RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the first known case of human Bertiellosis in Paraná (Brazil). Case description: A 6-year-old male residing in the Brazilian state of Paraná was suffering from intermittent nonspecific abdominal pain and abdominal distension, associated with expulsion of live tapeworms in his feces for 7 months. He had a history of interaction with monkeys on an island. His first feces analysis was inconclusive, with an initial hypothesis of an atypical Taenia. However, after additional research, the parasitologist identified pregnant proglottids of Bertiella sp. The patient was initially treated with an unknown dosage of albendazole and nitazoxanide, as it was believed he had been infected with Taenia sp. Since the symptoms persisted, praziquantel 10 mg/kg was prescribed without further proglottids elimination. Comments: Human Bertiellosis is a rare zoonosis, with less than one hundred cases reported. However, it is a cause of chronic abdominal pain and should be kept as a differential diagnosis, especially in cases reporting recurrent tapeworm expulsion in feces and refractory treatment with albendazole.
RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever o primeiro caso conhecido de bertielose humana no Paraná, Brasil. Descrição do caso: Criança de seis anos do sexo masculino, residente no Paraná, Brasil, apresentava dor abdominal inespecífica intermitente e distensão abdominal, associadas à expulsão de helmintos vivos em suas fezes havia sete meses. Tinha um histórico de interação com macacos em uma ilha. Sua primeira análise de fezes foi inconclusiva, com hipótese inicial de uma Taenia atípica. No entanto, após pesquisas adicionais, o parasitologista identificou proglótides gravídicas de Bertiella sp. O paciente foi inicialmente tratado com uma dosagem desconhecida de albendazol e nitazoxanida, pois se acreditava que havia sido infectado por Taenia sp. Diante da persistência dos sintomas, foi prescrito praziquantel 10 mg/kg, sem mais eliminação de proglótides. Comentários: A bertielose humana é uma zoonose rara, com menos de cem casos relatados. No entanto, é uma causa de dor abdominal crônica e deve ser mantida como diagnóstico diferencial, principalmente nos casos que relatam expulsão recorrente de helmintos nas fezes e que são refratários ao tratamento com albendazol.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the first known case of human Bertiellosis in Paraná (Brazil). CASE DESCRIPTION: A 6-year-old male residing in the Brazilian state of Paraná was suffering from intermittent nonspecific abdominal pain and abdominal distension, associated with expulsion of live tapeworms in his feces for 7 months. He had a history of interaction with monkeys on an island. His first feces analysis was inconclusive, with an initial hypothesis of an atypical Taenia. However, after additional research, the parasitologist identified pregnant proglottids of Bertiella sp. The patient was initially treated with an unknown dosage of albendazole and nitazoxanide, as it was believed he had been infected with Taenia sp. Since the symptoms persisted, praziquantel 10 mg/kg was prescribed without further proglottids elimination. COMMENTS: Human Bertiellosis is a rare zoonosis, with less than one hundred cases reported. However, it is a cause of chronic abdominal pain and should be kept as a differential diagnosis, especially in cases reporting recurrent tapeworm expulsion in feces and refractory treatment with albendazole.
Asunto(s)
Cestodos , Infecciones por Cestodos , Masculino , Niño , Animales , Humanos , Brasil , Albendazol/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Cestodos/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients listed for liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma are considered priority on the waiting list, and this could overly favor them. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this prioritization. METHODS: We analyzed the liver transplants performed in adults from 2011 to 2020 and divided into three groups: adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for hepatocellular carcinoma, other adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease situations, and no adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease. RESULTS: A total of 1,706 patients were included in the study, of which 70.2% were male. Alcoholism was the main etiology of cirrhosis (29.6%). Of the total, 305 patients were with hepatocellular carcinoma, 86 with other adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease situations, and 1,315 with no adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were older (58.9 vs. 53.5 years). The predominant etiology of cirrhosis was viral hepatitis (60%). The findings showed that group with adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease had lower physiological Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (10.9), higher adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (22.6), and longer waiting list time (131 vs. 110 days), as compared to the group with no adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease. The total number of transplants and the proportion of patients transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma increased from 2011 to 2020. There was a reduction in the proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease of 20 and there was an increase on waiting list time in this group. There was an increase in the proportion of those with adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease of 24 and 29, but the waiting list time remained stable. CONCLUSION: Over the past decade, prioritization of hepatocellular carcinoma resulted in an increased proportion of transplanted patients in relation to those with no priority. It also increased waiting list time, requiring higher adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease to transplant an organ.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Trasplante de Hígado , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática , Listas de Espera , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Patients listed for liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma are considered priority on the waiting list, and this could overly favor them. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this prioritization. METHODS: We analyzed the liver transplants performed in adults from 2011 to 2020 and divided into three groups: adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for hepatocellular carcinoma, other adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease situations, and no adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease. RESULTS: A total of 1,706 patients were included in the study, of which 70.2% were male. Alcoholism was the main etiology of cirrhosis (29.6%). Of the total, 305 patients were with hepatocellular carcinoma, 86 with other adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease situations, and 1,315 with no adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were older (58.9 vs. 53.5 years). The predominant etiology of cirrhosis was viral hepatitis (60%). The findings showed that group with adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease had lower physiological Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (10.9), higher adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (22.6), and longer waiting list time (131 vs. 110 days), as compared to the group with no adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease. The total number of transplants and the proportion of patients transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma increased from 2011 to 2020. There was a reduction in the proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease of 20 and there was an increase on waiting list time in this group. There was an increase in the proportion of those with adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease of 24 and 29, but the waiting list time remained stable. CONCLUSION: Over the past decade, prioritization of hepatocellular carcinoma resulted in an increased proportion of transplanted patients in relation to those with no priority. It also increased waiting list time, requiring higher adjusted Model of End-Stage Liver Disease to transplant an organ.
RESUMO RACIONAL: Pacientes portadores de carcinoma hepatocelular com indicação de transplante hepático recebem prioridade na lista de espera e isso poderia favorecê-los demasiadamente. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto dessa priorização. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados os transplantes hepáticos realizados de 2011 até 2020 no estado do Paraná, divididos em três grupos: portadores de carcinoma hepatocelular no modelo para doença hepática terminal (MELD) ajustado, outras situações no modelo para doença hepática terminal ajustado e sem o modelo para doença hepática terminal ajustado. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 1.706 pacientes, 70,2% do gênero masculino, a maioria portadores de cirrose alcoólica (29,6%): 305 com hepatocarcinoma, 86 com outras situações no modelo para doença hepática terminal ajustado e 1.315 sem o modelo para doença hepática terminal ajustado. Nos portadores de hepatocarcinoma, a idade média foi maior (58,9 vs 53,5 anos), a etiologia predominante da cirrose foram as hepatites virais (60%), apresentaram menor no modelo para doença hepática terminal fisiológico (10,9), maior no modelo para doença hepática terminal corrigido (22,6 vs 21,8) e maior tempo em lista de espera (131 vs 110 dias) quando comparados ao grupo sem o modelo para doença hepática terminal ajustado. O número de transplantes e a proporção de pacientes transplantados por hepatocarcinoma aumentou de 2011 até 2020. Houve redução da proporção dos portadores de hepatocarcinoma com o modelo para doença hepática terminal de 20 no decorrer da década e aumento do tempo em lista nesse grupo. Para os com modelo para doença hepática terminalde 24 e de 29, houve aumento na proporção e o tempo em lista permaneceu estável. CONCLUSÃO: A priorização do hepatocarcinoma conferiu maior modelo para doença hepática terminal e incremento na proporção de transplantes em relação aos sem prioridade. Também aumentou o tempo em lista de espera, necessitando maior modelo para doença hepática terminal corrigido para obtenção de um órgão.