RESUMEN
This article reports a study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of regular oral care protocol developed specifically for adults in intensive care to prevent mucositis. Data were collected using oral mucositis assessment scale, oral cavity assessment tool, and the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The results indicated that oral mucositis can be reduced through the practice of administering oral care in accordance with oral health care guidelines. Oral care implemented in line with an evidence-based oral care guide and frequent observation of patients is the most important step in preventing oral mucositis.
Asunto(s)
Higiene Bucal , Estomatitis , Humanos , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Estomatitis/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Leucemia/complicaciones , Leucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to develop a bundle to increase safety of intra-hospital transport in critically ill patients. A qualitative design with Delphi approach was conducted for creation of an intra-hospital transport bundle in 3 steps. First, doctors and nurses were questioned about their encounters with intra-hospital transport incidents. Second, several databases were looked through to find published checklists and recommendations for intra-hospital transport. Third, using this strategy, a bundle was created and reviewed with subject matter experts. The content validity index (CVI), which assesses the degree of expert agreement, was utilized to evaluate each item in the generated bundle. Two evaluation cycles were required before a minimal index could be reached. We looked at the content validity and important weighting of the items. The scale-CVI was calculated using the average of all the elements, and it was 1. The created bundle serves as a framework for directing doctors and nurses during intra-hospital transportation and offers continuity of care to improve patient safety. The techniques suggested in this study can be used to adapt this bundle to the needs of other hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Técnica Delphi , Seguridad del Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Transporte de Pacientes/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Lista de VerificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients in intensive care units require comprehensive care. Hence, improving health care quality depends on accurate assessment and documentation. AIM: To develop and validate the content of an assessment sheet for critically ill patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A Delphi design study was conducted between January and March 2020. The content validity index (CVI) was used to calculate the degree of agreement among the experts to analyse the instrument and the entire set of items. Content validity was determined by seven experts (three critical care nursing professionals, two critical care doctors, and two anaesthesiologists) using a four-point Likert scale. They evaluated the items in terms of the following: 1 = "irrelevant," 2 = "somewhat relevant if the phrasing is profoundly adjusted," 3 = "relevant with some adjustment as to phrasing," and 4 = "very relevant." The CVI was applied, and the accepted value was ≥0.50. RESULTS: Three rounds of evaluation were required to achieve the minimum index. The items were reviewed for content and face validity. The instrument was validated with 86 items with a total CVI of 0.90, a face validity of 1, and a scale-level content validity index/universal agreement calculation method (S-CVI/UA) value of 0.813. CONCLUSION: This instrument can help nurses, doctors, academics, and students assess patients in intensive care units. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The daily assessment tool may provide a systematic and consistent approach to critically ill patients' assessment to guide interventions.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Críticos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered as one of the minimally invasive surgeries. Early postoperative pain alleviation is very important to avoid complications, at the same time, proper early pain control is an established fact to decrease the incidence of chronic pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) by a bupivacaine/ dexmedetomidine mixture on acute and chronic post-thoracoscopic surgery pain in patients undergoing VATS. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized prospective double-blinded trial. SETTING: Assiut University Hospitals, Orman Cardiology Hospital. METHODS: Sixty adult patients underwent elective VATS surgery under general anesthesia randomly allocated into 2 groups; Group I received thoracic PVB with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% (0.3 mL/kg) and Group II received PVB with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% (0.3 mL/kg) and dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg). Postoperative pain (at rest, with cough, and with movement) was assessed through a visual analog scale (VAS) every 30 minutes in the first 2 hours, then at the second, fourth, eighth, and 24th hours. Time to first analgesia request and consumption of intravenous rescue analgesia (ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg/dose) was recorded. Follow-up of the patients regarding the incidence of chronic post-thoracoscopic pain by the end of the third and sixth months after the procedure was reviewed through the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale. RESULTS: VAS score was significantly lower in Group II during the early postoperative 90 minute records. Pain with cough and with movement persisted to be significantly lower in Group II up to the second postoperative hour. Time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group II in comparison to Group (P < 0.001). There was less ketorolac consumption in Group II than in Group I (P = 0.002). At the third month, Group II showed significantly lower incidence of LANSS pain scale than Group I (P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: There was the heterogeneity of surgical procedures in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine PVB offers better pain relief during the early postoperative hours, and it carries a favorable effect on chronic postoperative pain.Clinical trial registry number: NCT03632161. KEY WORDS: Dexmedetomidine, paravertebral block, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, postoperative pain, chronic pain.