RESUMEN

Background: Intact awareness facilitates an individual's adoption of strategies to support community living skills. However, most studies have not examined awareness during ongoing complex task performance. Objective: To examine whether community-dwelling adult's Accuracy and Strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity 17-item version (WCPA-17), Total Cues on the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills Checkbook Balancing and Shopping Task (PCST), and scores on the self-report Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) differ between groups who do and do not demonstrate awareness of performance difficulties on the WCPA-17. Methods: Using data collected as part of a larger study we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 274 community-dwelling adults aged 55 to 93 years. Two methods classified participants into groups aware or unaware of their performance. Independent sample t-tests examined group differences on four dependent variables: Accuracy and Strategy use on the WCPA-17, PCST Total Cues, and score on the ADCS-ADL. Results: Using one classification method, aware individuals showed superior Accuracy (p < 0.001), used more Strategies (p = 0.002), needed fewer PCST Total Cues (p < 0.001), and reported greater independence on the ADCS-ADL (p < 0.004), similar trends were observed with the other method in Accuracy (p < 0.001) and PCST Total Cues (p < 0.001) but Strategy use and ADCS-ADL differences failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction. Conclusion: Groups categorized as aware performed better on all measures. Intact awareness is critical to performance on complex everyday activities and can be evaluated with functional cognition assessments.

RESUMEN

Background: Early identification of subtle cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults is critical, as mild cognitive impairment contributes to disability and can be a precursor to dementia. The clock drawing test (CDT) is a widely adopted cognitive screening measure for dementia, however, the reliability and validity of paper-and-pencil CDT scoring scales for mild cognitive impairment in community samples of older adults is less well established. We examined the reliability, sensitivity and specificity, and construct validity of two free-drawn clock drawing test scales-the Rouleau System and the Clock Drawing Interpretation Scale (CDIS)-for subtle cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: We analyzed Rouleau and CDIS scores of 310 community-dwelling older adults who had MoCA scores of 20 or above. For each scale we computed Cronbach's alpha, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for sensitivity and specificity using the MoCA as the index measure, and item response theory models for difficulty level. Results: Our sample was 75% female and 85% Caucasian with a mean education of 16 years. The Rouleau scale had excellent interrater reliability (94%), poor internal consistency [0.37 (0.48)], low sensitivity (0.59) and moderate specificity (0.71) at a score of 9. The CDIS scale had good interrater reliability (88%), moderate internal consistency [0.66 (0.09)], moderate sensitivity (0.78) and low specificity (0.45) at a score of 19. In the item response models, both scales' total scores gave the most information at lower cognitive levels. Conclusion: In our community-dwelling sample, the CDIS's psychometric properties were better in most respects than the Rouleau for use as a screening instrument. Both scales provide valuable information to clinicians screening older adults for cognitive change, but should be interpreted in the setting of a global cognitive battery and not as stand-alone instruments.

RESUMEN

Background. The Menu Task (MT) is an occupational therapy screening measure designed to identify people in need of functional cognitive (FC) assessment. Purpose. To explore whether test-taker strategy selection on the MT is clinically informative. Methods. Using a cross-sectional design we administered assessments of FC including the MT and the After MT interview, cognitive screening measures, and self-report instrumental activities of daily living assessment to a convenience sample of 55 community-dwelling adults. After MT interviews responses were qualitatively characterized as (a) loss of set (e.g., not recognizing that food preferences are irrelevant to task performance), (b) calorie counting, or (c) planning. Findings. Loss of set was associated with poorer performance on most study measures, calorie counting was associated with superior performance on most study measures, and no differences were observed relating to planning. Implications. Determining the test-takers approach to the MT adds information to that provided by the MT itself.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Occupational therapists need a brief tool to identify the potential for functional cognitive deficits leading to impaired occupational performance. The objective is to establish the sensitivity and specificity, concurrent and known-group validity of the Menu Task by comparison with performance on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA). Using a cross-sectional design, we administered the Menu Task and the WCPA to a community-dwelling convenience sample of 287 adults aged from 55 to 93 years. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis estimated sensitivity and specificity. Concurrent and known-group construct validity was examined by comparing scores on the Menu Task with the WCPA scores. As a result, a new cutoff score of 9 was established for the Menu Task (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.80, sensitivity = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.73, 0.97]; specificity = 0.58, 95% CI = [0.52, 0.64]). Both concurrent and construct validity were supported. The Menu Task demonstrates sensitivity to functional cognitive impairments in a community sample.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Occupational therapy's focus on functional cognition offers a distinct approach to the assessment of and intervention for occupational performance deficits that may follow coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although the majority of people survive COVID-19, many people experience persistent functional cognitive sequelae severe enough to interfere with occupational performance. After COVID-19, people may be categorized as either (1) those who experience severe or critical illness requiring hospitalization or (2) those with mild to moderate presentations of the virus without hospitalization. A third group of those who do not have ongoing signs of active infection but who experience new, lasting, or deteriorating symptoms has begun to emerge and may represent a distinct COVID-19 long-haul syndrome. By following the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework and using established processes for occupational therapy assessment and treatment of functional cognition, occupational therapy practitioners can tailor assessments and interventions to meet clients' needs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Identification of functional cognitive deficits can facilitate intervention to improve outcomes among older adults. We aimed to determine if impairments on screening tests of cognition are associated with deficits in performance on a more extensive functional cognitive assessment. Using a cross-sectional study design we administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Mini-Cog, the Menu Task, and Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA) to a convenience sample of 277 community-dwelling older adults (55-93 years old). We created impaired and unimpaired groups using an established cut-off score for each screening test and compared each group on WCPA scores. The WCPA scores that demonstrated significant differences across screening measures were: Accuracy, Efficiency, Strategies, Rules, and Appointments Entered. Effect sizes for the WCPA scores Accuracy and Efficiency were large. Each screening test demonstrated discriminant validity on select WCPA scores and appear to be appropriate for use as screening tests of functional cognition.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the adequacy of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) compared with other screening tools in identifying individuals with limitations in functional cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Midsized midwestern city. PARTICIPANTS: We assessed a convenience sample of community dwelling individuals (N=197) aged 55 years and older who were living independently. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant scores on the BIMS, Mini-Cog, Menu Task, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were compared with the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Checkbook Balancing and Shopping tasks (PCST), which are known to predict impairment in complex IADLs associated with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for participant demographics, as well as sensitivity and specificity, were computed for each screening measure using the PCST as the criterion measure. RESULTS: The Mini-Cog, Menu Task, and MoCA identified 25.89%, 32.49%, and 47.21% more individuals, respectively, as impaired than the BIMS. In multiple logistical regression analyses, the BIMS correctly identified 58% of those impaired on the PCST. However, each of the alternate screening measures correctly identified at least 70% of individuals as impaired on the PCST. CONCLUSIONS: In this community sample, the BIMS was insensitive to subtle impairments with the potential to compromise community living, suggesting that the BIMS may be inappropriate for use outside nursing home settings.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: The identification of functional performance deficits is critical to the community independence of older adults. We examined whether a combined cognitive and performance-based medication management measure would be able to better classify an individual's functional cognitive status and potential for instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) impairment than either measure alone. Research Design and Methods: Community-dwelling adults age 55 and older (n = 185) were administered the Mini-Cog, the Medication Transfer Screen-Revised (MTS-R), a combination measure the Medi-Cog-Revised (Medi-Cog-R), the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS) Checkbook Balancing and Shopping tasks (PCST), additional cognitive screening measures, and a self-report daily living scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were computed for the Mini-Cog, MTS-R and the Medi-Cog-R using the PCST performance as the criterion measure. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were computed for each measure. Results: The Medi-Cog-R most accurately identified individuals as impaired on the PCST. An AUC statistic of 0.82 for the Medi-Cog-R was greater than either the Mini-Cog (0.75) or the MTS-R (0.73). The Medi-Cog-R demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.78 in classifying individuals with impaired IADL as measured by the PCST. Discussion and Implications: The Mini-Cog, the MTS-R, and the Medi-Cog-R all show discriminant validity, but the combined measure demonstrates greater sensitivity and specificity than either component measure alone in identifying IADL impairment. The Medi-Cog-R appears to be a useful screening measure for functional cognition and can be used to prompt further assessment and intervention to promote community independence.