RESUMEN
(1) Background: The rise of online health resources and AI has reshaped the diagnosis and treatment of disease, altering the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals and encouraging self-medication. However, questionnaires validated in the literature on self-medication seem to lack questions on the possible causes that induce such behaviors, including items that explore trust toward websites and artificial intelligence. The aim of this study is to design and validate the content of a questionnaire designed to assess self-medication in health professionals, delving into the underlying etiologies, the pharmacological categories involved and the degree of confidence placed in clinical assessments derived from AI tools. (2) Methods: Validation study of the content of an instrument consisting of two phases: 1. The content validation phase involved evaluation by a selected group of health experts, who, using a Likert-type scale, analyzed the clarity, coherence and relevance of the items. 2. Pilot study of health professionals who have indicated the practice of self-administration of medications. (3) Results: In the first phase of the study, the experts considered most of the questionnaire items to be clear, representative and consistent with the construct to be measured. In its second phase, the preliminary results of our pilot study suggest a significant trend toward self-medication among healthcare workers, along with a strong inclination to use online resources to search for health-related information. (4) Conclusions: The development of a validated instrument to measure the influence of the different causes that lead healthcare personnel to practice self-medication, guaranteeing validity and efficacy, allows us to establish strategies to reduce this growing problem.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, public confrontations between people who had agreed to be vaccinated and those who had not, highlighted the relevance of the deepening dissemination of violent and discriminatory expressions and determined a level of perception of hate discourses. METHOD: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out, based on an innovative methodology: simulations of WhatsApp conversations. In addition, the following variables were considered among others: level of empathy, personality traits and conflict resolution. RESULTS: The participants were 567 nursing students (413 females, 153 males and 1 person who did not identify with any gender). The results showed that, for the most part, the participants correctly identified hate speech, but were unable to discern the frame of reference. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to implement intervention strategies to minimize the impact of hate speech, which continues to be used on many levels to harass others, justify violence or undermine rights, generating an environment of prejudice and intolerance that encourages discrimination and violent attacks against certain individuals or collectives.
RESUMEN
Stress and stressors related to clinical practice are some of the main reasons for the discomfort reported by nursing students. It is important to identify the causes of stress and seek strategies to reduce the stress levels in nursing students. Clinical training seminars have proven to be a useful tool to reduce stress levels. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a series of clinical training seminars on the levels of stress and perception of stress factors before the start of clinical practice among undergraduate Spanish nursing students. A two-phase, sequential mixed-methods design was used. For the quantitative phase, data were collected using Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale and the KEZKAK questionnaire before and after the clinical training seminars. Qualitative data were collected through a focus group session held after the clinical training period. The results show a significant reduction (p = 0.002) in perceived stress levels after the clinical training seminars, and also a change in students' perception of stressors in the clinical placement. This study provides valuable information for the development of content for clinical training seminars. Universities should develop strategies to reduce stress in their students caused by the clinical placement.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In recent decades the fight against breast cancer has focused primarily on the treatment and secondary prevention (early detection mainly). In the case of breast self-examination, althought it has not been prove to reduce mortality, it is important in cases detected by women themselves (it is estimated 90% of total), mainly in the interval cancers. OBJECTIVES: To identify within women with breast cancer, how many do self-examination and identify associated factors. Describe the clinical and pathological features of cancers in women who do perform self-examination. METHODOLOGY: In women diagnosed with breast cancer during 2007 in a hospital in the province of Cadiz, Spain, is reconstructed in retrospect the story related the cancer process: symptoms, psychosocial factors that determine the contact with the health system, preventive practices (self-examination, mammography screening). A description of the pathological tumor: presenting symptom, tumor size, node negative, grade of differentiation. RESULTS: We studied 149 women with breast cancer, from whom 52% did self-exploration. Women who performed self-examination were younger (54.78 years) against the women who did