RESUMEN

Appropriate professional practice includes the diagnostic and treatment process of urologic pathology, as well as patient information and respect for patient autonomy in decision making. Informed consent is the gradual process of providing information to the patient and their subsequent decision making. The informed consent document (ICD), when required, demonstrates that information has been provided sufficiently in advance to allow for the patient's deliberation. The dual need for simple yet complete documents make the preparation of adequate ICDs extremely difficult. If the information process is not carried out properly, the professional may incur a medical malpractice liability that is treated as a loss of opportunity. To avoid such situations, the work of scientific societies in the preparation, accessibility, and dissemination of ICD models is fundamental.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Evaluar la atención en Urgencias por torsión testicular en reclamaciones por responsabilidad profesional médica.MétodoSe extrajeron las reclamaciones relacionadas con torsión testicular del 2000 al 2018, analizando la asistencia dispensada y la asociación con responsabilidad profesional médica.ResultadosSe identificaron 80 reclamaciones, registrándose como síntoma principal el dolor testicular en el 83,75% de las primeras asistencias, con 15,5h de evolución media. El tiempo hasta el diagnóstico fue de 7,98 días de media. La primera consulta fue hospitalaria en el 75,1% de los casos, pero solo en el 7,5% se realizó ecografía. Cuando se diagnosticó la torsión testicular, se hizo uso de pruebas complementarias en el 97,3% de los casos. La responsabilidad profesional médica se asoció significativamente con la vía de reclamación no penal y con cuadros de menos de 6h de evolución, y dentro de este subgrupo, con la no realización de ecografía.ConclusionesSe reclaman consultas tardías, el error y el retraso en el diagnóstico. Cuando la reclamación es por vía no penal, es frecuente que se considere la existencia de responsabilidad, y más en los casos en que la consulta fue antes de las 6h y sin haber realizado prueba complementaria alguna. (AU)

Objective: To evaluate emergency care for testicular torsion in medical professional liability claims.MethodClaims related to testicular torsion from 2000 to 2018 were located. The assistance provided and the association with medical professional liability were analyzed.ResultsEighty complaints were identified, testicular pain was reported in 83.75% of first consultations, with a mean evolution time of 15.5h. The mean time to diagnosis was 7.98 days. The first consultation was at the hospital in 75.1% of cases, but an ultrasound was performed only in 7.5%. When testicular torsion diagnosis was performed, 97.3% had undergone ancillary tests. The medical professional liability was significantly associated with non-criminal proceedings and with less than 6h of symptoms’ evolution, and, within this subgroup, without undergoing an ultrasound scan.ConclusionsLate consultations, wrong diagnosis and late diagnosis are claimed. When medical professional liability are claimed by means of non-criminal law, the existence of responsibility is frequently considered, even more in those cases when the consultation took place before 6h of evolution with no ancillary tests having been performed. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate emergency care for testicular torsion (TT) in medical professional liability (MPL) claims. METHODS: Claims related to TT from 2000 to 2018 were located. The assistance provided and the association with MPL were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty complaints were identified, testicular pain was reported in 83.75% of first consultations, with a mean evolution time of 15.5 h. The mean time to diagnosis was 7.98 days. The first consultation was at the hospital in 75.1% of cases, but an ultrasound was performed only in 7.5%. When TT diagnosis was performed, 97.3% had undergone ancillary tests. The MPL was significantly associated with non-criminal proceedings and with less than 6 h of symptoms' evolution, and, within this subgroup, without undergoing an ultrasound scan. CONCLUSIONS: Late consultations, wrong diagnosis and late diagnosis are claimed. When MPL are claimed by means of non-criminal law, the existence of responsibility is frequently considered, even more in those cases when the consultation took place before 6 h of evolution with no ancillary tests having been performed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

