six pts (6%) of 101 pts receiving itraconazole for antimycotic prophylaxis beginning at postoperative day (POD) one developed IA, of which three pts showed cerebral aspergillosis. One pt (5%) of 18 pts receiving voriconazole prophylaxis developed IA, while 10 pts showed pretransplant colonization with Aspergillus species. Thirty-eight pts received itraconazole prophylaxis at a later time point (>POD 14). By switching our prophylactic strategy to the use of voriconazole in high risk pts, we have decreased the incidence of IA from 8% (six of 75) in 2002 to 2% (two of 82) in 2003. This study shows a high incidence of IA during the very early postoperative course after LTx of 5%. This is associated with a significantly increased risk for mortality. Voriconazole prophylaxis appears to be superior to itraconazole, especially in high risk pts with pretransplant Aspergillus colonization.