Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
World Neurosurg ; 132: 197-201, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31450001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds are the most common etiology of penetrating spine injuries and have been increasing in incidence in civilian populations. Although these injuries typically result in severe neurologic deficits, operative intervention remains is controversial and is usually reserved for patients with neurologic deterioration, a persistent externalized cerebrospinal fluid fistula, mechanical instability, metallic toxicity, or a bullet location at high risk of migration. CASE DESCRIPTION: A previously asymptomatic patient who had sustained a gunshot wound to the cervical spine 20 years previously presented with new-onset progressive myelopathy and radiculopathy secondary to heterotopic ossification (HO) surrounding the retained bullet fragments near the left lateral masses of C5-T1. Computed tomography myelography demonstrated no cranial migration of contrast material past this region of the spine, suggesting severe spinal canal stenosis. Intraoperatively, bullet shrapnel and heterotopic bone fragments were found within the central canal causing compression of the spinal cord. Following decompression and stabilization, the patient had complete resolution of his symptoms and returned to his neurologic baseline. Although HO has been reported as a complication following through and through gunshot wounds, there is a paucity of literature discussing HO formation around retained bullet fragments in the spine. CONCLUSIONS: HO surrounding retained bullet fragments in the spine is a rare cause of progressive neurologic deterioration following gunshot wounds. Surgical excision of the shrapnel and heterotopic bone can lead to symptomatic relief, and therefore surgery should be considered as a treatment option in carefully selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Osificación Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagen , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adulto , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laminectomía , Masculino , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Radiculopatía/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Neurosurg Focus ; 46(4): E4, 2019 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30933921

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVELumbar fusion is typically associated with high degrees of pain and immobility. The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach has been successful in speeding the recovery after other surgical procedures. In this paper, the authors examined the results of early implementation of ERAS for lumbar fusion.METHODSBeginning in March 2018 at the authors' institution, all patients undergoing posterior, 1- to 3-level lumbar fusion surgery by any of 3 spine surgeons received an intraoperative injection of liposomal bupivacaine, immediate single postoperative infusion of 1-g intravenous acetaminophen, and daily postoperative visits from the authors' multidisciplinary ERAS care team. Non-English- or non-Spanish-speaking patients and those undergoing nonelective or staged procedures were excluded. Reviews of medical records were conducted for the ERAS cohort of 57 patients and a comparison group of 40 patients who underwent the same procedures during the 6 months before implementation.RESULTSGroups did not differ significantly with regard to sex, age, or BMI (all p > 0.05). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS cohort than in the control cohort (2.9 days vs 3.8 days; p = 0.01). Patients in the ERAS group consumed significantly less oxycodone-acetaminophen than the controls on postoperative day (POD) 0 (408.0 mg vs 1094.7 mg; p = 0.0004), POD 1 (1320.0 mg vs 1708.4 mg; p = 0.04), and POD 3 (1500.1 mg vs 2105.4 mg; p = 0.03). Postoperative pain scores recorded by the physical therapy and occupational therapy teams and nursing staff each day were lower in the ERAS cohort than in controls, with POD 1 achieving significance (4.2 vs 6.0; p = 0.006). The total amount of meperidine (8.8 mg vs 44.7 mg; p = 0.003) consumed was also significantly decreased in the ERAS group, as was ondansetron (2.8 mg vs 6.0 mg; p = 0.02). Distance ambulated on each POD was farther in the ERAS cohort, with ambulation on POD 1 (109.4 ft vs 41.4 ft; p = 0.002) achieving significance.CONCLUSIONSIn this very initial implementation of the first phase of an ERAS program for short-segment lumbar fusion, the authors were able to demonstrate substantial positive effects on the early recovery process. Importantly, these effects were not surgeon-specific and could be generalized across surgeons with disparate technical predilections. The authors plan additional iterations to their ERAS protocols for continued quality improvements.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Tiempo de Internación , Región Lumbosacra , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Ocupacional , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Clin Neurosci ; 59: 209-212, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30528358

