RESUMEN
Das doenças sistêmicas com alterações oculares, destacam-se a retinopatia diabética e a oftalmopatia de Graves que têm em comum vários aspectos: são alterações endócrinas e metabólicas, auto-imunes e o acometimento ocular pode ser grave, levando à perda da função visual. A orientação correta do médico generalista pode modificar o prognóstico visual dos portadores destas doenças, pois dá oportunidade para que o oftalmologista intervenha no momento adequado.No diabetes a principal alteração ocular ocorre na retina, com o desenvolvimento da retinopatia diabética que se manifesta em 30% dos casos.Na oftalmopatia de Graves é importante o esclarecimento de que nem sempre as alterações oculares estão relacionadas a alterações hormonais que possam sinalizar a atividade da doença. A doença ocular pode ocorrer no hipertireoidismo, bem como no hipotireoidismo; em pacientes sem alterações hormonais afeta principalmente os tecidos adiposo e muscular da órbita e do olho. Descreve-se neste artigo o tratamento atual da retinopatia diabética e da oftalmopatia de Graves para que os pacientes possam ser orientados e esclarecidos sobre as condutas a serem adotadas pelo oftalmologista.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of pentoxifylline (PTX) in subjects with inactive Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) through a specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire and exophthalmometry readings. METHODS: Eighteen females were randomly divided in two groups. Group A (n=9) was treated with PTX 1200 mg orally/day for 6 months. Group B (n=9) received placebo during the initial 6 months and then PTX for another 6 months. Proptosis measurements were carried out every 3 months and a questionnaire graded from 0 to 10 according to the severity of the symptoms was performed at baseline and after placebo and PTX administration. RESULTS: At baseline, Group A questionnaire score values were 5.5 (median; range 3.5 to 8.0), and 5.0 after 6 months (3.0 to 6.0; p=0.01). In Group B, baseline values were not significantly different after 6 months of placebo: 6.0 (4.5 to 7.0) and 5.5 (4.5 to 7.0), respectively. However, a significant change was observed 6 months after PTX: 4.0 (2.0 to 5.0; p<0.001). Patients in Group A had a progressive improvement of proptosis during PTX: at baseline, 23 mm (median; range 20 to 32); after 3 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.02); and after 6 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.005). In Group B, proptosis remained stable during placebo: at baseline, 23 mm (21 to 25); after 3 months, 23 mm (20 to 25); and after 6 months, 23.5 mm (20 to 25). A significant change was observed after 3 and 6 months of PTX: 22 mm (19 to 24; p=0.0006) and 20.8 mm (17 to 25; p=0.0003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline seems to improve the QOL of patients in the inactive phase of GO. The objective findings of the proptosis readings corroborate to suggest that PTX may be an effective and promising drug in the inactive phase of GO.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Pentoxifilina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Terapias Complementarias , Exoftalmia/fisiopatología , Femenino , Enfermedad de Graves/fisiopatología , Humanos , Oftalmodinamometría , Pentoxifilina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/efectos adversos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of pentoxifylline (PTX) in subjects with inactive Graves ophthalmopathy (GO) through a specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire and exophthalmometry readings. METHODS: Eighteen females were randomly divided in two groups. Group A (n=9) was treated with PTX 1200 mg orally/day for 6 months. Group B (n=9) received placebo during the initial 6 months and then PTX for another 6 months. Proptosis measurements were carried out every 3 months and a questionnaire graded from 0 to 10 according to the severity of the symptoms was performed at baseline and after placebo and PTX administration. RESULTS: At baseline, Group A questionnaire score values were 5.5 (median; range 3.5 to 8.0), and 5.0 after 6 months (3.0 to 6.0; p=0.01). In Group B, baseline values were not significantly different after 6 months of placebo: 6.0 (4.5 to 7.0) and 5.5 (4.5 to 7.0), respectively. However, a significant change was observed 6 months after PTX: 4.0 (2.0 to 5.0; p<0.001). Patients in Group A had a progressive improvement of proptosis during PTX: at baseline, 23 mm (median; range 20 to 32); after 3 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.02); and after 6 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.005). In Group B, proptosis remained stable during placebo: at baseline, 23 mm (21 to 25); after 3 months, 23 mm (20 to 25); and after 6 months, 23.5 mm (20 to 25). A significant change was observed after 3 and 6 months of PTX: 22 mm (19 to 24; p=0.0006) and 20.8 mm (17 to 25; p=0.0003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline seems to improve the QOL of patients in the inactive phase of GO. The objective findings of the proptosis readings corroborate to suggest that PTX may be an effective and promising drug in the inactive phase of GO. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2004; 14: 277-83).
RESUMEN
The effects of radioiodine (131I) therapy for hyperthyroidism on the ocular process of Graves' disease is controversial. In order to evaluate the outcome of ophthalmopathy after radioiodine therapy for thyrotoxicosis we studied prospectively 30 Graves' hyperthyroid patients, 22 submitted to radioiodine (131I) treatment (group A) and 8 treated with antithyroid drugs (group B). All patients were evaluated by clinical ophthalmologic examination, and ocular proptosis (OP) was measured with both a Hertel exophthalmometer (HE) and computed tomography (CT) before and 4 to 7 months after therapy. No statistical difference was obtained between pre- and post-treatment OP measurements in each eye in either group, and we did not observe worsening in the ophthalmopathy of patients treated with drugs or radioiodine. After therapy, there was an improvement in the clinical signs of ophthalmopathy in 59% of group A and in 37.5% of group B patients. We found a significant correlation between OP measured by HE and by CT. CT findings showed an increase in orbital fat and/or muscle thickening in all patients at baseline, proving to be a useful procedure for ophthalmologic diagnosis in doubtful cases. No patient in either group developed hypothyroidism or elevated TSH levels during the study period; this may explain our good results in the evolution of Graves' ophthalmopathy after treatment with 131I and antithyroid drugs. Euthyroidism seems to be an important factor in the outcome of ophthalmopathy after therapy, whatever the mode of treatment chosen to achieve it.