not (65.63 years), married (66.2%), active workers and have a higher educational level. The assessment of the first symptoms in these women as "important" is positively correlated with those women who practice self-examination. For other preventive practices, women who does self-examination are also the most actives in early detection programs (74.4% against 29.5% which didn't do self-examination). For the pathologic characteristics of tumor in women who did self-examination: the tumor size was 2.5 cm, 50.7/are well differentiated, and 59.1% of cases the nodes are negative. CONCLUSIONS: Women who does self-examination are younger, have higher educational level, are married, are active workers and are often involved in other preventive practices. On them, the tumors diagnosed have a smaller size, are diagnosed at earlier stages and usually present better degree of differentiation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Autoexamen de Mamas , Autoexamen de Mamas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Antecedentes. En las últimas décadas la lucha contra el cáncer de mama se ha centrado, básicamente, en el tratamiento y en la prevención secundaria (fundamentalmente la detección precoz). La autoexploración mamaria, aunque no se ha demostrado que reduzca la mortalidad, sí es importante respecto a los casos detectados por la propia mujer (se estima que un 90% del total) y principalmente en los cánceres de intervalo. Objetivos. Identificar entre mujeres con cáncer de mama, cuántas realizan la autoexploración y los factores asociados. Describir las características clínico-patológicas de los cánceres en las mujeres que sí realizan la autoexploración. Metodología. En mujeres diagnosticadas de cáncer de mama, en un hospital de la provincia de Cádiz, España, se reconstruye de manera retrospectiva la historia relacionada con el proceso del cáncer, es decir, sintomatología, factores psicosociales que determinan el contacto con el sistema sanitario, realización de prácticas preventivas (participación en el Programa de Detección Precoz del Cáncer de Mama PDPCM, autoexploración mamaria,...). Se realiza una descripción clínico-patológica del tumor: síntoma de presentación, tamaño tumoral, ganglios negativos, grado de diferenciación histológica. Resultados. Se estudiaron 149 mujeres con cáncer de mama, de las cuales el 52% realizaba autoexploración. Las mujeres que realizan autoexploración son más jóvenes (54,78 años frente a 65,63), están casadas (66,2%), se encuentran laboralmente activas y tienen un nivel de estudios mayor. La valoración de la aparición del primer síntoma como algo importante se correlaciona positivamente con aquellas mujeres que practican la autoexploración. En cuanto a otras prácticas preventivas, las que se autoexploran son también las que más acuden al programa de detección precoz (74,4% frente a 29,5% en las que no se autoexploran). En cuanto a las características clínico-patológicas del tumor en las mujeres que se autoexploran: el tamaño tumoral medio es de 2,5 cm; el 50,7% se halla bien diferenciado, y en un 59,1% de los casos los ganglios son negativos. Conclusiones. Las mujeres que se autoexploran son más jóvenes, tienen un nivel educativo mayor, están casadas, se encuentran laboralmente activas y suelen participar en otras prácticas preventivas. En ellas, los tumores diagnosticados presentan un menor tamaño, se diagnostican en estadios más precoces y por lo general presentan mejor grado de diferenciación(AU)
Background/Aims: In recent decades the fight against breast cancer has focused primarily on the treatment and secondary prevention (early detection mainly). In the case of breast self-examination, althought it has not been prove to reduce mortality, it is important in cases detected by women themselves (it is estimated 90% of total), mainly in the interval cancers. Objectives: To identify within women with breast cancer, how many do self-examination and identify associated factors. Describe the clinical and pathological features of cancers in women who do perform self-examination. Methodology: In women diagnosed with breast cancer during 2007 in a hospital in the province of Cadiz, Spain, is reconstructed in retrospect the story related the cancer process: symptoms, psychosocial factors that determine the contact with the health system, preventive practices (self-examination, mammography screening). A description of the pathological tumor: presenting symptom, tumor size, node negative, grade of differentiation Results: We studied 149 women with breast cancer, from whom 52% did self-exploration. Women who performed self-examination were younger (54.78 years) against the women who did not (65.63 years), married (66.2%), active workers and have a higher educational level. The assessment of the first symptoms in these women as «important» is positively correlated with those women who practice self-examination. For other preventive practices, women who does self-examination are also the most actives in early detection programs (74.4% against 29.5% which didnt do self-examination). For the pathologic characteristics of tumor in women who did self-examination: the tumor size was 2.5 cm, 50.7 / are well differentiated, and 59.1% of cases the nodes are negative. Conclusions: Women who does self-examination are younger, have higher educational level, are married, are active workers and are often involved in other preventive practices. On them, the tumors diagnosed have a smaller size, are diagnosed at earlier stages and usually present better degree of differentiation(AU)