RESUMEN

Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a rare etiology of extra-spinal sciatica in which pathologies associated with or around the piriformis muscle (PM) irritate the adjacent sciatic nerve (SN), however, there is scarcity in the literature regarding its exact etiologies, thus, we performed a retrospective study to elucidate the epidemiology of PS and assess various causes of the syndrome. Our study included patients assessed at our institution who presented with sciatica of non-spinal origin between May 2014 and December 2015. Radiology reports of all patients who received pelvic MRI were examined for positive findings involving PM and SN. Of the 143 patients recognized with sciatica and negative lumbar pathology, 24 patients (17%) exhibited positive PM and SN findings. Average patient age was 50.0 ±â€¯15.1 years (range: 21-75), and 17 were female. Seven patients (5%; 4M/3F) presented with tumor, seven patients (5%) had chronic inflammatory changes, one patient had SN adhesions to obturator muscle, three patients (2%, 3F) had aberrant anatomy, and the remaining patients had positive MRI findings, such as nerve atrophy or PM hypertrophy without identifiable cause. Seven patients received steroid injections in the peri-sciatic fossa, and four displayed poor response. Our findings suggested possible trends in extra-spinal sciatica. Affected males appeared more likely to present with tumor, while affected females were more likely to present younger, but with aberrant anatomy. Steroid injections appeared to be suboptimal in most cases. Pelvic MRI is helpful in patients with sciatica and negative spine imaging to rule out neoplastic involvement.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Músculo Piriforme/epidemiología , Síndrome del Músculo Piriforme/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome del Músculo Piriforme/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nervio Ciático/efectos de los fármacos , Nervio Ciático/patología , Ciática/complicaciones
5.
Neurosurg Rev ; 39(2): 175-83; discussion 183, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26219855

RESUMEN

Advances in imaging technology and microsurgical techniques have made microsurgical resection the treatment of choice in cases of symptomatic intramedullary tumors. The use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for spinal tumors is a recent development, and its application to intramedullary lesions is debated. We conducted a literature search through PubMed's MeSH system, compiling information regarding intramedullary neoplasms treated by SRS. We compiled histology, tumor location and size, treatment modality, radiation dose, fractionation, radiation-induced complications, follow-up, and survival. Ten papers reporting on 52 patients with 70 tumors were identified. Metastatic lesions accounted for 33%, while 67% were primary ones. Tumor location was predominantly cervical (53%), followed by thoracic (33%). Mean volume was 0.55 cm(3) (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26-0.83). Preferred treatment modality was CyberKnife® (87%), followed by Novalis® (7%) and linear particle accelerator (LINAC) (6%). Mean radiation dose was 22.14 Gy (95% CI, 20.75-23.53), with mean fractionation of 4 (95% CI, 3-5). Three hemangioblastomas showed cyst enlargement. Symptom improvement or stabilization was seen in all but two cases. Radionecrotic spots adjacent to treated areas were seen at autopsy in four lesions, without clinical manifestations. Overall, clinical and radiological outcomes were favorable. Although surgery remains the treatment of choice for symptomatic intramedullary lesions, SRS can be a safe and effective option in selected cases. While this review suggests the overall safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of intramedullary tumors, future studies need randomized, homogeneous patient populations followed over a longer period to provide more robust evidence in its favor.


Asunto(s)
Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Médula Espinal/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Humanos , Aceleradores de Partículas , Radiocirugia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Clin Neurosci ; 22(12): 1877-82, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26601809

RESUMEN

Since virtually no trials have evaluated the effectiveness of temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of spinal cord (SC) glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), we conducted a systematic review to evaluate its efficacy. Primary SC GBM is rare. Its management remains unclear, even though treatment guidelines have been established since 2005 for its cranial counterpart. We performed a medical subject heading search with the terms "glioblastoma" and "primary spinal cord neoplasms, intramedullary". We stratified the papers into two groups according to the use of TMZ, and analyzed survival rates using the Kaplan­Meier method with a two-sided log-rank scale. The TMZ subgroup contained nine articles and a total of 19 patients with primary SC GBM who were treated with adjuvant TMZ. The non-TMZ group consisted of 19 articles including 45 patients who underwent other treatment modalities. The TMZ subgroup had an overall survival of 16 months, compared to the non-TMZ group with a median overall survival of 10 months. The difference between these two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.57). While this review did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in long term survival between patients with SC GBM treated with TMZ versus those not treated with TMZ, a slightly longer survival time was seen in the TMZ group. The small number of patients is likely a contributing factor to the lack of statistical significance. Our analysis highlights the need for a multi-institutional, prospective, controlled study to evaluate the use of TMZ in the treatment of SC GBM.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Temozolomida , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Neurosurgery ; 70(2): 264-77, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22251974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to the best posterior operative procedure to treat multilevel compressive cervical spondylotic myelopathy. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical, radiological, and patient satisfaction outcomes between expansile cervical laminoplasty (ECL) and cervical laminectomy and fusion (CLF). METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of ECL vs CLF in patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy. End points included the Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Nurick score, and radiographic measures. RESULTS: A survey of academic North American spine surgeons (n = 30) demonstrated that CLF is the most commonly used (70%) posterior procedure to treat multilevel spondylotic cervical myelopathy. A total of 16 patients were randomized: 7 to CLF and 9 to ECL. Both groups showed improvements in their Nurick grade and Japanese Orthopedic Association score postoperatively, but only the improvement in the Nurick grade for the ECL group was statistically significant (P < .05). The cervical range of motion between C2 and C7 was reduced by 75% in the CLF group and by only 20% in the ECL group in a comparison of preoperative and postoperative range of motion. The overall increase in canal area was significantly (P < .001) greater in the CLF group, but there was a suggestion that the adjacent level was more narrowed in the CLF group in as little as 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In many respects, ECL compares favorably to CLF. Although the patient numbers were small, there were significant improvements in pain measures in the ECL group while still maintaining range of motion. Restoration of spinal canal area was superior in the CLF group.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Laminectomía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Espondilosis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular
8.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 6(2): 178-83, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17330589

RESUMEN

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare malignant smooth-muscle tumor that rarely metastasizes to bone. It is extremely uncommon for osseous metastasis to be the initial presentation of leiomyosarcoma or to be the initial manifestation of recurrence in patients with a history of leiomyosarcoma. The authors have treated four cases of metastatic leiomyosarcoma with the lesion initially presenting in the spine, and a fifth case of disseminated leiomyosarcoma that involved the spine. In their report, they highlight the cases of two of these patients and provide tabular data for the remaining three. The authors performed a comprehensive review of the literature on spinal leiomyosarcomas and retrospective chart reviews of five surgically treated patients in whom a spinal metastatic leiomyosarcoma was diagnosed. Their series consists of five women who ranged in age from 36 to 47 years (mean age 43.2 years). Four patients had known, or presumed, uterine primary lesions, whereas one harbored a retroperitoneal primary tumor. These lesions generally appear as lytic foci on imaging studies, but variable imaging characteristics were observed. All cases were managed aggressively: four patients underwent posterior/posterolateral decompression and fusion, and one underwent anterior-posterior en bloc resection and fusion. In all cases preoperative symptoms resolved. Two patients died 9 and 13 years after initial presentation. The remaining patients are alive and neurologically intact. Metastatic spinal leiomyosarcomas tend to symptomatically involve only one spinal level at the time of diagnosis and are known to recur locally. These lesions commonly affect women in early middle age, and long-term survival, even in those with systemic metastatic lesions, is better than that seen in individuals with more aggressive spinal metastases. Attempted gross-total resection with fusion, as opposed to minimal palliative decompression, is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Leiomiosarcoma/secundario , Leiomiosarcoma/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Leiomiosarcoma/diagnóstico , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/patología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA