RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is very widely used for the management of tendinopathies and plantar fasciitis. AIM: The aim of the study is to determine whether there are prognostic factors that may influence the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for these diseases. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-five patients were analyzed 2 months after shock wave treatment for rotator cuff tendinitis, epicondylitis, Achilles tendinopathy, trocanteritis, jumper's knee or plantar fasciitis. We recorded the epidemiological, clinical and treatment protocol, and these data were correlated with treatment outcome. RESULTS: Clinical improvement was achieved in 45.9 % of these patients. We discovered that laterality different to the dominant limb (p < 0.0001) and repeated shock wave treatments (p = 0.004) are prognostic factors in an unsuccessful therapy, while being male (p = 0.015) and a high body mass index (p = 0.004) are factors for success. We found no differences in relation to age, diet, blood type, work or sport activity, presence of co-morbidities, drugs, type of tendinopathy, density of energy delivered and other physiotherapy treatment. Knowledge of these prognostic factors may lead to improved insight for physicians and physiotherapists to predict the extent of the recovery and adjust rehabilitation and patient expectations accordingly.
Asunto(s)
Ondas de Choque de Alta Energía/uso terapéutico , Tendinopatía/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) immunohistochemical expression was analyzed in 75 human bladder tumor specimens, where the expression of some angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PDECGF), and tumor progression markers, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), p16, mutated p53, and normal pRB, were also analyzed. The results were then compared to the clinical and pathological characteristics of the disease. PPAR gamma was expressed more significantly in papillary tumors than in solid cancers, and its presence was associated with statistical significance to low incidence of tumor recurrence or progression. This significant association was observed also when PPAR gamma was expressed in the presence of PDECGF, which resulted, when considered alone, to an angiogenic factor typical of solid cancers and appeared related to poor prognosis. In the presence of bFGF, on the contrary, PPAR gamma expression no longer resulted to a significant association with low incidence of tumor recurrence or progression, suggesting a possible worsening role of this angiogenic factor, typical of papillary cancers, in its interaction with PPAR gamma.