Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Med ; 19(7): 559-564, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scientific writing is a core component of academic hospital medicine, and yet finding time to engage in deeply focused writing is difficult in part due to the highly clinical, 24/7 nature of the specialty that can limit opportunities for writing-focused collaboration and mentorship. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and evaluate an academic writing retreat program. METHODS: We drafted a set of key retreat features to guide implementation of a 3-day, 2-night retreat program held within a 2 h radius of our hospital. Agendas included writing blocks ranging from 45 to 90 min interspersed with breaks and opportunities for feedback, exercise, and preparing meals together. After each retreat, we distributed an evaluation with multiple choice and free text response options to characterize retreat helpfulness and later gathered data on the status of each paper and grant worked on. RESULTS: We held 4 retreats between September 2022 and October 2023, engaging 18 faculty and fellows at a cost of $296 per attendee per retreat. In evaluations, nearly 80% reported that the retreat was extremely helpful, and comments praised the highly mentored environment, enriching community of colleagues, and release from commitments that get in the way of writing. Of the 24 papers attendees worked on, 12 have been accepted and 6 are under review. Of the 4 grant proposals, 2 are under review. CONCLUSIONS: We implemented a low-cost, productive writing retreat program that attendees reported was helpful in supporting deep work and represented a meaningful step toward building a community centered around academic writing.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Hospitalar , Escritura , Humanos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Eficiencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mentores , Desarrollo de Programa , Docentes Médicos
2.
J Med Educ Curric Dev ; 11: 23821205241229774, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38327827

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Best practices for content selection, mode of delivery, and timing of pediatric clerkship readiness curricula for medical students have, by and large, not been established. Capitalizing on changes in structure of the clinical clerkships during the COVID-19 pandemic, we created an upfront clerkship readiness curriculum, termed Pediatric Intersession (PI), to replace the existing weekly lecture-based clerkship didactics. METHODS: Our goal was to develop an interactive curriculum with innovative instructional design methodology intended to promote broad foundational pediatric knowledge and clerkship preparedness using case-based learning. We first conducted a needs assessment and crafted curriculum content using guiding principles from the 2019 Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (COMSEP) curriculum. We then organized material into four daily modules prior to the start of the clerkship and employed flipped classroom (FC) methodology. RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of students completed course evaluations, and >90% of the 100 respondents reported that the PI enhanced their clinical learning. Pre-/post-testing demonstrated some knowledge gain following the small-group sessions and there was no change on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Exam mean scores compared to prior cohorts of students. CONCLUSIONS: The global pandemic provided an opportunity to re-envision our pediatric clerkship didactics content, while also incorporating instructional design methodology preferred by students. Our curriculum promotes a small group-based, interactive approach to clerkship readiness that fosters learning in the clinical environment that can be adapted for various settings. Our evaluation suggests that the transition to a FC readiness curriculum can be done successfully while effectively preparing students for their pediatric clerkship.

3.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(11): 967-975, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37842730

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic disrupted the practice of family-centered rounds. After the height of the pandemic, a trainee-led team identified a low percentage of bedside rounds on general pediatrics resident teams and combined a quality improvement framework and change management theory to increase bedside rounds. Initial efforts focused on a single general pediatrics team with the aim to increase bedside rounds from 18% to 50% within 6 months and sustain improvement for 12 months. A second aim was to increase bedside rounds from 7% to 50% for all general pediatrics resident teams within 6 months of spread. METHODS: The Model for Improvement informed the identification of 3 primary drivers of bedside rounds: knowledge, culture, and logistics. Twelve plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were implemented. Measures included the percentage of bedside rounds (primary outcome), caregiver attendance (secondary outcome), and nurse attendance and rounding time (balancing measures). RESULTS: For the initial team, 13 522 patient days were analyzed for the primary outcome with the average percentage of weekly bedside rounds increasing from 18% to 89% with 12 months of sustained improvement. The spread of the intervention to all teams revealed an increase in bedside rounding from 7% to 54%. The most significant improvements occurred after PDSA cycle 2, a communication bundle, and PDSA cycle 5, when the project was spread to all teams. CONCLUSIONS: This trainee-led initiative reveals the strength of the incorporation of change management theory within a quality improvement framework, resulting in rapid and sustainable increase in bedside rounds.


Asunto(s)
Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Rondas de Enseñanza , Humanos , Niño , Gestión del Cambio , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos
4.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(6): 471-479, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37125497

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Individuals who prefer to communicate about health care in a language other than English (LOE) experience poorer quality medical care and challenges when communicating with health care providers. The objective of this study was to elucidate how caregivers who prefer an LOE perceive communication with their physicians on an inpatient general pediatrics service. METHODS: Caregivers of patients admitted to the general pediatrics service at our urban freestanding children's hospital whose preferred language for medical care was Spanish, Arabic, Brazilian Portuguese, or Mandarin were eligible for this qualitative study. Semistructured interviews using video interpreter services were conducted to explore the participants' experiences communicating with their physicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 participants representing 7 countries of origin and 4 non-English languages: Spanish, Arabic, Brazilian Portuguese, and Mandarin. Three main domains emerged, including: (1) use of interpreter services, (2) overall communication experience with physician providers, and (3) suggestions for improvement in physician communication. Salient themes included early identification of the need for an interpreter is essential and physicians' use of body language in combination with an interpreter enhances successful communication. CONCLUSIONS: This project fills a gap in existing literature by describing the perspectives of caregivers who prefer an LOE, including those speaking languages other than Spanish, as they communicate with inpatient pediatricians. In addition to ensuring appropriate use of interpreter services, physicians can focus on using plain language and gestures during encounters, helping to facilitate communication and provide culturally competent care for this population.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Barreras de Comunicación , Pacientes Internos , Lenguaje , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Humanos , Comunicación , Satisfacción del Paciente
5.
6.
J Child Neurol ; 35(7): 472-479, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202201

RESUMEN

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression are seen in parents and children following critical illness. Whether this exists in parents and children following pediatric stroke has not been thoroughly studied. We examined emotional outcomes in 54 mothers, 27 fathers, and 17 children with stroke. Parents of children 0-18 years and children 7-18 years who were within 2 years of stroke occurrence were asked to complete questionnaires to determine their emotional outcomes. Of participating mothers, 28% reported PTSD, 26% depression, and 4% anxiety; in fathers, 15% reported PTSD, 24% depression, and none reported anxiety. Further, children reported significant emotional difficulty, with 24% having depression, 14% anxiety, and 6% PTSD by self-report ratings. Maternal PTSD, anxiety and depression, and paternal anxiety were all negatively associated with the child's functional outcome. Clinically significant anxiety (based on clinical thresholds) was not found in fathers; however, continuous scores were still analyzed for association between subclinical anxiety and functional outcome, which revealed a statistically significant association between more reported symptoms and higher Recovery and Recurrence Questionnaire scores. Prevalence of PTSD and depression are greater in parents compared to the general population in this preliminary study.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Padres/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Boston/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
J Anxiety Disord ; 28(2): 241-5, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24507631

RESUMEN

A number of prominent theories suggest that hypervigilance and attentional bias play a central role in anxiety disorders and PTSD. It is argued that hypervigilance may focus attention on potential threats and precipitate or maintain a forward feedback loop in which anxiety is increased. While there is considerable data to suggest that attentional bias exists, there is little evidence to suggest that it plays this proposed but critical role. This study investigated how manipulating hypervigilance would impact the forward feedback loop via self-reported anxiety, visual scanning, and pupil size. Seventy-one participants were assigned to either a hypervigilant, pleasant, or control condition while looking at a series of neutral pictures. Those in the hypervigilant condition had significantly more fixations than those in the other two groups. These fixations were more spread out and covered a greater percentage of the ambiguous scene. Pupil size was also significantly larger in the hypervigilant condition relative to the control condition. Thus the study provided support for the role of hypervigilance in increasing visual scanning and arousal even to neutral stimuli and even when there is no change in self-reported anxiety. Implications for the role this may play in perpetuating a forward feedback loop are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad , Adolescente , Atención , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Fijación Ocular , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA