Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 19(4): 494-8, 1993 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8355156

RESUMEN

One hundred fifty-one unilateral cataract patients were randomly assigned to receive either a one-piece Staar AA-4203 silicone intraocular lens inserted through a 3.5 mm incision, an loptex 5 mm x 6 mm oval optic lens inserted through a 5.5 mm incision, or an AMO three-piece modified C-loop 6.0 round optic poly(methyl methacrylate) lens inserted through a 6.5 mm incision. Follow-up was 97% at two days postoperatively and 84% at one week and two months postoperatively. At one week postoperatively, 62% of 3.5 mm incision cases had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better compared with 33% of 5.5 mm (P < .01) and 43% of 6.5 mm incision cases. At two months postoperatively, 85% of 3.5 mm incision cases had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better compared with 64% of 6.5 mm (P < .05) and 71% of 5.5 mm incision cases. The 3.5 mm incision cases had significantly less total keratometric cylinder than other cases at all postoperative examinations (P < or = .001) and less surgically induced cylinder at two days and one week post-operatively (P < or = .02). The 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm incision cases did not differ significantly in visual acuity or astigmatism at any examination.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Lentes Intraoculares , Técnicas de Sutura , Trastornos de la Visión/rehabilitación , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Astigmatismo/etiología , Astigmatismo/prevención & control , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metilmetacrilatos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Elastómeros de Silicona , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos
2.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 18(2): 147-52, 1992 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1564652

RESUMEN

In a unilateral prospective clinical trial, 77 cases were randomized to receive a 3M multifocal IOL or a conventional monofocal implant. Multifocal cases had better uncorrected near vision than monofocal cases at the two to four month visit. Thirty percent of the multifocal cases had near acuity J1, while only 4% of the monofocal cases had that acuity. Eighty-seven percent of multifocal cases and 71% of monofocal cases had near acuities of J1 to J3. With distance correction in place, 54% of multifocal cases had near acuities of J1 to J2, while only 28% of monofocal cases had comparable acuities (P = .04). There have been no serious postoperative complications in either group.


Asunto(s)
Lentes Intraoculares , Óptica y Fotónica , Errores de Refracción/fisiopatología , Agudeza Visual , Extracción de Catarata , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA