RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Safer conception services promote the reproductive health and rights of families, while minimizing HIV transmission risks between partners trying to conceive, as well vertical transmission risks. Implementation data, including clients' experiences utilizing safer conception services in sub-Saharan Africa are limited. METHODS: Hillbrow Community Health Centre began offering safer conception services for individuals and couples affected by HIV in Johannesburg, South Africa in June 2015. A stratified sub-sample of safer conception clients were consecutively recruited from April 2016-August 2017 for a cross-sectional interview assessing clients' perceptions of service acceptability and value, as well as perceived safer conception knowledge and self-efficacy. Visual analog scales from 0 to 100 were used to measure clients' experiences; scores were classified as low, moderate and high acceptance/value/knowledge/self-efficacy if they were < 50, 50-79 and ≥ 80 respectively. Comparisons of scores were made across safer conception visits attended. RESULTS: Among 692 clients utilizing safer conception services, 120 (17%) were sampled for the process evaluation; sub-sample participant characteristics were similar to the overall cohort. Clients gave a mean score of ≥90-points for each question assessing service acceptability and 96% (114/119) indicated a high perceived value (scores ≥80) for regular safer conception attendance until conception. Fifty-eight percent (n = 70) of clients reported learning something new during the visit completed the day of the survey, though acquisition of new information tended to decrease as visits increased (p = 0.09). In terms of safer conception strategies, 80% of clients reported high levels of knowledge on the impact of antiretroviral treatment (ART) and viral suppression on HIV transmission, 67% reported high levels of knowledge of the importance of STI screening and 56% regarding limiting condomless sex to days of peak fertility; 34% in sero-different relationships reported high pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) knowledge. Self-efficacy varied by safer conception methods and was similar across study visits. CONCLUSIONS: Clients perceived high value from their safer conception visits and preferred regular attendance until conception, however we observed a plateau in knowledge and self-efficacy across subsequent visits after initially attending safer conception care. More intensive services may be appropriate for certain clients based on clinical circumstances, but many couples may potentially receive a 'lighter touch' approach while still minimizing HIV transmission risks.
Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones , Fertilización , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexo Seguro/psicología , Adulto , Consejo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , VIH/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Sexo Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Sudáfrica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sub-optimal cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries contributes to preventable cervical cancer deaths, particularly among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women. We assessed feasibility and outcomes of integrating cervical cancer screening into safer conception services for HIV-affected women. METHODS: At a safer conception service in Johannesburg, South Africa, HIV-affected women desiring pregnancy received a standard package of care designed to minimize HIV transmission risks while optimizing prepregnancy health. All eligible women were offered Papanicolaou smear, and those with significant pathology were referred for colposcopy before attempting pregnancy. Multivariable analyses identified associations between patient characteristics and abnormal pathology. RESULTS: In total, 454 women were enrolled between June 2015 and April 2017. At enrolment, 91% were HIV-positive, 92% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 82% virally suppressed. Eighty-three percent (376 of 454) of clients were eligible for cervical cancer screening and 85% (321 of 376) of these completed screening. More than half had abnormal cervical pathology (185 of 321) and 20% required colposcopy for possible high-grade or persistently atypical lesions (64 of 321). Compared with HIV-negative women, abnormal pathology was more likely among HIV-positive women, both those on ART <2 years (adjusted prevalence ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.0) and those on ART 2 years or longer (adjusted prevalence ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.2). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating cervical cancer screening into safer conception care was feasible with high coverage, including for HIV-positive women. Significant pathology, requiring colposcopy, was common, even among healthy women on ART. Safer conception services present an opportunity for integration of cervical cancer screening to avert preventable cancer-related deaths among HIV-affected women planning pregnancy.