RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Participating in surveys can shape the perception of participants related to the study topic. Administering a vaccine hesitancy questionnaire can have negative impacts on participants' vaccine confidence. This is particularly true for online and cross-cultural data collection because culturally safe health education to correct misinformation is typically not provided after the administration of an electronic survey. OBJECTIVE: To create a culturally safe, online, COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey for Indigenous youth designed to collect authentic, culturally relevant data of their vaccine experiences, with a low risk of contributing to further vaccine confusion among participants. METHODS: Using the Aboriginal Telehealth Knowledge Circle consensus method, a team of academics, health care providers, policy makers, and community partners reviewed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy surveys used in public health research, analyzed potential risks, and created a framework for electronic Indigenous vaccine confidence surveys as well as survey items. RESULTS: The framework for safer online survey items is based on 2 principles, a first do-no-harm approach and applying a strengths-based lens. Relevant survey domains identified in the process include sociodemographic information, participants' connection to their community, preferred sources for health information, vaccination uptake among family members and peers, as well as personal attitudes toward vaccines. A total of 44 survey items were developed, including 5 open-ended items to improve the authenticity of the data and the analysis of the experiences of Indigenous youth. CONCLUSIONS: Using an Indigenous consensus method, we have developed an online COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey with culturally relevant domains and reduced the risk of amplifying misinformation and negative impacts on vaccine confidence among Indigenous participants. Our approach can be adapted to other online survey development in collaboration with Indigenous communities.
RESUMEN
Immune checkpoints limit the activation of the immune system and serve an important homeostatic function but can also restrict immune responses against tumors. Inhibition of specific immune checkpoint proteins such as the B7:CD28 family members programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) has transformed the treatment of various cancers by promoting the anti-tumor activation of immune cells. In contrast to these effects, the V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) regulates the steady state of the resting immune system and promotes homeostasis by mechanisms distinct from PD-1 and CTLA-4. The effects of VISTA blockade have been shown to include a decrease in myeloid suppression coupled with proinflammatory changes by mechanisms that are separate and distinct from other immune checkpoint proteins; in some preclinical studies these immune effects appear synergistic. Given the potential benefits of VISTA blockade in the context of cancer therapy, the second Annual VISTA Symposium was convened virtually on September 23, 2022, to review new research from investigators and immuno-oncology experts. Discussions in the meeting extended the knowledge of VISTA biology and the effects of VISTA inhibition, particularly on cells of the myeloid lineage and resting T cells, as three candidate anti-VISTA antibodies are in, or nearing, clinical development.
RESUMEN
V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) is a B7 family member that plays key roles in maintaining T cell quiescence and regulation of myeloid cell populations, which together establish it as a novel immunotherapy target for solid tumors. Here we review the growing literature on VISTA expression in relation to various malignancies to better understand the role of VISTA and its interactions with both tumor cells and immune cells expressing other checkpoint molecules within the tumor microenvironment (TME). The biology of VISTA creates several mechanisms to maintain the TME, including supporting the function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulating natural killer cell activation, supporting the survival of regulatory T cells, limiting antigen presentation on antigen-presenting cells and maintaining T cells in a quiescent state. Understanding these mechanisms is an important foundation of rational patient selection for anti-VISTA therapy. We provide a general framework to describe distinct patterns of VISTA expression in correlation with other known predictive immunotherapy biomarkers (programmed cell death ligand 1 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) across solid tumors to facilitate investigation of the most efficacious TMEs for VISTA-targeted treatment as a single agent and/or in combination with anti-programmed death 1/anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 therapies.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos B7 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antígenos B7/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Linfocitos T Reguladores , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
Background: Mutations in the SF3B1 splicing factor are commonly seen in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet the specific oncogenic pathways activated by mis-splicing have not been fully elucidated. Inflammatory immune pathways have been shown to play roles in the pathogenesis of MDS, though the exact mechanisms of their activation in splicing mutant cases are not well understood. Methods: RNA-seq data from SF3B1 mutant samples was analyzed and functional roles of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) isoforms were determined. Efficacy of IRAK4 inhibition was evaluated in preclinical models of MDS/AML. Results: RNA-seq splicing analysis of SF3B1 mutant MDS samples revealed retention of full-length exon 6 of IRAK4, a critical downstream mediator that links the Myddosome to inflammatory NF-kB activation. Exon 6 retention leads to a longer isoform, encoding a protein (IRAK4-long) that contains the entire death domain and kinase domain, leading to maximal activation of NF-kB. Cells with wild-type SF3B1 contain smaller IRAK4 isoforms that are targeted for proteasomal degradation. Expression of IRAK4-long in SF3B1 mutant cells induces TRAF6 activation leading to K63-linked ubiquitination of CDK2, associated with a block in hematopoietic differentiation. Inhibition of IRAK4 with CA-4948, leads to reduction in NF-kB activation, inflammatory cytokine production, enhanced myeloid differentiation in vitro and reduced leukemic growth in xenograft models. Conclusions: SF3B1 mutation leads to expression of a therapeutically targetable, longer, oncogenic IRAK4 isoform in AML/MDS models. Funding: This work was supported by Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Leukemia Lymphoma Society, and National Institute of Health (R35HL135787, RO1HL111103, RO1DK102759, RO1HL114582), Gabrielle's Angel Foundation for Cancer Research, and Edward P. Evans Foundation grants to DTS. AV is supported by Edward P. Evans Foundation, National Institute of Health (R01HL150832, R01HL139487, R01CA275007), Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Curis and a gift from the Jane and Myles P. Dempsey family. AP and JB are supported by Blood Cancer UK (grants 13042 and 19004). GC is supported by a training grant from NYSTEM. We acknowledge support of this research from The Einstein Training Program in Stem Cell Research from the Empire State Stem Cell Fund through New York State Department of Health Contract C34874GG. MS is supported by a National Institute of Health Research Training and Career Development Grant (F31HL132420).
Genes contain blocks of code that tell cells how to make each part of a protein. Between these blocks are sections of linking DNA, which cells remove when they are preparing to use their genes. Scientists call this process 'splicing'. Cells can splice some genes in more than one way, allowing them to make different proteins from the same genetic code. Mutations that affect the splicing process can change the way cells make their proteins, leading to disease. For example, the myelodysplastic syndromes are a group of blood cancers often caused by mutations in splicing proteins, such as SF3B1. The disorder stops blood cells from maturing and causes abnormal inflammation. So far, the link between splicing, blood cell immaturity, inflammation and cancer is not clear. To find out more, Choudhary, Pellagatti et al. looked at the spliced genetic code from people with myelodysplastic syndromes. Mutations in the splicing protein SF3B1 changed the way cells spliced an important signalling molecule known as IRAK4. Affected cells cut out less genetic code and made a longer version of this signalling protein, named IRAK4-Long. This altered protein activated inflammation and stopped blood cells from maturing. Blocking IRAK4-Long reversed the effects. It also reduced tumour formation in mice carrying affected human cells. The molecule used to block IRAK4, CA-4948 also known as Emavusertib is currently being evaluated in clinical trials for myelodysplastic syndromes and other types of blood cancer. The work of Choudhary, Pellagatti et al. could help scientists to design genetic tests to predict which patients might benefit from this treatment.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Fosfoproteínas/metabolismo , Factores de Empalme de ARN/metabolismo , Niño , Humanos , Quinasas Asociadas a Receptores de Interleucina-1/genética , Quinasas Asociadas a Receptores de Interleucina-1/metabolismo , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patología , Mutación , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/metabolismo , FN-kappa B/genética , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Empalme del ARNRESUMEN
Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is usually an incurable malignancy that needs newer therapeutic targets. Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP) is an innate immune mediator that regulates activation of pro-inflammatory and mitogenic signaling pathways. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays demonstrated expression of IL1RAP in majority of human PDAC specimens and in murine pancreatic tumors from K-RasG122D/p53R172H/PDXCre (KPC) mice. Single cell RNA-Seq analysis of human primary pre-neoplastic lesions and adenocarcinoma specimens indicated that overexpression occurs during carcinogenesis. IL1RAP overexpression was associated with worse overall survival. IL1RAP knockdown significantly reduced cell viability, invasiveness, and clonogenic growth in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Inhibition of the downstream interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) using two pharmacologic inhibitors, CA-4948 and PF06650833, resulted in reduced growth in pancreatic cancer cell lines and in xenograft models.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Proteína Accesoria del Receptor de Interleucina-1 , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Animales , Carcinogénesis , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Proteína Accesoria del Receptor de Interleucina-1/metabolismo , Ratones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between hormone therapy (HT) adherence and non-drug healthcare utilisation and healthcare costs among patients with breast cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: The US Medicare beneficiaries in the SEER-Medicare-linked database PARTICIPANTS: Women aged ≥ 65 with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer from 2007 through mid-2009 in the USA. INTERVENTIONS: We examined the relationship between HT and adherence and outcomes of our interests. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Our study cohort's HT adherence, non-drug healthcare utilisation and healthcare costs for the first year of HT and each year, thereafter, for a total of 5 years. RESULTS: 6045 eligible Medicare beneficiaries that met our selection criteria were included. We found that patients who were adherent to HT were associated with lower healthcare utilisation of all kinds (inpatient (0.35 vs 0.43, p<0.001), length of study during hospitalisation (4.19 vs 4.89, p<0.01), physician office visits (25.16 vs 26.17, p<0.001)), and significant reductions in many types of medical costs and neutral total healthcare costs despite the increased pharmacy costs. Half of the total medical cost reduction came from savings in hospitalisation costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the added cost of HT adherence was all but offset by the reduced cost for other medical care. Our study provides evidence on the potential success of implementing value-based insurance design (VBID) plans among patients with breast cancer to improve their long-term oral medication adherence. Policymakers should consider adherence improvement strategies such as VBID plans, given that the costs likely will not surpass the total savings.
Asunto(s)
Medicare , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Anciano , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Fimepinostat (CUDC-907), a first-in-class oral small-molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, demonstrated efficacy in a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large and high-grade B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL/HGBL), particularly those with increased MYC protein expression and/or MYC gene rearrangement/copy number gain (MYC-altered disease). Therefore, a phase 2 study of fimepinostat was conducted in this patient population with 66 eligible patients treated. The primary end-point of overall response (OR) rate for patients with MYC-IHC ≥40% (n = 46) was 15%. Subsequently, exploratory pooled analyses were performed including patients treated on both the phase 1 and 2 studies based upon the presence of MYC-altered disease as well as a biomarker identified by Virtual Inference of Protein activity by Enriched Regulon analysis (VIPER). For these patients with MYC-altered disease (n = 63), the overall response (OR) rate was 22% with seven responding patients remaining on treatment for approximately two years or longer, and VIPER yielded a three-protein biomarker classification with positive and negative predictive values of ≥85%. Prolonged durations of response were achieved by patients with MYC-altered R/R DLBCL/HGBL treated with single-agent fimepinostat. Combination therapies and/or biomarker-based patient selection strategies may lead to higher response rates in future clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Morfolinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/genética , Linfoma no Hodgkin/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfolinas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3/uso terapéutico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-myc/genética , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Seguridad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis of tumor genesis suggests that unlike most cancer cells within tumor CSC resist chemotherapy and can regenerate various cell types in tumor thereby causing relapse. Hence drugs that selectively target CSC may offer great promise for cancer therapy especially when combined with chemotherapy. Current treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) tumors rely on combination of surgical resection, cytotoxic and targeted drugs. Recent findings showed that metformin, an ant diabetic drug was associated with a significantly lower risk of CRC (0.63 [0.47 - 0.84]; P = 0.002) in patients with type 2 diabetes. We therefore hypothesize that administration of metformin will reduce CSC. METHODS: Patients with CRC and other GI cancers undergoing resection were enrolled. Metformin was administered at 500 mg orally twice daily for up to 14 days and terminated 24 hours, prior to planned surgery. Both tumor and normal tissue was procured. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE Version 3.0. Primary objective was to establish the safety of administering metformin prior to resection. Secondary objective was to evaluate the effects of metformin on the expression of CSC markers by measuring relative mRNA levels of CD133, OCT4 and NANOG by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients (4 Male; 6 Female) received metformin. Grade 3 AEs included anemia, hypoalbuminemia, alanine aminotransferase elevation, abdominal pain and nausea but none of these were related to metformin. No hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis were observed. No unexpected post-operative complications were witnessed. Comparison of markers of CCSC results showed that expression of CD133, OCT4 and NANOG expression were decreased following metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study showed feasibility of metformin before surgery in GI cancers and indicated impact on CSC. This preliminary data warrants further investigation in a larger randomized placebo-control study to assess these markers and their correlation with survival.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the different levels of copayment assistance and treatment adherence among Medicare and Medicaid dual eligible beneficiaries with breast cancer in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN: Propensity Score methodology was adopted to minimize potential selection bias from the nonrandom allocation of the treatment group (i.e., full Medicaid beneficiaries) and control group (i.e., Medicare Savings Programs [MSPs] beneficiaries). Longitudinal hierarchical model and Cox proportional-hazard model were adopted to examine patients' adherence over their full five-year course of adjuvant hormone therapy. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 1,133 dual eligible beneficiaries diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive early stage breast cancer in years 2007 -mid 2009. About 80.5% of them received MSPs benefits, while the rest received full Medicaid benefits. On average for a standardized 30-day hormone therapy medication, full Medicaid beneficiaries spent $0.5-$2.0 and MSP beneficiaries spent $1.4-$4.8 in copayment. After adjusting for other factors, this copayment reduction wasn't associated with a significantly better adherence. However, when the catastrophic coverage threshold was reached (copayments reduced to zero), significant improvement in adherence was found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that small amount of cost-sharing reduction did not affect Medicare and Medicaid dual eligible patients' medication treatment adherence, however, the elimination of cost-sharing (even a minimal amount) was associated with improved adherence. Future legislative and advocacy efforts should be paid on eliminating cost sharing for dual eligibles, and possibly even a broader group of financially vulnerable patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/métodos , Beneficios del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Deducibles y Coseguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have demonstrated association of metformin with reduced cancer incidence and mortality in multiple cancer types, including gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Anti-neoplastic effects of metformin are believed through many mechanisms including activation of AMP-activated protein kinase, which controls mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) growth regulatory pathway. METHODS: In a pilot, delayed-start randomized study, non-diabetic patients with GI cancers were randomized to 2 arms, Stage 1: concurrent metformin (500mg twice daily) plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone followed by cross over to metformin plus chemotherapy arm in Stage 2, while adverse events (DLT) were assessed by CTCAE v.3.0. As a translational correlate, we used phosphorylation of AMPKα at Thr172 to measure AMPK activation by western blot technique in PBMCs isolated from patients before and after receiving M. These levels were correlated with radiological (RECIST 1.1) and tumor marker outcomes by descriptive analysis. In this study, we present the sub-group analysis of patients with GI cancers. RESULTS: 41 patients with GI cancers (colorectal: 22, pancreatic: 12, gastroesophageal: 4, biliary: 2, others: 1) were treated in this trial. Mean duration of metformin therapy was 85 days (range: 9-443). There was no significant difference in grade 3 or above DLT in metformin plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy arm (14% vs. 12% respectively). Gel band density analysis on 19 patients showed that 63% patients had increased phosphorylation of AMPKα after metformin (ratio of phospho-AMPKα after and before metformin > 1) with mean = 1.227 (± 0.134). RECIST 1.1 restaging showed disease control in 55% patients and 45% patients had decline in tumor markers. Of note, 60% of patients with disease control also showed increase in phosphorylation of AMKα. CONCLUSIONS: This group of patients treated with metformin prospectively demonstrates the impact of metformin on AMPKα phosphorylation, and correlates with clinical benefit in patients with GI cancers when metformin was added to systemic chemotherapy of varying types. We aim to perform a dose-escalation of metformin in our next study with additional metabolomics correlates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) often are found to be inversely associated with adherence to medical treatment. The introduction of generic aromatase inhibitors (GAIs) significantly reduced the OOPCs of patients. The objective of the current study was to explore the impact of the introduction of GAIs on adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) adherence over the full course of breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Women aged ≥65 years who were diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from 2007 through mid-2009 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of AHT initiation and an interrupted time series model was used to predict the association between the introduction of GAIs and AHT adherence. The model was stratified further using Medicare low-income subsidy (LIS) status. RESULTS: A total of 10,905 women were included, approximately 62.8% of whom initiated AHT within the first year of their breast cancer diagnosis. Adjusted adherence among LIS beneficiaries was 11.4% higher than among non-LIS beneficiaries (P < .001). Non-LIS beneficiaries had an overall decreasing trend of adherence (-0.035; P < .001) prior to the introduction of GAIs. They experienced a 3.4% increase in the slope 6 months after the first GAI, anastrozole, entered the market, and an additional 0.8% increase in the slope 6 months after letrozole and exemestane were introduced (P < .001). Adherence change among LIS patients was small and statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: With the introduction of GAIs, the decrease trend of adherence to therapy atteunated over the course of treatment. Although the successful implementation of the Medicare LIS program minimized the OOPCs for financially vulnerable patients, policymakers should be cautious not to introduce disparities for those who may be of low income but ineligible for such a program.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastrozol/economía , Anastrozol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Medicare/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Metformin activates AMP-related pathways leading to inactivation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and suppression of its downstream effectors, crucial for cancer growth. Epidemiologic studies showed a reduced incidence and improved survival in cancer patients. We conducted a prospective phase I study to assess the safety of metformin in combination with chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors. METHODS: We conducted a delayed-start randomized trial of non-diabetic patients in two stages. In Stage 1, we randomized patients to two arms: concurrent arm (metformin with chemo) vs. delayed arm (chemo alone). In Stage 2, patients in delayed arm were crossed over to receive metformin. Patients received metformin 500 mg twice daily with chemotherapy to define dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in both stages. Secondary endpoints assessed adverse events (AEs) and response rates. Translational correlates included effects of metformin on expression and phosphorylation of 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) by western blot in PBMCs. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (51 in delayed arm vs. 49 concurrent arm). Rate of DLTs in patients receiving metformin with chemotherapy was 6.1% vs. 7.8% in patients receiving chemotherapy alone. DLTs seen with addition of metformin included those associated with established chemo adverse events. No lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia occurred. Restaging showed stable disease in 46% at cessation of metformin. 28% of patients with measurable tumor markers showed improvement. AMPK phosphorylation showed a four- to sixfold increase in AMPK phosphorylation after metformin. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest phase I study of metformin combined with chemotherapy, which suggests that metformin can be given safely with chemotherapy, and offers a platform for future studies. Post-metformin increase in AMPK phosphorylation may potentially explain lack of disease progression in nearly half of our patients. FUNDING: UL1 TR001064. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT01442870.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Metformina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Quinasas Activadas por AMP/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Esquema de Medicación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Metformina/farmacocinética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/patología , Fosforilación/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metformina/farmacología , Estados Unidos , VeteranosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metformin has been associated with improved colorectal cancer survival, but investigations are limited by small numbers of patients and confounding by diabetic severity. We examined the association between metformin use and overall survival (OS) in patients with diabetes and colorectal cancer in a large population of U.S. veterans, while adjusting for measures of diabetic severity. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer from January 2001 to December 2008 were identified from the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry. Multivariable models were used to examine the adjusted association of OS with diabetes and use of antidiabetic medications. RESULTS: There were 21,352 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer identified (n = 16,355 nondiabetic patients, n = 2,038 diabetic patients on metformin, n = 2,136 diabetic patients on medications other than metformin, n = 823 diabetic patients not on antidiabetic medication). Diabetic patients had a significantly worse OS than nondiabetic patients, but metformin users had only a 10% increase in death (HRadj 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17, P = 0.004), as compared with 22% for users of other antidiabetic medications (HRadj 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.29, P < 0.0001). Among colorectal cancer patients with diabetes, metformin users had a 13% improved OS versus patients taking other antidiabetic medications (HRadj 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95, P = 0.003), while diabetic patients not on any antidiabetic medications did not differ with respect to OS (HRadj 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetics with colorectal cancer, metformin use is associated with improved survival, despite adjustments for diabetes severity and other risk factors. IMPACT: These data lend further support to the conduct of randomized studies of possible anticancer effects of metformin among patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(10); 1418-25. ©2016 AACR.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , VeteranosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tivantinib combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used. At the RP2D, expansion cohorts in 5 tumor types could be enrolled. Pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic analysis were performed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients received the study treatment. The combination had no unexpected toxicities. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AE) were rash (40 %), diarrhea (38 %), and anorexia (33 %). The RP2D was tivantinib 360 mg BID and sorafenib 400 mg BID for all cancer histologies, except in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients tivantinib was 240 mg BID plus sorafenib 400 mg BID. The overall response rate was 12 % in all patients, 26 % in melanoma, 15 % in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 10 % in HCC, and 0 % in other patients. Disease control rate (CR, PR and SD ≥8 weeks) was 58 % in all patients, 90 % in RCC, 65 % in HCC, 63 % in melanoma, 40 % in breast cancer, and 8 % in NSCLC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment could be administered at full standard single-agent doses in all patients except those with HCC, where tivantinib was lowered to 240 mg BID. Preliminary evidence of anticancer activity was observed in patients with RCC, HCC, and melanoma, including patients refractory to sorafenib and/or other anti-VEGF pathway therapies. The combination treatment has therapeutic potential in treating a variety of solid tumors.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/farmacocinética , Niacinamida/farmacología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacocinética , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacología , Polimorfismo Genético , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-met/metabolismo , Pirrolidinonas/administración & dosificación , Pirrolidinonas/efectos adversos , Pirrolidinonas/farmacocinética , Pirrolidinonas/farmacología , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/farmacología , Sorafenib , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Once a promising drug target is identified, the steps to actually discover and optimize a drug are diverse and challenging. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to provide a road map to navigate drug discovery. METHODS: Review general steps for drug discovery and provide illustrating references. RESULTS: A number of approaches are available to enhance and accelerate target identification and validation. Consideration of a variety of potential mechanisms of action of potential drugs can guide discovery efforts. The hit to lead stage may involve techniques such as high-throughput screening, fragment-based screening, and structure-based design, with informatics playing an ever-increasing role. Biologically relevant screening models are discussed, including cell lines, 3-dimensional culture, and in vivo screening. The process of enabling human studies for an investigational drug is also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Drug discovery is a complex process that has significantly evolved in recent years.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Drogas en Investigación/farmacología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Línea Celular Tumoral , Biología Computacional , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Ensayos de Selección de Medicamentos Antitumorales , Drogas en Investigación/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas Oncogénicas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas Oncogénicas/metabolismo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have associated metformin use with lower colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence but few studies have examined metformin's influence on CRC survival. We examined the relationships among metformin use, diabetes, and survival in postmenopausal women with CRC in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials and observational study. METHODS: 2066 postmenopausal women with CRC were followed for a median of 4.1 years, with 589 deaths after CRC diagnosis from all causes and 414 deaths directly attributed to CRC. CRC-specific survival was compared among women with diabetes with metformin use (n=84); women with diabetes with no metformin use (n=128); and women without diabetes (n=1854). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate associations among metformin use, diabetes and survival after CRC. Strategies to adjust for potential confounders included: multivariate adjustment with known predictors of colorectal cancer survival and construction of a propensity score for the likelihood of receiving metformin, with model stratification by propensity score quintile. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and stage, CRC specific survival in women with diabetes with metformin use was not significantly different compared to that in women with diabetes with no metformin use (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.40-1.38, p=0.67) and to women without diabetes (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.61-1.66, p=0.99). Following propensity score adjustment, the HR for CRC-specific survival in women with diabetes with metformin use compared to non-users was 0.78 (95% CI 0.38-1.55, p=0.47) and for overall survival was 0.86 (95% CI 0.49-1.52; p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with CRC and DM, no statistically significant difference was seen in CRC specific survival in those who used metformin compared to non-users. Analyses in larger populations of colorectal cancer patients are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Regulatory approval of oncology drugs is the cornerstone of the development process and approval characteristics shape eventual utilization. Approval trends and characteristics provide valuable information for drug developers and regulators and ultimately affect clinicians and patients. METHODS: Indication characteristics were tabulated for drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for systemic therapy of malignancies from 1949 through October 2011. Variables included time to approval, initial/supplemental indication, tumor type, stage of disease, specification of protein expression or genetic information, drug class, trial design, concomitant agent, trial size, and endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 121 unique anticancer agents, including 242 unique indications, were approved. The number of trials for each indication has decreased; however, trial size has increased and more randomized controlled trials have been performed. Trial designs have increasingly used time-to-event endpoints and rarely have used symptom-based primary endpoints. Approvals have been primarily single agent, with less emphasis on palliative treatments and increasing emphasis on advanced disease stages and requirements for prior therapy. Molecular specifications in labels have increased, but they are present in less than 30% of recent indications and are not associated with shorter approval times. CONCLUSION: Approval of oncology agents is occurring in increasingly more challenging settings, suggesting gaps between eventual practice and development in potentially suboptimal indications. Molecular specifications promise to enhance development, yet widespread use in label indications has not yet been achieved.
Asunto(s)
Anticarcinógenos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In carcinogenesis, methylation of DNA promoter regions results in inactivation of tumor-suppressing genes. MG98 was designed to inhibit DNA methyltransferases enzyme 1 production. METHODS: This multicenter study explored two schedules of MG98 with Interferon-α-2ß to identify schedule and dose for patients with metastatic RCC. RESULTS: Doses of IFN 9 MIU/MG98 125 mg/m(2) for a continuous schedule and IFN 9 MIU/MG98 200 mg/m(2) for an intermittent schedule were considered the MTDs. Treatment resulted in one PR and eight SD. CONCLUSION: MG98 combined with IFN was safe and resulted in clinical activity.