RESUMEN
Introduction: Although a major goal of preoperative evaluation is to identify risk factors and improve postoperative outcomes, current clinical guidelines in Mexico indicate that preoperative spirometry should only be performed on patients with pulmonary disease. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative complications (POC), mortality, and risk factors among adults who did or did not undergo preoperative spirometry, based on their Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) risk level. Material and methods: An observational, retrospective and comparative study design was used to identify 2059 patients from the General Hospital of Mexico who had an ARISCAT assessment during 2013-2017. Patients were classified in two groups: ARISCAT with spirometry (n = 1306) and ARISCAT without spirometry (n = 753). Chi-square, Fisher's exact test and the Student's t-tests were used to compare groups. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with an increased risk of POC and mortality. Results: In the ARISCAT with spirometry group, 11% of patients had POC, compared with 48% of patients in the ARISCAT without spirometry group. High-risk ARISCAT patients who did not receive spirometry had higher mortality (18%), than those who underwent spirometry (0.4%). Logistic regression results indicate that not performing preoperative spirometry increases the probability of POC and mortality. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the combined use of preoperative spirometry and ARISCAT is associated with reduced POC and mortality. Future clinical guidelines should recommend the use of preoperative spirometry for patients with a moderate or high ARISCAT level in Mexico.
Introducción: La evaluación preoperatoria se centra en identificar los factores de riesgo y mejorar los resultados posoperatorios; las guías clínicas actuales en México indican la espirometría preoperatoria solo en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar. El objetivo fue comparar la incidencia de complicaciones posoperatorias (CPO), la mortalidad y los factores de riesgo en pacientes clasificados por su nivel de riesgo de la escala de riesgo respiratorio en pacientes quirúrgicos de Cataluña (ARISCAT) sometidos o no a una espirometría preoperatoria. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y comparativo. Se clasificaron 2.059 pacientes del Hospital General de México durante 2013 a 2017; en dos grupos: ARISCAT con espirometría (n = 1.306) y ARISCAT sin espirometría (n = 753). Se aplicaron pruebas de X2, f de Fisher y t de Student para comparar los grupos y análisis de regresión logística para identificar los factores asociados a mayor riesgo de CPO y mortalidad. Resultados: Las CPO en el grupo ARISCAT con espirometría se presentaron en 11% de los pacientes, en comparación con el grupo ARISCAT sin espirometría (48%). Los pacientes ARISCAT sin espirometría de alto riesgo tuvieron una mortalidad más elevada (18%), en comparación con los pacientes que sí la realizaron (0.4%). Los resultados de la regresión logística indican que no realizar la espirometría preoperatoria incrementa la probabilidad de CPO y mortalidad. Conclusiones: Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que el uso combinado de espirometría preoperatoria y ARISCAT se asocia con menores CPO y mortalidad. Las guías clínicas futuras deberán recomendar el uso de la espirometría preoperatoria para pacientes con un nivel moderado o alto de ARISCAT en México.
RESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Comparar el control glucémico entre pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 prepandemia vs pandemia de Covid-19 que acudieron a unidades de salud de primer nivel de atención de la Ciudad de México. Material y métodos. Se analizaron los registros de 23 912 pacientes con diabetes; 78.7% fueron del grupo prepandemia (2016 a 2020) y 21.3% del grupo pandemia (marzo 2020 a julio 2021). Se calcularon medidas de tendencia central y de dispersión, pruebas t de Student y se ajustó un modelo de regresión logística múltiple. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los pacientes con diabetes fueron mujeres (66.6 y 62.6%) con edad promedio de 59 y 58 años, respectivamente, y con hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1) final de 7.7 vs el grupo pandemia (8.0). Las variables asociadas con el descontrol glucémico incluyeron periodo, nivel de HbA1, sobrepeso, obesidad, antecedente de padres con diabetes, número de medicamentos y tipo de insulina. CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de los pacientes con diabetes en ambos grupos tuvieron descontrol glucémico. Los pacientes del grupo pandemia tuvieron mayor descontrol glucémico de HbA1 comparados con los del grupo prepandemia. Después de recibir atención médica en ambos grupos, los pacientes mejoraron su control glucémico.
RESUMEN
AIM: Combining preoperative spirometry with the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalunia (ARISCAT) risk scale can reduce post-operative complications and improve patient survival. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of performing spirometry or not in conjunction with the ARISCAT scale, to reduce post-operative complications and improve survival among adult patients undergoing elective surgery in Mexico. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare the specific cost and health outcomes associated with the combined use of the ARISCAT scale and preoperative spirometry (Group 1), and the use of the ARISCAT scale without preoperative spirometry (Group 2). The health outcomes evaluated were post-operative complications and survival. The perspective was from the health care provider (Hospital General de México) and direct medical costs were reported in 2019 US dollars. A decision tree with a time horizon of eight months was used for each health outcome and ARISCAT risk level. RESULTS: The combined use of the ARISCAT scale and spirometry is more cost-effective for reducing post-operative complications in the low and moderate-risk levels and is cost-saving in the high-risk level, than use of the ARISCAT scale without spirometry. To improve patient survival, ARISCAT and spirometry are also more cost-effective at the moderate risk level, and cost-saving for high-risk patients, than using the ARISCAT scale alone. CONCLUSIONS: The use of preoperative spirometry among patients with a high ARISCAT risk level was cost-saving, reduced post-operative complications, and improved survival. Our findings indicate an urgent need to implement spirometry as part of preoperative care in Mexico, which is already the standard of care in other countries.