RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: VARIVAX® (varicella virus vaccine, live Oka/Merck, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) was originally licensed as a frozen formulation. A refrigerator-stable formulation of VARIVAX was subsequently developed to allow for increased availability of the product around the world. The objective of this study (V210-051) was to demonstrate that the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profile of the refrigerator-stable formulation of VARIVAX was similar to the frozen formulation. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, healthy 12- to 23-month-old children with negative vaccination and clinical histories for measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and zoster were vaccinated with either a refrigerator-stable formulation of VARIVAX (at two dosage levels; 8000 PFU [Nâ¯=â¯320] or 25,000 PFU [Nâ¯=â¯315]) or the frozen formulation of VARIVAX (10,000 PFU, Nâ¯=â¯323) given concomitantly with M-M-RII® (measles, mumps, and rubella virus vaccine live, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Children were followed for 42â¯days after vaccination for adverse experiences. Immunogenicity was evaluated 6â¯weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: The refrigerator-stable formulation of VARIVAX was generally well tolerated. The incidence of adverse experiences was similar between all three groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse experiences were reported with any of the vaccine formulations. The immune response (percentage of subjects with varicella antibody titers ≥5 gpELISA units) for both refrigerator-stable formulations of VARIVAX at 6â¯weeks postvaccination was similar to that of the frozen formulation. Administration of either refrigerator-stable formulation of VARIVAX with M-M-RII yielded seroconversion rates and GMTs for measles, mumps and rubella that were comparable to those achieved after administration of the frozen formulation of VARIVAX with M-M-RII. CONCLUSION: The safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profile of the refrigerator-stable varicella vaccine was similar to that of the frozen formulation.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Criopreservación , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Refrigeración , Infección por el Virus de la Varicela-Zóster/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/química , Composición de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Seroconversión , Potencia de la VacunaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Widespread use of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in children has led to significant reduction in pneumococcal disease in children and adults. However, diseases caused by serotypes not included in PCV7 have increased. A 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) containing serotypes in PCV7 and 8 additional serotypes (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, 19A, 22F, 33F) was developed and evaluated in toddlers 12 to 15 months of age. METHODS: Ninety toddlers who completed an infant series with PCV7 received a single dose of either aluminum-adjuvanted PCV15, nonadjuvanted PCV15, or PCV7. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected for 14 days postvaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) were collected for 30 days postvaccination. Solicited AEs included local (pain/tenderness, swelling, nodule and redness) and systemic (fatigue, arthralgia and myalgia) AEs. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and opsonophagocytic (OPA) responses were measured immediately prior and 30 days postvaccination. RESULTS: Incidences of local and systemic AEs were comparable across vaccine groups. The majority of reported events, regardless of vaccine received, were transient and of mild to moderate intensity. No clinically significant differences were observed when comparing duration and severity of AEs. No vaccine-related SAEs or discontinuations from the study due to AEs were reported. Pneumococcal IgG concentrations and OPA titers increased postvaccination, with appreciable fold rises for all serotypes. Antibody levels were comparable between both PCV15 formulations and generally comparable to PCV7 for the shared serotypes. CONCLUSION: Both formulations of PCV15 display acceptable safety profiles and induce IgG and OPA responses to all vaccine serotypes.