RESUMEN
Abstract Objectives: measuring the prevalence of interventions and/or complications based on the Maternity Safety Thermometer (MST) criteria and verifying associations with sociodemographic, clinical, and obstetric factors. Methods: prospective observational study conducted with postpartum women admitted to the maternity ward of a tertiary hospital, from October 10th to December 30th, 2020. Data were collected from medical records and self-administered questionnaires from 260 patients. Results: harm-free care was detected in 17.7% of participants, 66.9% had low-temperature damage (one or less intervention/complication) and 33.1% of patients had elevated temperature damage (two or more intervention/complication). The most frequent intervention was the "scar", given that 38.5% had abdominal scarring (cesarean section) and 26.5% had perineal scarring (2nd-degree tear or greater - spontaneous or by episiotomy). The second most frequent MST item was related to the perception of safety (30%), followed by complications to the newborn (12.3%), infection (11.2%), and hemorrhage (9.2%). Factors related to high temperature were: being of social class A or B, having a previous cesarean section, and being hospitalized during pregnancy. Conclusions: one-third of the participating women had two or more complications/interventions (high temperature by the MST), factors that are related to this temperature were: being of social class A or B, having a previous cesarean section, and being hospitalized during pregnancy.
Resumo Objetivos: mensurar a prevalência de intervenções e/ou complicações a partir dos critérios estabelecidos pelo Termômetro de Segurança da Maternidade (TSM) e avaliar associações com fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos e obstétricos. Métodos: estudo observacional prospectivo realizado com puérperas internadas na maternidade de hospital terciário, de 10 de outubro a 30 de dezembro de 2020. Foram coletados dados do prontuário e de questionários autoaplicáveis de 260 pacientes. Resultados: um cuidado livre de intervenções/complicações foi detectado em 17,7% das participantes, 66,9% apresentaram baixa temperatura (até uma intervenção/complicação) e 33,1% tiveram alta temperatura de intervenções/complicações (2 ou mais). A intervenção mais frequente foi a denominada "cicatriz", sendo que 38,5% tiveram cicatriz abdominal (cesariana) e 26,5% tiveram "cicatriz" perineal (laceração de 2º grau ou mais - espontânea ou por episiotomia). O segundo dano mais frequente foi o relacionado à percepção de segurança (30%), seguido de complicações do recémnascido (12,3%), infecção (11,2%), e hemorragia (9,2%). Houve associação de ter alta temperatura com ser de classe social A ou B, ter cesárea anterior e ser internada na gestação. Conclusões: das mulheres participantes, um terço teve duas ou mais complicações/intervenções (alta temperatura no TSM), estiveram relacionados a essa temperatura: ser de classe social A ou B, ter cesárea anterior e ser internada ao longo da gestação.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil , Seguridad del Paciente , COVID-19 , Maternidades , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Partería , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Brasil , Factores SociodemográficosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is currently accepted and widespread worldwide. However, according tol the surgical experience on this approach, surgical and short-term oncologic results may vary. Studies comparing laparoscopic vs. open surgery in our population are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the superiority of the laparoscopic vs. open technique for colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: This retrospective and comparative study collected data from patients operated on for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2011 at the Angeles Lomas Hospital, Mexico. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in this study; 47 were operated through an open approach and 35 laparoscopically. Mean operative time was significantly lower in the open approach group (p= 0.008). There were no significant difference between both techniques for intraoperative bleeding (p= 0.3980), number of lymph nodes (p= 0.27), time to initiate oral feeding (p= 0.31), hospital stay (p= 0.12), and postoperative pain (p= 0.19). Procedure-related complications rate and type were not significantly different in both groups (p= 0.44). Patients operated laparoscopically required significantly less analgesic drugs (p= 0.04) and less need for epidural postoperative analgesia (p= 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach is as safe as the traditional open approach for colorectal cancer. Early oncological and surgical results confirm its suitability according to this indication.
Antecedentes: la cirugía laparoscópica para tratar pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ha sido ampliamente aceptada y difundida en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, dependiendo de la experiencia en este abordaje los resultados quirúrgicos y oncológicos a corto plazo pueden variar. En nuestra población existen pocos estudios que comparan los resultados de esta técnica con los de la cirugía abierta. Objetivos: determinar la superioridad de la técnica laparoscópica o abierta en cirugía de cáncer colorrectal. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo y comparativo de pacientes operados con técnica abierta o laparoscópica por cáncer de colon y recto entre 1999 y 2011 en nuestro centro. Resultados: se incluyeron 47 pacientes intervenidos de manera convencional y 35 por laparoscopia. El tiempo operatorio fue menor en el grupo de cirugía abierta (p= 0.008). No se encontraron diferencias en: sangrado intraoperatorio (p= 0.3980), número de ganglios resecados (p= 0.27), inicio de la vía oral (p= 0.31), tiempo de estancia hospitalaria (p= 0.12), y dolor referido por el paciente (p= 0.19). En el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica se requirieron menos dosis de analgésicos (p= 0.04) y menor necesidad de catéter epidural para analgesia postoperatoria (p= 0.01). Las tasas de morbilidad (p= 0.44) y mortalidad (p= 0.39) fueron similares en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: la cirugía laparoscópica es equiparable a la técnica abierta en cuanto a estándares oncológicos y resultados técnicos. Este trabajo demuestra que en nuestro hospital la cirugía laparoscópica en pacientes con cáncer de colon y recto es tan segura como la cirugía abierta.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgesia Epidural/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Tumor Carcinoide/cirugía , Colectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/mortalidad , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
A new triterpenoid (1) derived from 24-methylcycloartanol was isolated from the leaves of Oxandra cf. xylopioides. An unusual structure of the new compound was assigned as 1, for which the name berenjenol is proposed, on the basis of the spectroscopic data of the natural product and of its derivatives 2 and 3. The leaves also afforded the known monoterpene isoespintanol (4). Compounds 1 and 4 significantly reduced the paw edema induced by carrageenan by 64% and 43%, at 3 h, respectively. Moreover, 4 reduced IL-1 beta production by 72% at 100 microM and reduced IL-1 beta mRNA synthesis.