Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Periodontol ; 29(5): 392-9, 2002 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12060421

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: For various clinical applications, polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (PHMB) has been used for many years as an antiseptic in medicine. Recently, a 0.04% PHMB mouthwash was shown to inhibit plaque regrowth and to reduce oral bacterial counts. In this study, a 0.12% PHMB mouthrinse (A) was compared with a negative control placebo rinse (10% ethanol, flavour) (B), a positive control 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse (C), and a commercially available mouthrinse containing essential oils (Listerine) (D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomised 4-replicate 4 x 4 Latin square cross-over design in which plaque regrowth was measured. The in vivo antibacterial effect was assessed by taking bacterial counts from the tooth surface and mucosa 4 h after the first rinse with the preparations on day 1 and prior to the clinical examination on day 5. 16 volunteers participated and, on day 1 of each study period, were rendered plaque-free, ceased toothcleaning, and rinsed 2x daily with the allocated mouthrinse. On day 5, plaque was scored and smears were collected according to the protocol. Washout periods were 9 days. Data were analysed using ANOVA with Bonferroni HSD adjustment for multiple comparisons (significance level alpha=0.05). RESULTS: The 0.12% PHMB mouthrinse (A) was significantly more effective in inhibiting plaque than the placebo (B) but no significant differences could be observed between A and 0.12% chlorhexidine (C), or between A and Listerine (D). Bacterial count reductions on the tooth surface with PHMB (A) were significantly greater compared to the placebo (B) after 4 h and significantly greater compared to B and D after 5 days. Chlorhexidine (C) was more effective than A after 5 days. On the mucosa, chlorhexidine (C) was significantly more effective in reducing bacterial counts than the other 3 treatments at both time points investigated. PHMB (A) was significantly more effective in reducing bacterial counts than the placebo (B) after 4 h and after 5 days, and than D after 4 h. CONCLUSION: Consistent with a previous study, a PHMB mouthrinse was shown to inhibit plaque recolonisation and to reduce oral bacterial counts, indicating that PHMB may find applications in the prevention of plaque-associated diseases.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Biguanidas/uso terapéutico , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Placa Dental/prevención & control , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Aceites Volátiles/uso terapéutico , Salicilatos/uso terapéutico , Terpenos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Biguanidas/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Estudios Cruzados , Placa Dental/microbiología , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mucosa Bucal/microbiología , Distribución Normal , Aceites Volátiles/administración & dosificación , Placebos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Salicilatos/administración & dosificación , Estadística como Asunto , Terpenos/administración & dosificación , Diente/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA