RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The oral complications associated with radiotherapy to the head and neck are a significant dose-limiting factor. The goals of this study were to determine whether oropharyngeal rinsing and ingestion of misoprostol protect mucous membranes from the acute effects of irradiation, and to evaluate the quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes of patients receiving misoprostol. We report the results of the QOL outcomes of patients in this study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 33 patients with resected or intact cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, supraglottic larynx, or hypopharynx were registered to receive postoperative radiotherapy plus misoprostol or primary radiotherapy plus misoprostol. All patients were scheduled to receive 60-70 Gy at 2 Gy/d within 6-7 weeks. QOL and function were evaluated. RESULTS: A decrease in the QOL and function occurred in all areas covered by the questionnaire at the 6-week interval. This decrease was significant for eating, saliva, taste, and mucous. Of these significant factors, taste, saliva, and mucous consistency had not resolved by 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Increased understanding of the impact of treatment on QOL and symptoms will formulate the rational design of toxicity interventions and enhance the multidisciplinary care of head-and-neck patients.
Asunto(s)
Alprostadil/análogos & derivados , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Mucosa Bucal/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Boca/prevención & control , Membrana Mucosa/efectos de la radiación , Faringe/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Boca/radioterapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/prevención & control , Neoplasias Faríngeas/radioterapia , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
EC film has improved portal localization images with better contrast and improved distinction of bony structures and air-tissue interfaces. A cassette with slower speed screens was used with EC film to image the treatment portal during the entire course of treatment (verification) instead of taking separate films after treatment. Measurements of film density vs source to film distance (SFD) were made using 15 and 25 cm thick water phantoms with both 6 and 18 MV photons from I to 40 cm past the phantom. A characteristic (H & D) curve was measured in air to compare dose to film density. Results show the reduction in radiation between patient and cassette more closely follows an "inverse cube law" rather than an inverse square law. Formulas to calculate radiation exposure to the film, and the desired SFD were based on patient tumor dose, calculation of the exit dose, and the inverse cube relationship. A table of exposure techniques based on the SFD for a given tumor dose was evaluated and compared to conventional techniques. Although the film has a high contrast, there is enough latitude that excellent films can be achieved using a fixed SFD based simply on the tumor dose and beam energy. Patient diameter has a smaller effect. The benefits of imaging portal films during the entire treatment are more reliability in the accuracy of the portal image, ability to detect patient motion, and reduction in the time it takes to take portal images.