Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 55(11): 5384-7, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21859943

RESUMEN

Drug resistance surveillance identified six untreated leprosy patients in the Philippines with Mycobacterium leprae folP1 mutations which confer dapsone resistance. Five patients share a village of residence; four who carried the mutation, Thr53Val, were also linked by M. leprae variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) strain types. In India, folP1 mutations were detected in two relapse patients with a history of dapsone treatment. Mutations were not found in the rifampin target gene rpoB. These findings indicate that dapsone resistance is being transmitted.


Asunto(s)
Dapsona/uso terapéutico , Leprostáticos/uso terapéutico , Lepra/tratamiento farmacológico , Lepra/transmisión , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Mycobacterium leprae/efectos de los fármacos , Mycobacterium leprae/patogenicidad , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Humanos , India , Lepra/genética , Mutación , Mycobacterium leprae/genética , Filipinas , Rifampin/uso terapéutico
2.
Lepr Rev ; 81(2): 111-20, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825115

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To quantify the impact of the diagnosis of leprosy and of visible impairments in people affected by leprosy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three interview-based questionnaires designed to measure activity limitation, participation restriction, and general self-efficacy were used to collect data from three Groups. Group 1: leprosy affected people with visible impairment, Group 2: newly diagnosed leprosy patients with no visible impairment, Group 3: patients with other skin diseases symptomatic for more than 1 month. RESULTS: One hundred and eight subjects were recruited. The subjects with visible impairments (Group 1) had higher levels of participation restriction than those with skin disease (P0.012), and participation restriction was similar between subjects in Groups 2 and 3 (P0-305). The people in Group 1 (35 subjects) also reported significantly more activity limitation compared to the people in either Group 2 (35 subjects) or Group 3 (38 subjects) (P 0-001, respectively). The subjects in Group 2 had no significant activity limitation compared with those in Group 3 (P0.338). A multivariate analysis showed that severe visible impairment was a risk factor for activity limitation (odds ratio 5.68, 95% CI: 1.09-297, P0.039) and a low level of self-efficacy (Odds ratio 6.38, 95% CI: 1.06-38.3, P0-043) among people affected by leprosy. CONCLUSION: Visible impairments affected the activities and attitudes of people affected by leprosy. However, others without visible impairment, had activity limitations, participation restrictions and levels of general self-efficacy that were similar to patients with other skin diseases. Prevention of visible impairments should be considered a key intervention for stigma reduction.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Lepra/diagnóstico , Lepra/psicología , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Lepra/epidemiología , Masculino , Filipinas/epidemiología , Psicometría , Factores de Riesgo , Autoeficacia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Aislamiento Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA