RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify the specific motivations that drive healthy volunteers to consent for their participation in clinical studies. Additionally, the study aimed to document the socio-demographic determinants of participation in the trial related solely to the intention of securing financial gains. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among subjects who participated as healthy volunteers in clinical trials conducted by Contract Research Organizations (CROs) of Delhi. Pre-tested, validated semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect baseline socio-demographic data, information about factors motivating participation in clinical trials, and pattern of utilisation of money received against participation in the trial. Logistic regression analysis was done to determine the factors that influenced participation in the trial related purely to the motive of securing financial gains. RESULTS: A total of 400 participants were selected. The majority of the volunteers (77.5%) reported that their sole reason for participating in clinical trials was for monetary gain. Around a tenth of the volunteers participated with the intent to advance scientific knowledge and another 4.5% participated due to benefits of free medical check-ups. Participants in the age group of 29-38 years, those that were married, those residing in an urban slum, male participants, those with a high number of dependent family members (ie, 5 to 8), and those earning less than 5000 INR (71 USD) a month had higher odds of participating in a clinical trial purely for the financial benefits. Those educated till intermediate and above had lower odds of participation in the trial due to monetary benefits. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that healthy volunteers in Delhi consider participation in clinical trials mainly because of the prospect of financial reward. More research is needed to inform judgments around the ethics of providing financial rewards and enrollment of healthy research volunteers.
RESUMEN
Process to obtain informed consent is an essential component in research involving human subjects. However, much is not known about the level of awareness participants have about optimal consenting process and the motives that drive their participation in the trials. A cross-sectional study was conducted among volunteers who had been participating in clinical trials in contract research organizations of Delhi. Validated questionnaires were used to assess their knowledge, attitude, and practice of informed consent process. Most of the volunteers, 226 (56.5%), had participated in 1 to 3 clinical trials. Majority (54%) were unaware about any informed consent document. None of them were aware of their right of profession competence, privacy and integrity, transparency, nonexploitation, and nonusage of their biological samples. Effective implementation of principles of informed consenting is largely lacking among contract research organizations in Delhi, India. This could potentially cause risk to the participants.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Consentimiento Informado , Motivación , Sujetos de Investigación/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , India , Masculino , Sujetos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Because of the lack of suitable pediatric antiretroviral (ARV) agents, adult fixed-dose ARVs are commonly used in children. This practice poses concerns about dose inaccuracy, which may lead to resistance or toxicity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new pediatric fixed-dose combination (FDC) ARV tablet for oral suspension as compared with individual liquid formulations. METHODS: The FDC ARV tablet for oral suspension contained lamivudine 40 mg, nevirapine 70 mg, and stavudine 10 mg. This formulation was compared with 4 mL of lamivudine 10 mg/mL, 7 mL of nevirapine 50 mg/5 mL, and 10 mL of stavudine 1 mg/mL. This was an open-label, balanced, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, single-dose crossover study in 36 Indian male volunteers under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.167, 0.25, 0.333, 0.5, 0.667, 0.833, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, and 192 hours after dosing in each period. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age, weight, and height of the Indian volunteers were 24.78 (5.31) years (range, 18-38 years), 57.06 (8.59) kg (range, 45-77 kg), and 165.14 (5.34) cm (range, 156-176 cm), respectively. The mean (SD) values for T(max), C(max), and AUC(0-t) for the FDC and the individual liquid formulations, respectively, were as follows: lamivudine, 0.71 (0.22) and 0.89 (0.50) hour, 594 (167) and 514 (139) ng/mL, 2382 (617) and 2227 (666) ng /mL per hour; nevirapine, 1.7 (1.1) and 2.5 (1.2) hours, 1248 (275) and 1185 (238) ng/mL, 70,372 (14,869) and 71,278 (17,435) ng/ mL per hour; and stavudine, 0.44 (0.11) and 0.43 (0.11) hour, 348 (82) and 395 (107) ng/mL, and 576 (113) and 631 (142) ng/mL per hour. The ratios and 90% CIs for the least-squares mean Cmax and AUC values were found to be within the prespecified range of 80% to 125% for each component. CONCLUSION: The FDC pediatric formulation of lamivudine, nevirapine, and stavudine was bioequivalent to the individual liquid formulations in these fasting, healthy Indian men.