RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is urgently needed to provide safer treatment to counteract antimicrobial resistance. This is critical in septic patients, because resistance increases empiric therapy uncertainty and the risk of a poor outcome. We validate a novel 2h flow cytometry AST assay directly from positive blood cultures (PBC) by using a room temperature stable FASTgramneg and FASTgrampos kits (FASTinov® Porto, Portugal) in three sites: FASTinov (site-1), Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain (site-2) and Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal (site-3). A total of 670 PBC were included: 333 spiked (site-1) and 337 clinical PBC (151 site-2 and 186 site-3): 367 gram-negative and 303 gram-positive. Manufacturer instructions were followed for sample preparation, panel inoculation, incubation (1h/37ºC) and flow cytometry analysis using CytoFlex (Site-1 and -2) or DxFlex (site-3) both instruments from Beckman-Coulter, USA. RESULTS: A proprietary software (bioFAST) was used to immediately generate a susceptibility report in less than 2 h. In parallel, samples were processed according to reference AST methods (disk diffusion and/or microdilution) and interpreted with EUCAST and CLSI criteria. Additionally, ten samples were spiked in all sites for inter-laboratory reproducibility. Sensitivity and specificity were >95% for all antimicrobials. Reproducibility was 96.8%/95.0% for FASTgramneg and 95.1%/95.1% for FASTgrampos regarding EUCAST/CLSI criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: FASTinov® kits consistently provide ultra-rapid AST in 2h with high accuracy and reproducibility on both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This technology creates a new paradigm in bacterial infection management and holds the potential to significantly impact septic patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cultivo de Sangre , Citometría de Flujo , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Humanos , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/instrumentación , Cultivo de Sangre/métodos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo , Portugal , España , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Accurate assessment of colistin susceptibility is crucial with the increasing number of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and simultaneously increasing colistin resistance. Both EUCAST and CLSI recommend broth microdilution (BMD) to determine colistin susceptibility, however it is cumbersome and growth-dependent. In this study, a rapid flow cytometry method (FASTinovâ) to determine colistin susceptibility directly from positive blood cultures (BCs) was evaluated. BCs were spiked with 204 Gram-negative bacilli (137 Enterobacterales, 35 Pseudomonas spp. and 32 Acinetobacter baumannii) at a concentration of 2â¯×â¯103 cells/bottle, inoculated with human donor blood and incubated until flagged positive. As quality control strains, two susceptible (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853) and two resistant (colistin-resistant mcr-1-positive E. coli NCTC 13846 and Serratia marcescens ATCC 14756) were used. Bacteria were extracted according to assay instructions and were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 2 and 4 mg/L colistin and a fluorescent dye, previously optimised. Cells were analysed on CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter) and AccuriTM C6 Plus (BD Biosciences) flow cytometers. Colistin susceptibility results were automatically provided by BioFAST software (FASTinovâ) and compared with those obtained with standard BMD. Overall categorical agreement between this new flow cytometry method and BMD was 99.0%. No very major errors were detected as well as no discrepancies between both flow cytometers. Here we describe a rapid and accurate assay for colistin susceptibility directly from positive BCs with a turnaround time of 2 h versus 48 h required for BMD. This method represents an accurate alternative to standard BMD.