Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
2.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 175(6): 367-376, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922589

RESUMEN

Several studies have demonstrated that stroke subjects present impairment of functions related to decision-making and timing, involving the information processing in the neural circuits of the cerebellum in association with the prefrontal cortex. This review is aimed to identify the gaps, and demonstrate a better understanding of decision-making and timing functions in the patients with stroke. Electronic literature database was searched and the findings of relevant studies were used to explore the mechanisms of decision-making and timing in patients with stroke, as well as the circuit connections in timing mediated by prefrontal cortex and cerebellum. A literature review was conducted with 65 studies that synthesized findings on decision-making and time perception in individuals with stroke. Types of neurobiological modalities in this study included: Relationships among decision-making, time perception, related cognitive aspects (such as discrimination tasks, verbal estimation, bisection tasks, time production and motor reproduction), and motor control. We demonstrate that the timing processes are important for the performance in cognitive tasks and that the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex are involved in decision-making and time perception. In the context, the decision-making is impaired in stroke patients has a great impact on executive functions, and this seems to be important in determining neurobiological aspects relevant to the time interval interpretation.


Asunto(s)
Conducta/fisiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Toma de Decisiones/fisiología , Vías Nerviosas/fisiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Percepción del Tiempo/fisiología , Cerebelo/patología , Cerebelo/fisiología , Cognición/fisiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Humanos , Corteza Prefrontal/patología , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/psicología
3.
Adv Dent Res ; 24(1): 16-21, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22261258

RESUMEN

The caries-preventive benefits of fluoride are generally accepted by dental researchers and practicing professionals worldwide. The benefits of fluoride toothpastes and mouthrinses have been supported by several high-quality systematic reviews. The formulation of a fluoride toothpaste and biological (salivary flow rate) and behavioral factors (brushing frequency, brushing time, post-brushing rinsing practices, timing of brushing, and amount of toothpaste applied) can influence anticaries efficacy. Fluoride mouthrinses have simpler formulations and can have better oral fluoride retention profiles than fluoride toothpastes, depending on post-brushing rinsing behaviors. Fluoride continues to be the mainstay of caries control; however, there is still the need to determine the most effective approach for fluoride utilization in children and adults who remain caries-active.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/administración & dosificación , Antisépticos Bucales/administración & dosificación , Autoadministración , Pastas de Dientes/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Asia , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Cepillado Dental
4.
J Affect Disord ; 134(1-3): 77-84, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21684613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The health burden associated with comorbid depression and diabetes in older community residents in middle income countries is unclear. METHODS: Data came from a statewide representative sample (N = 6963, age ≥ 60) in Brazil. Controlled polytomous logistic regression was used to determine whether four mutually exclusive groups (all possible combinations of the presence or absence of depression and diabetes) differed in sociodemographic characteristics, social resources, health behaviors, and selected health conditions. RESULTS: While 2.37% were expected to have comorbid depression/diabetes given sample base rates (depression: 20.92% [1457/6963]; diabetes: 11.35% [790/6959]), comorbidity was present in 3.62% (52.5% beyond expectation; P<0.0001; OR = 1.58, 95% Confidence Interval 1.29-1.95). Depression without diabetes was reported by 17.3%, and diabetes without depression by 7.7%. In controlled analyses, the depression group had poorer socioeconomic status and health behaviors, and a greater likelihood of vascular, respiratory, and musculoskeletal problems than the diabetes group. Vascular, respiratory, and urinary problems were exacerbated in comorbid depression/diabetes; the comorbid group was also more likely to be female and younger. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study that explicitly reports on all four possible depression/diabetes combinations in an older representative community-resident sample, using controlled analyses to identify unique associations with sociodemographic characteristics and other health conditions. The burden of comorbid depression/diabetes in Brazil, a middle income country, appears to be comparable to that found in higher income countries. So, similarly, depression without diabetes had a greater odds of adverse sociodemographic and health conditions than diabetes without depression; comorbid depression/diabetes was more likely in women and young elderly, and the odds of vascular, respiratory, and urinary conditions was increased significantly. Attention to comorbid depression/diabetes as a unique entity is needed.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Anciano , Brasil/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clase Social
5.
Adv Dent Res ; 23(2): 259-67, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21490238

RESUMEN

This paper reviews the shortcomings of present approaches to reduce oral diseases and inequalities, details the importance of social determinants, and links that to research needs and policies on implementation of strategies to reduce oral health inequalities. Inequalities in health are not narrowing. Attention is therefore being directed at determinants of major health conditions and the extent to which those common determinants vary within, between, and among groups, because if inequalities in health vary across groups, then so must underlying causes. Tackling inequalities in health requires strategies tailored to determinants and needs of each group along the social gradient. Approaches focusing mainly on downstream lifestyle and behavioral factors have limited success in reducing health inequalities. They fail to address social determinants, for changing people's behaviors requires changing their environment. There is a dearth of oral health research on social determinants that cause health-compromising behaviors and on risk factors common to some chronic diseases. The gap between what is known and implemented by other health disciplines and the dental fraternity needs addressing. To re-orient oral health research, practice, and policy toward a 'social determinants' model, a closer collaboration between and integration of dental and general health research is needed. Here, we suggest a research agenda that should lead to reductions in global inequalities in oral health.


Asunto(s)
Grupos Focales , Salud Global , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Bucal , Investigación Dental , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Política de Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional
6.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 14(1): 1-16, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21205164

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of the use of digital models to assess tooth size, arch length, irregularity index, arch width and crowding versus measurements generated on hand-held plaster models with digital callipers in patients with and without malocclusion. Studies comparing linear and angular measurements obtained on digital and standard plaster models were identified by searching multiple databases including MEDLINE, LILACS, BBO, ClinicalTrials.gov, the National Research Register and Pro-Quest Dissertation Abstracts and Thesis database, without restrictions relating to publication status or language of publication. Two authors were involved in study selection, quality assessment and the extraction of data. Items from the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic Reviews checklist were used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. No meta-analysis was conducted. Comparisons between measurements of digital and plaster models made directly within studies were reported, and the difference between the (repeated) measurement means for digital and plaster models were considered as estimates. Seventeen relevant studies were included. Where reported, overall, the absolute mean differences between direct and indirect measurements on plaster and digital models were minor and clinically insignificant. Orthodontic measurements with digital models were comparable to those derived from plaster models. The use of digital models as an alternative to conventional measurement on plaster models may be recommended, although the evidence identified in this review is of variable quality.


Asunto(s)
Cefalometría/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Maloclusión/diagnóstico , Modelos Dentales , Humanos , Odontometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
7.
J Dent Res ; 90(5): 573-9, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21248357

RESUMEN

This concise review presents two Cochrane Reviews undertaken to determine: (1) the relative effectiveness of fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations in preventing dental caries in children and adolescents; and (2) the relationship between the use of topical fluorides in young children and their risk of developing dental fluorosis. To determine the relative effectiveness of fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations, we undertook a network meta-analysis utilizing both direct and indirect comparisons from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The review examining fluorosis included evidence from experimental and observational studies. The findings of the reviews confirm the benefits of using fluoride toothpaste, when compared with placebo, in preventing caries in children and adolescents, but only significantly for fluoride concentrations of 1000 ppm and above. The relative caries-preventive effects of fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations increase with higher fluoride concentration. However, there is weak, unreliable evidence that starting the use of fluoride toothpaste in children under 12 months of age may be associated with an increased risk of fluorosis. The decision of what fluoride levels to use for children under 6 years should be balanced between the risk of developing dental caries and that of mild fluorosis.


Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos/administración & dosificación , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/administración & dosificación , Fluorosis Dental/etiología , Pastas de Dientes/química , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Cariostáticos/efectos adversos , Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Índice CPO , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Fluoruros/efectos adversos , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Pastas de Dientes/efectos adversos , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéutico
8.
Caries Res ; 44(6): 579-92, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21150202

RESUMEN

This paper aims to assess systematic reviews on the caries-preventive effect of topical fluorides, identifying key content and reporting quality issues to be considered by researchers planning a review in this area. Published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of any topical fluoride intervention for caries control were included. Relevant databases were searched (December 2009), along with reference lists of included publications. Thirty-eight reports were identified and assessed. A majority of these focused on the child/adolescent population, fluoride toothpastes, no treatment/placebo comparisons, and had caries increment as the main outcome. Complete reporting of eligibility criteria (PICOS) was uncommon, except in Cochrane reviews. Less than half reported searching multiple sources and only one third reported a search strategy. Duplicate study selection and data extraction was reported in 27 (71%) and 16 (42%) reviews, respectively; quality assessment of included studies was not reported in one third of the reviews. Meta-analysis was reported in 20 (52%) reviews, with six not reporting the methods of synthesis used, 17 formally assessing heterogeneity, and 12 reporting analyses for its exploration. This study shows that some content features have been covered more often than others in existing fluoride reviews, while some relevant features are yet to be addressed. Also, reporting of several methodological aspects are below an acceptable level, except for Cochrane reviews. Current reporting guidelines for systematic reviews of interventions (e.g. PRISMA) and sources of high-quality existing reviews (e.g. The Cochrane Library) should be closely followed to enhance the validity and relevance of future topical fluoride reviews.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/prevención & control , Odontología Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Periodismo Odontológico/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 10(3): 183-91, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19772849

RESUMEN

AIM: To present the evidence summarized in the Cochrane fluoride reviews. STUDY DESIGN: An overview of the results of selected systematic reviews. METHODS: Relevant systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) were identified by searching 'The Cochrane Library issue 4, 2008', using the terms 'Fluoride' and 'Caries'. Complete Cochrane reviews assessing the effectiveness of any fluoride-based intervention for preventing caries were selected, and their main features and findings were reviewed. RESULTS: 14 papers were identified of which 11 were relevant full-text reviews. The results were assessed of 7 reviews published from 2002 to 2004 concerning the relative effectiveness of 4 topical fluoride treatments (toothpastes, gels, varnishes and mouthrinses) in preventing caries in children and adolescents. Comparisons in these reviews were made against non-fluoride controls, against each other, and against different combinations. Findings from 4 reviews published between 2004 and 2006, assessing other fluoride modalities (slow release devices, milk), specific comparison/site (fluoride varnishes versus sealants in occlusal surfaces), and particular population and caries outcome (fluorides for white spot lesions in orthodontic patients) were also assessed. The 7 reviews confirm a clear and similar effectiveness of topical fluoride toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels and varnishes for preventing caries, and show that additional caries reduction can be expected when another topical fluoride is combined with fluoride toothpaste. Evidence is insufficient to confirm the effectiveness of slow release fluoride devices and fluoridated milk. The comparative effectiveness of other modes of delivering fluoride, such as to orthodontic patients is also as yet unclear. Fissure sealants appear more effective than fluoride varnish for preventing occlusal caries but the size of the difference is unclear. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of topical fluorides are firmly established based on a sizeable body of evidence from randomized controlled trials. The size of the reductions in caries increment in both the permanent and the primary dentitions emphasizes the importance of including topical fluoride delivered through toothpastes, rinses, gels or varnishes in any caries preventive program. However, trials to discern potential adverse effects are required, and data on acceptability. Better quality research is needed to reach clearer conclusions on the effects of slow release fluoride devices, milk fluoridation, sealants in comparison with fluoride varnishes, and of different modes of delivering fluoride to orthodontic patients.


Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adolescente , Cariostáticos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Fluoruros/administración & dosificación , Fluoruros Tópicos/administración & dosificación , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Braz. j. biol ; 65(4): 675-681, Nov. 2005. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-422576

RESUMEN

Investigamos no presente trabalho o efeito da estimulação de receptor serotonérgico 5-HT1A no comportamento alimentar de codornas (Coturnix japonica). A administração do agonista 5-HT1A, 8-OH-DPAT (0,05 a 5,0 mg/kg), inibiu de modo dose-dependente a ingestão de alimento em codornas normoalimentadas. A inibição mais intensa foi obtida com a dose de 5,0 mg/kg (0,93 ± 0,21 g vs. 5,83 ± 0,25 g, P < 0,05, 2 h após a oferta de alimento). Resposta comparável foi alcançada nas aves previamente submetidas ao jejum alimentar. Ao final de 2 h, a dose maior de 8-OH-DPAT induziu a uma intensa resposta hipofágica (1,59 ± 0,41 g vs. 6,85 ± 1,04 g, P < 0,0001). O tratamento prévio com o antagonista 5-HT1A/b-adrenérgico, propranolol, não bloqueou a ação inibidora do 8-OH-DPAT na ingestão alimentar, ao contrário, intensificou-a (controles, 5,22 ± 1,09 g; 8-OH-DPAT, 1,41 ± 0,19 g; propranolol + 8-OH-DPAT, 0,44 ± 0,25 g, P < 0,01, para todas as comparações). A administração isolada de propranolol evidenciou uma ação hipofágica com a dose maior (controles, 4,5 ± 0,8 g vs. propranolol, 2,0 ± 0,2 g, P < 0,01). Os resultados obtidos evidenciaram um possível papel dos receptores 5-HT1A na modulação do comportamento alimentar em codornas de natureza oposta ao referido para mamíferos. Por outro lado, a potencialização da hipofagia pela prévia administração de propranolol suscita a hipótese de um mecanismo b-adrenérgico excitatório no controle do comportamento alimentar em codornas.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , /farmacología , Coturnix/fisiología , Conducta Alimentaria/efectos de los fármacos , /efectos de los fármacos , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/farmacología , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Propranolol/farmacología , /fisiología , Factores de Tiempo
13.
Braz J Biol ; 65(4): 675-81, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16532192

RESUMEN

In this study, we investigate the effect of serotonin receptor 5-HT1A stimulation on the feeding behavior of quails (Coturnix japonica). The administration of 5-HT1A agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0.05 to 5.0 mg/Kg) dose-dependently inhibited the food intake in normally fed quails. Greater inhibition was attained with 5.0 mg/kg (0.93 +/- 0.21 g vs. 5.83 +/- 0.25 g, P < 0.05, 2 h after food offer). A comparable response was obtained from previously fasted quails. At end of 2 h, a higher dose of 8-OH-DPAT induced more intense hypophagy (1.59 +/- 0.41 g vs. 6.85 +/- 1.04 g, P < 0.0001). Previous treatment with the antagonist 5-HT1A/beta-adrenergic, propranolol, failed to block the inhibitory action of 8-OH-DPAT, but instead, intensified it (controls, 5.22 +/- 1.09 g; 8-OH-DPAT, 1.41 +/- 0.19 g; propranolol + 8-OH-DPAT, 0.44 +/- 0.25 g, P < 0.01, for all comparisons). The administration of an isolated higher dose of propranolol induced a hypophagic action (controls, 4.5 +/- 0.8 g vs. propranolol, 2.0 +/- 0.2 g, P < 0.01). Current outcomes suggest a possible role of 5-HT1A receptor on the feeding behavior of quails, as opposed to mammals. On the other hand, the intensified hypophagy induced by previous administration of propranolol raises the hypothesis of a beta-adrenergic excitatory mechanism that controls the feeding behavior of quails.


Asunto(s)
8-Hidroxi-2-(di-n-propilamino)tetralin/farmacología , Coturnix/fisiología , Conducta Alimentaria/efectos de los fármacos , Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1A/efectos de los fármacos , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/farmacología , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacología , Animales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Masculino , Propranolol/farmacología , Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1A/fisiología , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (1): CD002780, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14973991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Topical fluorides in the form of toothpaste, mouthrinse, varnish and gel are effective caries preventive measures. However, there is uncertainty about the relative value of these interventions. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of one form of topical fluoride intervention with another when used for the prevention of dental caries in children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (May 2000), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2000), plus several other databases. We handsearched journals, reference lists of articles and contacted selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride varnish, gel, mouthrinse, or toothpaste with each other in children up to 16 years during at least 1 year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF) that is the difference in mean caries increments between the 'experimental' and 'control' groups expressed as a percentage of the mean increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. MAIN RESULTS: There were 17 studies included, and 15 contributed data for the meta-analyses. Fluoride toothpaste was not significantly different from mouthrinse (pooled DMFS PF 0%; 95% CI, -18% to 19%; p = 0.94), or gel (pooled DMFS PF 0%; 95% CI, -21% to 21%; p = 1), or both gel and mouthrinse (pooled DMFS PF 1%; 95% CI, -13% to 14%; p = 0.94); heterogeneity was substantial. Results from the single trial comparing toothpaste with varnish (in deciduous teeth) were inconclusive (dfs PF 5%; CI not obtainable). The pooled results from the comparisons of fluoride varnish with mouthrinse was a non-significant difference favouring varnish (DMFS PF 10%; 95% CI, -12% to 32%; p = 0.40), but this result was not robust to sensitivity analysis performed, and heterogeneity was considerable. Results from the single trial comparing varnish with gel (14%, 95% CI, -12% to 40%; p = 0.30) and the single trial comparing gel with mouthrinse (-14% DMFS PF; 95% CI, -40% to 12%; p = 0.30) were inconclusive (favoured varnish and mouthrinse respectively). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Fluoride toothpastes in comparison to mouthrinses or gels appear to have a similar degree of effectiveness for the prevention of dental caries in children. There is no clear suggestion that fluoride varnish is more effective than mouthrinses and the evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fluoride varnishes and gels, and mouthrinses and gels is inconclusive. No conclusions about adverse effects could be reached, because no data were reported on in the trials. Acceptance is likely to be greater for fluoride toothpaste.


Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
15.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (1): CD002781, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14973992

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Topical fluoride therapy (TFT) in the form of toothpastes, mouthrinses, varnishes and gels are effective caries preventive measures. However, there is uncertainty about the relative value of these interventions when used together. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of two TFT modalities combined with one of them alone (mainly toothpaste) when used for the prevention of dental caries in children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (May 2000), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2000), plus several other databases. We handsearched journals, reference lists of articles and contacted selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride varnish, gel, mouthrinse, or toothpaste in combination with each other in children up to 16 years during at least 1 year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF) that is the difference in mean caries increments between the 'treatment' and 'control' groups expressed as a percentage of the mean increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven of the 12 included studies contributed data for the meta-analyses. For the nine trials that provided data for the main meta-analysis on the effect of fluoride mouthrinses, gels or varnishes used in combination with toothpaste (involving 4026 children) the D(M)FS pooled PF was 10% (95% CI, 2% to 17%; p = 0.01) in favour of the combined regimens. Heterogeneity was not substantial in these results (I square = 32%). The separate meta-analyses of fluoride gel or mouthrinse combined with toothpaste versus toothpaste alone favour the combined regimens, but differences were not statistically significant; the significant difference in favour of the combined use of fluoride varnish and toothpaste accrues from a very small trial and appears likely to be a spurious result. Not all other combinations of possible practical value were tested in the included studies. The only other statistically significant result was in favour of the combined use of fluoride gel and mouthrinse in comparison to gel alone (pooled DMFS PF 23%; 95% CI, 4% to 43%; p = 0.02), based on two trials. No other combinations of TFT were consistently superior to a single TFT. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Topical fluorides (mouthrinses, gels, or varnishes) used in addition to fluoride toothpaste achieve a modest reduction in caries compared to toothpaste used alone. No conclusions about any adverse effects could be reached, because data were scarcely reported in the trials.


Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (4): CD002782, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14583954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Topical fluoride therapy (TFT) in the form of varnish, gel, mouthrinse or toothpaste has been used extensively as a caries-preventive intervention for over three decades. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of fluoride varnishes, gels, mouthrinses, and toothpastes in the prevention of dental caries in children and to examine factors potentially modifying their effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (May 2000), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2000), plus several other databases. We handsearched journals, reference lists of articles and contacted selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride varnish, gel, mouthrinse, or toothpaste with placebo or no treatment in children up to 16 years during at least 1 year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF) that is the difference in mean caries increments between the treatment and control groups expressed as a percentage of the mean increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects metaregression analyses. MAIN RESULTS: There were 144 studies included. For the 133 that contributed data for meta-analysis (involving 65,169 children) the D(M)FS pooled prevented fraction estimate was 26% (95% CI, 24% to 29%; p < 0.0001). There was substantial heterogeneity, confirmed statistically (p < 0.0001), but the direction of effect was consistent. The effect of topical fluoride varied according to type of control group used, type of TFT used, mode/setting of TFT use, initial caries levels and intensity of TFT application, but was not influenced by exposure to water fluoridation or other fluoride sources. D(M)FS PF was on average 14% (95% CI, 5% to 23%; p = 0.002) higher in non-placebo controlled trials, 14% (95% CI, 2% to 26%; p = 0.25) higher in fluoride varnish trials compared with all others, and 10% (95% CI, -17% to -3%; p = 0.003) lower in trials of unsupervised home use compared with self applied supervised and operator-applied. There was a 0.7% increase in the PF per unit increase in baseline caries (95% CI, 0.2% to 1.2%; p = 0.004). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of topical fluorides have been firmly established on a sizeable body of evidence from randomized controlled trials. While the formal examination of sources of heterogeneity between studies has been important in the overall conclusions reached, these should be interpreted with caution. We were unable to reach definite conclusions about any adverse effects that might result from the use of topical fluorides, because data reported in the trials are scarce.


Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Geles , Humanos
17.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD002284, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12917928

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluoride mouthrinses have been used extensively as a caries-preventive intervention in school-based programmes and individually at home. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of fluoride mouthrinses in the prevention of dental caries in children and to examine factors potentially modifying their effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (May 2000), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2000), plus several other databases. We handsearched journals, reference lists of articles and contacted selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride mouthrinse with placebo or no treatment in children up to 16 years during at least 1 year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF) that is the difference in mean caries increments between the treatment and control groups expressed as a percentage of the mean increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects metaregression analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. For the 34 that contributed data for meta-analysis (involving 14,600 children) the D(M)FS pooled PF was 26% (95% confidence interval (CI), 23% to 30%; p < 0.0001). Heterogeneity was not substantial, but confirmed statistically (p = 0.008). No significant association between estimates of D(M)FS prevented fractions and baseline caries severity, background exposure to fluorides, rinsing frequency and fluoride concentration was found in metaregression analyses. A funnel plot of the 34 studies indicated no relationship between prevented fraction and study precision. There is little information concerning possible adverse effects or acceptability of treatment in the included trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that the supervised regular use of fluoride mouthrinse at two main strengths and rinsing frequencies is associated with a clear reduction in caries increment in children. In populations with caries increment of 0.25 D(M)FS per year, 16 children will need to use a fluoride mouthrinse (rather than a non-fluoride rinse) to avoid one D(M)FS; in populations with a caries increment of 2.14 D(M)FS per year, 2 children will need to rinse to avoid one D(M)FS. There is a need for complete reporting of side effects and acceptability data in fluoride mouthrinse trials.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/administración & dosificación , Antisépticos Bucales/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
18.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 19(1-2): 122-3, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12721745

RESUMEN

A 3-year-old male was beaten by his stepfather, resulting in a lesion of the third portion of the duodenum that was treated with an occlusive suture of the pyloric mucosa for pyloric exclusion and a gastric-jejunal anastomosis with a double jejunostomy for alimentation with a good result, no serious complications, and relatively a short hospitalization. This procedure may be an alternative for other similar cases.


