Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hypertens ; 28(3): 452-8, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20087217

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Three professional devices for office blood pressure (BP) measurement, using three different algorithms to determine BP, were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. The Omron BP10 uses the oscillometric method, the Omron HBP T105 (module HBP-M3600) uses the smart inflation mode and high-speed measurement and the Pic Indolor Professional check is a hybrid sphygmomanometer. METHODS: The International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension is divided into two phases and includes a total number of 33 participants on whom the validation is performed. In each study and for each participant, four BP measurements were performed simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values was calculated for each measure. The 99 pairs BP differences were classified into three categories (

Asunto(s)
Monitores de Presión Sanguínea , Presión Sanguínea , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Blood Press Monit ; 15(1): 49-54, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20032779

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Three oscillometric devices for the self blood pressure measurement were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension in three separate studies. The Omron M3 Intellisense and the Omron M2 Compact measures blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level; the Omron R3-I Plus measures BP at the wrist level. METHODS: The International Protocol is divided into two phases and includes a total number of 33 participants on whom the validation is performed. In each study, and for each participant, four BP measurements were taken simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements with the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values was calculated for each measurement. The 99 pairs of BP differences were classified into three categories (< or =5, < or =10, < or =15 mmHg). RESULTS: All three tested devices passed the first and second phase of the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were 1.9+/-3.0 and -1.0+/-2.3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, for the Omron M3 Intellisense device, 2.5+/-5.4 and -2.3+/-3.6 mmHg for the Omron M2 Compact device, and 1.4+/-4.5 and 0.8+/-4.6 mmHg for the Omron R3-I Plus device. CONCLUSION: Readings of the Omron M3 Intellisense, the Omron M2 Compact and the Omron R3-I Plus, differing by less than 5, 10, and 15 mmHg fulfill the International Protocol requirements and therefore can be used by patients for self blood pressure measurement.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/normas , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Esfigmomanometros/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autocuidado/instrumentación , Autocuidado/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA