RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the short-term results of transanal rectocele repair with use of a linear stapler and Bioabsorbable Seamguard. METHODS: Ten women (median age, 56.1 y) with obstructed defecation syndrome were enrolled in the study. The preoperative study consisted of a medical history, physical examination, anoscopy, endoanal ultrasound, and defecography. All patients completed a severity score and a visual analog scale for global quality of life, and provided the postoperative dates of complications. RESULTS: Overall, the treatment significantly improved the obstructed defecation: the severity score improved from a median of 19.8 +/- 4.2 at baseline to 6.10 +/- 8.2 at one month (P < .005), 5.9 +/- 8.3 at 6 months (P < .005), and 6 +/- 8.3 at one year after the operation (P < .005). A significant improvement was observed in the visual analog scale, which improved from a median of 1.8 +/- 1.4 at baseline to 6 +/- 1.6 at one month (P < .005), 6.6 +/- 2.1 at 6 months (P < .004), and 7 +/- 2.5 at one year (P < .004). A significant improvement was also observed in various symptoms. Only 2 patients manifested urgent defecation. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that rectocele repair using a linear stapler and Seamguard is a safe, easy procedure, with a very low rate of complications and good immediate outcome.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Rectocele/cirugía , Grapado Quirúrgico , Suturas , Adulto , Anciano , Canal Anal , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Rectocele/complicaciones , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purposes of the study were the long-term evaluation of silicone implants with three-dimensional (3D) anal endosonography and its correlation with anal incontinence. METHODS: Fifteen patients were injected with silicone because of anal incontinence and co-existing internal anal sphincter disruption (n = 8) or thinning (n = 7). The evaluation was performed with the Wexner score and 3D anal endosonographies. RESULTS: Forty-four implants were performed. The endosonography at 3 months detected that all the implants were properly located. At 24 months, it detected 37/44 implants of initially injected and 33/37 were properly located. Four of 37 implants had moved and 7/44 were neither in the anus nor in the rectum. A total of 8/15 patients had their implants correctly placed. Globally, silicone implants significantly improved fecal continence. CONCLUSIONS: The silicone implants might have moved or even be lost. The continence deterioration suffered by most patients after the first year of the injection has no relation with the localization and number of implants that the patients have.
Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles/uso terapéutico , Endosonografía/métodos , Incontinencia Fecal/diagnóstico por imagen , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Geles de Silicona/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Canal Anal/diagnóstico por imagen , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Prótesis e Implantes , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study reports the results of injectable silicone PTQ implants for faecal incontinence due to internal anal sphincter (IAS) dysfunction. METHOD: Twenty patients (12 women) with partial faecal incontinence aged from 55 to 65 years were treated by a PTQ implant. All patients completed the Cleveland Clinic Continence and Quality of Life questionnaire. Endoluminal ultrasound and anorectal physiological testing were performed in each patient. All implants were inserted into the submucosal plane without ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: Faecal continence was significantly improved up to 1 year. The Wexner continence score fell from a median of 13.05 (range, 5-20) before treatment to 4.5 (range 2-7.7) at 1 month after (P < 0.005). This rose gradually to 6.2 (range, 0-16) at one year (P = 0.02) and 9.4 (range, 1-20) at 2 years (P = 0.127). There were no differences in resting or squeeze pressure before and at 3 months after treatment (P = 0.86 and P = 0.93). Fourteen (70%) patients experienced pruritus ani during the first few weeks after the procedure and one developed infection at the implant site. CONCLUSION: Silicone implantation is minimally invasive and technically simple. It is effective over 1 year in the treatment of faecal incontinence due to IAS dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/efectos de los fármacos , Materiales Biocompatibles/uso terapéutico , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/uso terapéutico , Incontinencia Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Materiales Biocompatibles/farmacología , Dimetilpolisiloxanos/farmacología , Endosonografía/métodos , Incontinencia Fecal/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Proctoscopía/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Staple line hemorrhage and leak are the 2 most dreaded complications of laparoscopyassisted resection of colorectal cancer (LARCC). Recently, anastomotic staple lines have been reinforced with a range of absorbable and non-absorbable bioprosthetic reinforcement materials. This pilot prospective study used the bioabsorbable Seamguard (BSG; WL Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) for routine reinforcement of the mesenteric vascular staple transection to prevent mesenteric hemorrhage and to assess its safety and feasibility in a consecutive series of laparoscopic colonic resections. METHODS: Twenty-five patients consecutively scheduled to undergo LARCC were enrolled in the study. All operations were performed with a standard LARCC technique which included loading of the BSG sleeves onto the jaws of the cutter/stapler. RESULTS: There were 23 wholly LARCC cases and 2 open conversions. BSG was used in all 25 patients. No patient experienced staple-line bleeding or other complications during the surgical procedure. The mean number of staple-line reinforcement sleeves used was 2.6 (range, 2-4). The mean operative time was 118 minutes (range, 65-184 minutes). Additional measures to achieve hemostasis were not required in any case. The mean cost was US 475.20 dollars for the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This small pilot study has shown the routine use of BSG mesenteric staple line reinforcement to be safe, quick and effective during LARCC.