La práctica de la teledermatología (TD) durante la pandemia de COVID-19 ha facilitado la atención dermatológica especializada en una situación de crisis, evitando desplazamientos innecesarios, sin poner en riesgo la seguridad de pacientes y dermatólogos. Sin embargo, también ha puesto en evidencia distintos aspectos éticos y médico-legales que plantea esta práctica médica. La consulta médica no presencial constituye un acto médico, aplicándosele todas las consideraciones y consecuencias éticas y médico-legales de cualquier relación médico-paciente. Debe garantizarse el derecho a la autonomía del paciente, el secreto profesional, la protección de datos, la intimidad y la confidencialidad. El paciente debe aceptar la TD, mediante el consentimiento informado, considerando de interés establecer una cláusula de salvaguarda. Se precisan pautas de actuación bien definidas y una legislación uniforme para preservar una máxima seguridad de los datos transferidos, así como una formación adecuada para prevenir posibles situaciones de lo que podría denominarse «telemalpraxis»

Teledermatology has facilitated specialist care during the crisis caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, eliminating unnecessary office visits and the possible exposure of patients or dermatologists. However, teledermatology brings forward certain ethical and medicolegal questions. A medical consultation in which the patient is not physically present is still a medical act, to which all the usual ethical and medicolegal considerations and consequences apply. The patient's right to autonomy and privacy, confidentiality, and data protection must be guaranteed. The patient must agree to remote consultation by giving informed consent, for which a safeguard clause should be included. Well-defined practice guidelines and uniform legislation are required to preserve the highest level of safety for transferred data. Adequate training is also needed to prevent circumstances involving what might be termed «telemalpractice»

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Teledermatology has facilitated specialist care during the crisis caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, eliminating unnecessary office visits and the possible exposure of patients or dermatologists. However, teledermatology brings forward certain ethical and medicolegal questions. A medical consultation in which the patient is not physically present is still a medical act, to which all the usual ethical and medicolegal considerations and consequences apply. The patient's right to autonomy and privacy, confidentiality, and data protection must be guaranteed. The patient must agree to remote consultation by giving informed consent, for which a safeguard clause should be included. Well-defined practice guidelines and uniform legislation are required to preserve the highest level of safety for transferred data. Adequate training is also needed to prevent circumstances involving what might be termed «telemalpractice¼.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: La urología es una especialidad de riesgo medio de reclamación. Recibir una reclamación por responsabilidad profesional médica es una experiencia estresante con importantes repercusiones. El objetivo de este estudio fue valorar el impacto de dichas reclamaciones sobre los urólogos españoles. METODOLOGÍA: Se diseñó una encuesta sobre responsabilidad profesional médica en urología. La Asociación Española de Urología y la Fundación para la Investigación en Urología aprobaron la encuesta, facilitando su realización mediante la herramienta PIEM por vía electrónica. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron 202 respuestas (tasa de 11,6%). El 25,24% reportaron haber sido reclamados en alguna ocasión. El 88% refirieron una afectación del estado de ánimo tras ser reclamados, siendo del 100% en la vía penal. El grado de afectación emocional reportado fue máximo en el inicio del proceso y fue decreciendo hasta su resolución. El 67,9% consideró una afectación en la relación médico-paciente y un 71,4% reconocieron un cambio en el ejercicio de la profesión, aumentando la medicina defensiva. Un 6,7% consideró abandonar el ejercicio de la profesión. DISCUSIÓN: La tasa de respuesta obtenida y las actuaciones médicas que motivan las reclamaciones fueron similares a las obtenidas en una encuesta similar realizada en Estados Unidos. Se confirma que las reclamaciones son percibidas como situaciones muy estresantes, pudiendo dar lugar al fenómeno de la segunda víctima o al síndrome clínico judicial, por lo que deben destinarse esfuerzos a la formación en dicha materia y a programas que traten las consecuencias derivadas de dicha situación

INTRODUCTION: Urology is a specialty of medium risk of claim. Receiving a claim for medical professional liability is a stressful experience with significant repercussions. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of these claims on Spanish urologists. METHODOLOGY: A survey on medical professional liability in urology was designed. The Spanish Association of Urology and the Urological Research Foundation approved the questionnaire, generated by the PIEM online tool. RESULTS: The total number of responses obtained was 202 (11.6% rate), of which 25.24% reported having been claimed, 88% reported mood changes after being claimed, 100% in criminal proceedings. The level of emotional involvement reported was the highest at the beginning of the process and progressively decreasing until its resolution. An affected doctor-patient relationship was considered in 67.9% of cases and 71.4% acknowledged increased defensive medicine in their professional practice. A percentage of 6.7% considered leaving the profession. DISCUSSION: The response rate obtained and the medical acts motivating the claims were comparable to those obtained in a similar survey conducted in the United States. The fact that claims are perceived as very stressful situations and may give rise to the phenomenon of the second victim or to the clinical judicial syndrome is clear, so efforts should be devoted to develop training in this matter and programs that address the consequences derived from these situations

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Urology is a specialty of medium risk of claim. Receiving a claim for medical professional liability is a stressful experience with significant repercussions. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of these claims on Spanish urologists. METHODOLOGY: A survey on medical professional liability in urology was designed. The Spanish Association of Urology and the Urological Research Foundation approved the questionnaire, generated by the PIEM online tool. RESULTS: The total number of responses obtained was 202 (11.6% rate), of which 25.24% reported having been claimed, 88% reported mood changes after being claimed, 100% in criminal proceedings. The level of emotional involvement reported was the highest at the beginning of the process and progressively decreasing until its resolution. An affected doctor-patient relationship was considered in 67.9% of cases and 71.4% acknowledged increased defensive medicine in their professional practice. A percentage of 6.7% considered leaving the profession. DISCUSSION: The response rate obtained and the medical acts motivating the claims were comparable to those obtained in a similar survey conducted in the United States. The fact that claims are perceived as very stressful situations and may give rise to the phenomenon of the second victim or to the clinical judicial syndrome is clear, so efforts should be devoted to develop training in this matter and programs that address the consequences derived from these situations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

El uso de la fotografía, necesario en el ejercicio de la dermatología, conlleva unas implicaciones médico-legales y bioéticas que deben conocerse y cumplirse. Éticamente destacan los principios de autonomía y de no maleficencia. Jurídicamente deben diferenciarse 2 sustratos distintos de protección: el derecho a la propia imagen y la protección de los datos de carácter personal, donde ha habido recientemente modificaciones legislativas que condicionan la actuación ante la obtención y exhibición de fotografías. En la obtención no se plantean dudas jurídicas dado que la fotografía es un elemento más en la historia clínica del paciente, recomendándose únicamente informar al respecto. Para la exhibición docente o científica de fotografías debe distinguirse si la fotografía permite o no identificar al paciente. Solo si el paciente puede ser identificado es necesario disponer de una autorización expresa y específica para dicha exhibición. Se recomienda un uso prudente de la fotografía médica en redes sociales

Photographs are necessary in the clinical practice of dermatology, but there are ethical implications to consider. Moreover, dermatologists must be aware of and comply with certain legal requirements affecting the use of photographs. The main ethical principles are respect for patient autonomy and the physician's obligation to do no harm. The law differentiates between 2 bases for protection: one concerns the photographed person's rights over the image and the other protects personal data. Recent legislation places restrictions on taking photographs and exhibiting them. Photographs taken to be stored with a medical history have not been called into question, but the physician is recommended to inform the patient that they exist. When a photograph is exhibited for the purpose of teaching or illustrating concepts, it is necessary to determine whether or not the patient can be identified. If the answer is yes, the patient must give explicit permission. Caution should be exercised when publishing medical photographs on social media

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Photographs are necessary in the clinical practice of dermatology, but there are ethical implications to consider. Moreover, dermatologists must be aware of and comply with certain legal requirements affecting the use of photographs. The main ethical principles are respect for patient autonomy and the physician's obligation to do no harm. The law differentiates between 2 bases for protection: one concerns the photographed person's rights over the image and the other protects personal data. Recent legislation places restrictions on taking photographs and exhibiting them. Photographs taken to be stored with a medical history have not been called into question, but the physician is recommended to inform the patient that they exist. When a photograph is exhibited for the purpose of teaching or illustrating concepts, it is necessary to determine whether or not the patient can be identified. If the answer is yes, the patient must give explicit permission. Caution should be exercised when publishing medical photographs on social media.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)