Asunto(s)
Duodeno/lesiones , Duodeno/cirugía , Yeyunostomía/métodos , Píloro/cirugía , Abdomen Agudo/cirugía , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Sutura
19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (1): CD002278, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12535435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluoride toothpastes have been widely used for over three decades and remain a benchmark intervention for the prevention of dental caries. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of fluoride toothpastes in the prevention of caries in children and to examine factors potentially modifying their effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (May 2000), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2000), plus several other databases. We handsearched journals, reference lists of articles and contacted selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride toothpaste with placebo in children up to 16 years during at least one year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF) that is the difference in caries increments between the treatment and control groups expressed as a percentage of the increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects meta-regression analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-four studies were included. For the 70 that contributed data for meta-analysis (involving 42,300 children) the D(M)FS pooled PF was 24% (95% confidence interval (CI), 21 to 28%; p<0.0001). This means that 1.6 children need to brush with a fluoride toothpaste (rather than a non-fluoride toothpaste) over three years to prevent one D(M)FS in populations with caries increment of 2.6 D(M)FS per year. In populations with caries increment of 1.1 D(M)FS per year, 3.7 children will need to use a fluoride toothpaste for three years to avoid one D(M)FS. There was clear heterogeneity, confirmed statistically (p<0.0001). The effect of fluoride toothpaste increased with higher baseline levels of D(M)FS, higher fluoride concentration, higher frequency of use, and supervised brushing, but was not influenced by exposure to water fluoridation. There is little information concerning the deciduous dentition or adverse effects (fluorosis). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Supported by more than half a century of research, the benefits of fluoride toothpastes are firmly established. Taken together, the trials are of relatively high quality, and provide clear evidence that fluoride toothpastes are efficacious in preventing caries.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
20.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD002279, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12137653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Topically applied fluoride varnishes have been used extensively as an operator-applied caries-preventive intervention for over two decades. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of fluoride varnishes in the prevention of dental caries in children and to examine factors potentially modifying their effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: Multiple electronic database searches, reference lists of articles, journal handsearch, selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride varnish with placebo or no treatment in children up to 16 years during at least one year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Study authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF), that is the difference in caries increments between the treatment and control groups expressed as a percentage of the increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects meta-regression analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Nine studies were included, involving 2709 children. For the seven that contributed data for the main meta-analysis, the D(M)FS pooled prevented fraction estimate was 46% (95% CI, 30% to 63%; p<0.0001). There was substantial heterogeneity, confirmed statistically (p<0.0001). The pooled d(e/m)fs prevented fraction estimate was 33% (95% CI, 19% to 48%; p<0.0001). No significant association between estimates of D(M)FS prevented fractions and baseline caries severity or background exposure to fluorides was found in meta-regression, and a funnel plot of the seven studies indicated no relationship between prevented fraction and study precision. In both methods, power is limited when only a few trials are included. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The review suggests a substantial caries-inhibiting effect of fluoride varnish in both the permanent and the deciduous dentitions based largely on trials with no treatment controls. There is little information concerning acceptability of treatment or possible side effects in the included trials. Given the relatively poor quality of most of the included studies and the wide confidence intervals around the estimates of effect, there remains a need for further trials. It is important that these trials should be of high quality and include assessment of potential adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros Tópicos/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Niño , Fluoruros Tópicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA