RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Biopsies of peripheral nerve tumors (PNTs) are often used to plan an efficient treatment strategy. However, performing a biopsy is controversial when the mass is likely to be a benign PNT (BPNT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the side effects of biopsies in patients with potential PNTs. METHODS: A retrospective and cross-sectional study was conducted on 24 patients who underwent biopsy of a mass of unknown origin potentially originating from a peripheral nerve (MUOPON), performed in nonspecialty services, and who were later referred to the authors' service for resection of their lesion between January 2005 and December 2022. The patients were evaluated for pain score, presence of a motor or sensory deficit, biopsy diagnosis, and definitive histopathological postsurgical diagnosis. RESULTS: The location of the tumor was supraclavicular in 7 (29.2%) patients, in the axillary region in 3 (12.5%), in the upper limb in 7 (29.2%), and in the lower limb in 7 (29.2%). Twenty-one (87.5%) patients were evaluated by MRI before biopsy, and 3 (12.5%) underwent ultrasound. One patient did not have an examination before the procedure. Based on the biopsy findings, 12 (50%) analyses had an inconclusive histopathological result. The preexisting pain worsened, as measured 1 week after biopsy, in all patients and had remained unchanged at the first evaluation by the authors (median 3 months, range 2-4 months). In 1 case, the open biopsy had to be interrupted because the patient experienced excruciating pain. Four (16.7%) patients developed motor deficits. Subsequent surgery was hampered by scar formation and intratumoral hemorrhage in 5 (20.8%) patients. The initial diagnosis obtained by biopsy differed from the final histopathological diagnosis in all patients, of whom 21 (87.5%) had BPNTs, 2 (8.3%) malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and 1 (4.2%) an ancient schwannoma. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsies of PNTs are controversial and may result in misdiagnosis, neuropathic pain, or neurological deficit due to axonal damage, and they may also hinder microsurgical resection when if performed when not indicated. Indications for biopsy of an MUOPON must be carefully considered, especially if BPNT is a possible diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vaina del Nervio , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vaina del Nervio/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/cirugía , Nervios Periféricos/patología , Errores Diagnósticos , DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are devastating lesions, and neurotization is an usually elected surgical therapy. The phrenic nerve has been harvested as a motor fibers donor in brachial plexus neurotization, showing great results in terms of motor reinnervation. Unfortunately, these interventions lack solid evidence regarding long-term safety and possible late respiratory function sequelae, raising crescent concerns after the COVID-19 pandemic onset and possibly resulting in reduced propensity to use this technique. The study of the distal anatomy of the phrenic nerves may lead to a better understanding of their branching patterns, and thus the proposition of surgical approaches that better preserve patient respiratory function. METHODS: Twenty-one phrenic nerves in 10 formalized cadavers were scrutinized. Prediaphragmatic branching patterns were inspected through analysis of the distance between the piercing site of the nerve at the diaphragm and the cardiac structures, number of divisions, and length from the point where the main trunk emits its branches to the diaphragm. RESULTS: The main trunk of the right phrenic nerve reaches the diaphragm near the inferior vena cava and branches into 3 major divisions. The left phrenic nerve reaches the diaphragm in variable locations near the heart, branching into 2-5 main trunks. Moreover, we noticed a specimen presenting 2 ipsilateral parallel phrenic nerves. CONCLUSIONS: The right phrenic nerve presented greater consistency concerning insertion site, terminal branching point distance to this muscle, and number of rami than the left phrenic nerve.