RESUMEN

Finite element (FE) modeling provides a means to examine how global kinematics of repetitive head loading in sports influences tissue level injury metrics. FE simulations of controlled soccer headers in two directions were completed using a human head FE model to estimate biomechanical loading on the brain by direction. Overall, headers were associated with 95th percentile peak maximum principal strains up to 0.07 and von Mises stresses up to 1450 Pa, and oblique headers trended toward higher values than frontal headers but below typical injury levels. These quantitative data provide insight into repetitive loading effects on the brain.

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: In the US, child fatalities in hot cars [i.e., pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH)] occur on average once every 10 days. Despite national campaigns and recurring media attention, there has been little change in the rate of PVH deaths annually. The objective of this study was to characterize caregivers' beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes related to PVH risk factors and potential mitigating technologies. METHODS/DATA SOURCES: We conducted a national survey of US caregivers to: (1) determine caregivers' perceptions of PVH risk for children in their care, as well as their thoughts about adopting risk mitigating technologies, (2) characterize scenarios in which caregivers intentionally leave children unattended in vehicles, and (3) assess caregiver awareness of national PVH campaigns. We used a variety of question formats (select all that apply, multiple choice, free response). Data were analyzed data using descriptive statistics and caregiver responses related to PVH event behaviors were compared across selected demographic characteristics using chi-square tests. RESULTS: Exactly 1,500 caregivers completed the survey; 60% were female and 60% were non-Hispanic White. Most, or 88%, of our respondents reported they do not leave their child(ren) alone in vehicles for any amount of time. However, there were differences in who engages in this behavior by caregivers' gender, education, income, and number of children. Few, or 12%, believed they were at any risk for having a child overheat in a vehicle, and most caregivers described negative and/or judgmental views of those who were at-risk. Nearly all participants indicated it was important that caregivers receive education about PVH (95%), and the majority, or 90%, responded they would be willing to adopt risk mitigating technology themselves, many believing they and others would be perceived as better caregivers if they did so. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This is the first nationally representative study to the authors' knowledge that characterizes caregivers' attitudes, behaviors, and perceived risk of PVH, along with their willingness to adopt mitigating technologies. Our dissonant finding that caregivers view those who may be at risk for PVH negatively while simultaneously viewing those who adopt risk mitigating strategies positively provides stakeholders with unique insight for future efforts. Specifically, messaging utilizing themes of positive caregiving might be more effective at increasing caregivers' adoption than threat-based campaigns focused on communicating risk. Additionally, our findings of demographic differences in behaviors related to PVH are a helpful first step to inform the development of tailored interventions (e.g., public messaging) and potential risk mitigating technologies that may be more likely to be widely adopted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the head and neck injury metrics of an anthropometric test device (ATD) in a rearward-facing child restraint system (CRS), with and without a support leg, in frontal-oblique impacts. METHODS: Sled tests using the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) 213 frontal crash pulse (48 km/h, 23 g) were performed with a simulated Consumer Reports test buck, which comprised a test bench that mimics the rear outboard vehicle seat of a sport utility vehicle (SUV). The test bench was rigidised to increase durability for repeated testing and the seat springs and cushion were replaced every five tests. A force plate was mounted to the floor of the test buck directly in front of the test bench to measure support leg peak reaction force. The test buck was rotated 30° and 60° relative to the longitudinal axis of the sled deck to represent frontal-oblique impacts. The door surrogate from the FMVSS 213a side impact test was rigidly attached to the sled deck adjacent to the test bench. The 18-month-old Q-Series (Q1.5) ATD was seated in a rearward-facing infant CRS, which was attached to the test bench with either rigid lower anchors or a three-point seatbelt. The rearward-facing infant CRS was tested with and without a support leg. Conductive foil was attached to the upper edge of the door panel and a strip of conductive foil was attached to the top of the ATD head so that a voltage signal quantified contact with the door panel. A new CRS was used for each test. A repeat test was performed for each condition for a total of 16 tests. DATA SOURCES: Resultant linear head acceleration 3 ms clip; head injury criterion 15 ms (HIC15); peak neck tensile force; peak neck flexion moment; potential difference between the ATD head and the door panel; support leg peak reaction force. RESULTS: The presence of a support leg significantly reduced head injury metrics (p < 0.001) and peak neck tensile force (p = 0.004) compared to tests without a support leg. Rigid lower anchors were associated with significant reductions in head injury metrics and peak neck flexion moment (p < 0.001) compared to tests that attached the CRS with the seatbelt. The 60° frontal-oblique tests had significantly elevated head injury metrics (p < 0.01) compared to the 30° frontal-oblique tests. No ATD head contact with the door was observed for 30° frontal-oblique tests. The ATD head contacted the door panel in the 60° frontal-oblique tests when the CRS was tested without the support leg. Average support leg peak reaction forces ranged from 2167 to 4160 N. The 30° frontal-oblique sled tests had significantly higher support leg peak reaction forces (p < 0.001) compared to the 60° frontal-oblique sled tests. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study add to the growing body of evidence regarding the protective benefits of CRS models with a support leg and rigid lower anchors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTIONS / OBJECTIVE: Test protocols evaluate restraint performance with pediatric ATDs placed in an ideal seating posture. However, real-world evidence suggests that ideal test conditions do not always reflect actual occupant positions. Prior studies have also shown that booster seat designs affect the position of the seatbelt around the child. Occupants in naturalistic seating postures, coupled with potentially unfavorable seatbelt positions, could result in adverse kinematics and kinetics in a crash. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the effect of different naturalistic seating postures on the response of the Q6 ATD restrained on boosters with varying initial static belt fit in a frontal impact. METHODS/DATA SOURCES: The Q6 ATD was positioned on two booster seats of similar design but varying static belt fit metrics in three seating postures: reference, leaning forward, and leaning inboard. These booster seats were chosen from extensive belt fit studies on human volunteers and ATDs, and were defined as follows:The booster-seated ATD was restrained on the simulated Consumer Reports test buck (2010 Ford Flex 2nd row seat) with a front blocker plate using a 3-point lap-shoulder belt with a retractor and pretensioner. The sled environment was subjected to the FMVSS 213 frontal impact pulse, and each booster and seating posture was evaluated twice (n = 12 sled tests). Kinematic and kinetic measures were recorded. A linear regression analysis was conducted across postures on each booster. Further, a paired t-test analysis was conducted across booster seats for each seating posture. RESULTS: Across seating postures, the reference posture exhibited similar or higher kinematic and kinetic metric values compared to the leaning forward and leaning inboard postures on both boosters. However, both leaning forward (Booster A = 279.5 ± 21.6 mm; Booster B = 298.8 ± 1.5 mm) and leaning inboard (Booster A = 308.7 ± 1.1 mm; Booster B = 331.4 ± 8.5 mm) postures generally resulted in greater head excursion than the reference posture (Booster A = 285.0 ± 16.9 mm; Booster B = 288.1 ± 1.5 mm), indicating greater potential for head contact. Between boosters, Booster A resulted in significantly lower head 3 ms clip acceleration (p = 0.0026), HIC15 (p = 0.0008), upper neck tensile force (Fz)(p = 0.0057), chest 3 ms clip acceleration (p = 0.0013), and right abdominal pressure (p = 0.0163), and significantly higher left ASIS force (Fx)(p = 0.0150) and left (p = 0.0489) and right (p = 0.0088) ASIS moment (My) than Booster B. Upper neck tensile forces on Booster B crossed the 20% and 50% thresholds for AIS3 + injury. Lower abdominal pressure and higher ASIS forces and moments on Booster A suggest that the lap belt loaded the ASIS appropriately, and hence, relatively better kinematics than Booster B. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This study shows that booster design affects static belt fit which can have an effect on dynamic crash performance and assessment criteria. By connecting static belt fit to dynamic performance, these effects may have the potential to help guide booster seat design.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the kinematics and kinetics of a naturalistically seated 6-year-old (6YO) pediatric human body model and evaluate the metrics described by earlier studies for pediatric ATDs to indicate whether different postures and booster seats were more associated with submarining than others in a frontal impact. METHODS: The PIPER 6YO pediatric human body model was restrained on a lowback (LBB) and a highback (HBB) booster child restraint seat (CRS) in four naturalistic seating postures: leaning-forward, leaning-inboard, leaning-outboard, and a pre-submarining posture, and a baseline reference seating position as per the FMVSS No. 213 protocol. A 2012 mid-size sedan finite element (FE) model was used as the vehicle environment. A standard 3-point lap-shoulder belt system was modeled to restrain the child and the CRS in the left-rear vehicle seat. Additionally, a No-CRS condition was modeled in a reference posture and pre-submarining posture in which the occupant's legs bent over the edge of the rear seat. 12 conditions were simulated in LS-DYNA R10.1.0, and kinematics and kinetics were compared to metrics as per prior literature: 1) maximum femur displacement and pelvis rotation, 2) maximum knee-head excursion and maximum change in torso angle, 3) lap belt trajectory relative to pelvis's coordinate frame. RESULTS: The pre-submarining posture on the HBB depicted submarining in all metrics except for the lap belt trajectory. Only the pre-submarining posture in No-CRS depicted submarining through analysis of all metrics. For this pre-submarining No-CRS condition, the mid-abdominal compression was approximately 5 times greater than the average of the mid abdominal compression depths of all other cases and maximum abdominal pressure was at least 22.9 kPa higher than the rest of the conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that metrics used to assess submarining for 6YO pediatric occupants in frontal impacts may need to be updated so that they are more accurate for both simulated and physical studies. In addition, the results of this study could be used to design booster seats that discourage postures that could lead to an increased likelihood of submarining-like characteristics in a frontal crash impact.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The effect of reclined seatbacks during frontal crashes in children seated on a belt-positioning booster (BPB) is not understood. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine submarining in reclined child occupants with and without a BPB and with and without a simulated pre-pretensioner (PPT). We used the Large Omnidirectional Child (LODC) Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) seated on a production vehicle seat with and without a moderately reclined seatback angle during sled-simulated frontal vehicle crashes. METHODS: Ten sled-simulated frontal impact tests were performed (24 g peak, 80 ms duration, 56 km/h delta-V). An adjustable D-ring anchor simulated a seat integrated belt. A fixed load-limited 3-point seatbelt webbing system was used to secure the LODC to a vehicle seat and booster seat. We compared the following conditions: a) BPB vs no-BPB and b) 25° versus 45° seatback angles, c) PPT, vs no-PPT in 45° seatback condition, each test was repeated. Abdominal forces (left and right), seatbelt loads, Anterior-Superior-Illiac-Spine forces (ASIS, upper and lower, left and right), and pelvis rotation were analyzed. RESULTS: Average peak abdominal pressures were smaller in both nominal and moderate recline positions in the BPB (25°: 73.7 kPa, 45°: 82.5 kPa) compared to the no-BPB conditions (25°: 168.4 kPa, 45°: 339.1 kPa). In the 45° recline no-BPB conditions, both the peaks of the lap belt force and ASIS forces occurred early and a rapid reduction in those forces followed. This change in the lap belt and ASIS forces accompanied a rearward rotation of the pelvis. During the reduction of ASIS and lap belt forces, there was an increase in abdominal pressure suggesting that the lap belt moved upward, off the ASIS, and into the abdominal pressure sensor. There was a slight reduction in head and knee excursion with the PPT. These results suggest the presence of submarining in the 45° recline no-BPB conditions but not in the 45° recline with the BPB. CONCLUSIONS: The BPB could be beneficial when the seatback is moderately reclined. The differences during the moderate recline between the BPB and no-BPB conditions also indicate that the BPB could prevent submarining in moderately reclined seats.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Seating configurations for autonomous driving will include reclined front seated occupants, which may expose child occupants seated directly behind to head impacts even in pre-crash scenarios. This study used mathematical modelling to investigate head contact for second-row child occupants seated behind a reclined front-seat during an automatic emergency braking (AEB) scenario. Although characterized by low speed (<1 m/s), head contacts were observed for a seatbelt-restrained 10-year-old and a 6-year-old in a low-back booster when the front-seat was reclined and in an aftward track position. Future seating configurations should consider the potential for head contact by second-row child occupants during crash-avoidance scenarios.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Previous studies of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models have focused on frontal impacts and have found that the presence of a support leg is associated with a reduction in head injury metrics. However, real-world crashes often involve an oblique principal direction of force. The current study used sled tests to evaluate the effectiveness of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models for frontal and frontal-oblique impacts with and without a simulated front row seatback. Frontal and frontal-oblique impact sled tests were conducted using the simulated Consumer Reports test method with and without the blocker plate, which was developed to represent a front row seatback. The Q1.5 anthropomorphic test device (ATD) was seated in rearward-facing infant CRS models, which were tested with and without support legs. The presence of a support leg was associated with significant reductions of head injury metrics below injury tolerance limits for all tests, which supports the findings of previous studies. The presence of a support leg was also associated with significant reductions of peak neck tensile force. The presence of the blocker plate resulted in greater head injury metrics compared to tests without the blocker plate, but the result was non-significant. However, the fidelity of the interaction between the CRS and blocker plate as an adequate representation of the interaction that would occur in a real vehicle is not well understood. The findings from the current study continue to support the benefit of support legs in managing the energy of impact for a child in a rearward-facing CRS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Motor vehicle crashes remain a significant problem. Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have the potential to reduce crash incidence and severity, but their optimization requires a comprehensive understanding of driver-specific errors and environmental hazards in real-world crash scenarios. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to quantify contributing factors using the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS), identify potential ADAS interventions, and make suggestions to optimize ADAS for real-world crash scenarios. METHODS: A subset of the SHRP 2 NDS consisting of at-fault crashes (n = 369) among teens (16-19 yrs), young adults (20-24 yrs), adults (35-54 yrs) and older adults (70+ yrs) were reviewed to identify contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions. Contributing factors were classified according to National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey pre-crash assessment variable elements. A single critical factor was selected among the contributing factors for each crash. Case reviews with a multidisciplinary panel of industry experts were conducted to develop suggestions for ADAS optimization. Critical factors were compared across at-risk driving groups, gender, and incident type using chi-square statistics and multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Driver error was the critical factor in 94% of crashes. Recognition error (56%), including internal distraction and inadequate surveillance, was the most common driver error sub-type. Teens and young adults exhibited greater decision errors compared to older adults (p < 0.01). Older adults exhibited greater performance errors (p < 0.05) compared to teens and young adults. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) had the greatest potential to mitigate crashes (48%), followed by vehicle-to-vehicle communication (38%) and driver monitoring (24%). ADAS suggestions for optimization included (1) implementing adaptive forward collision warning, AEB, high-speed warning, and curve-speed warning to account for road surface conditions (2) ensuring detection of nonstandard road objects, (3) vehicle-to-vehicle communication alerting drivers to cross-traffic, (4) vehicle-to-infrastructure communication alerting drivers to the presence of pedestrians in crosswalks, and (5) optimizing lane keeping assist for end-departures and pedal confusion. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of critical factors among at-risk drivers as well as suggestions for ADAS improvements based on naturalistic data. Such data can be used to optimize ADAS for driver-specific errors and help develop more robust vehicle test procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study quantifies the kinematics of children in booster child restraint systems (CRSs) in various naturalistic seating postures exposed to frontal impacts in a full-vehicle environment, with and without the application of pre-crash automatic emergency braking. METHODS: The PIPER 6YO and 10YO pediatric human body models were positioned in CRSs. The 6YO was restrained on a lowback (LBB) and highback (HBB) booster, while the 10YO was positioned on an LBB and in a NoCRS condition. All simulations used the 3-point seatbelt. The child models were pre-positioned (gravity settled, seatbelt tensioned) in four naturalistic seating postures: leaning-forward, leaning-forward-inward, leaning-forward-outward, and a pre-submarining position, along with a baseline reference seating position. A 2012 Toyota Camry finite element (FE) model was used as the vehicle environment. A standard 3-point lap-shoulder belt system was modeled to restrain the child and CRS in the left-rear vehicle seat. Two vehicle impact cases were considered: with and without a pre-crash AEB. For with-AEB cases, a pre-crash phase was run to incorporate postural changes due to the application of AEB. All seating positions were ultimately subjected to a full-frontal rigid-barrier impact at 35 MPH. A total of 40 conditions were simulated in LS-DYNA. RESULTS: Injury metrics varied widely for both occupants. Shoulder belt slippage was observed for the 6YO leaning-forward-inward on HBB. No head contact was observed for any simulated cases. Forward-leaning and forward-inward-leaning postures generally had greater head excursion across all seating postures. The lap belt rode over the pelvis for pre-submarining postures. Injury metrics for cases with pre-crash AEB were lower compared to their corresponding without-AEB cases. HIC15, head acceleration, upper neck tension force, and upper neck flexion moment were similar or lower for with-AEB scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-crash AEB reduces the effect of the impact despite the same collision speed as cases without-AEB. This is primarily due to the limited travel distance of the occupant, thus, starting an earlier ride-down during the crash. Moreover, different initial seating postures lead to a wide range of injury exposures. Vehicle and child restraint design should incorporate these seating postures to ensure robust protection of the occupant in a crash.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A correctly used child restraint system (CRS) is associated with a substantial reduction of injury and mortality risks in motor vehicle crashes and epidemiologic data suggests that toddlers are provided greater protection when restrained in a rearward-facing CRS compared to a forward-facing CRS. Some 'extended-use' European CRS models can accommodate children up to six years rearward-facing and have a support (load) leg and/or a pair of lower (Swedish) tethers to reduce rotation during frontal and rear impacts, respectively. Laboratory studies have found that a support leg reduces head and neck injury metrics of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) younger than three years in rearward-facing CRS models during frontal impacts. The objectives of the current study were to perform sled tests to: (1) evaluate the effects of using a support leg in rearward-facing infant and extended-use convertible CRS models during frontal impacts, (2) evaluate the effects of using a pair of lower tethers in a rearward-facing extended-use convertible CRS model during rear impacts and (3) compare responses of ATDs in an extendeduse convertible CRS with a support leg and a pair of lower tethers in rearward- and forward-facing configurations during frontal and rear impacts. The presence of a support leg in rearward-facing infant and extended-use convertible CRS models in frontal impacts was associated with reductions in head injury metrics across a range of pediatric ATDs and neck injury metrics were below injury tolerance values. Other strategies in the design of rearward-facing CRS and front row vehicle seatbacks may be available to further reduce head injury metrics. Lower tethers reduced the rearward rotation of an extended-use convertible CRS toward the vehicle seatback in rear impacts and were typically associated with reductions in head and neck injury metrics for the Q6 ATD, but not the Q3 ATD. For frontal impacts, neck injury metrics were typically greater for ATDs in the forward-facing extended-use convertible CRS, whereas head injury metrics were typically greater for the rearward-facing condition (with a support leg and a pair of lower tethers). Interactions of the ATD head and/or the rearward-facing extended-use convertible CRS with the blocker plate in rearward-facing frontal impacts need to be further investigated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore how age and sex impact the ability to respond to an emergency when in a self-driving vehicle.Methods: For this study, 60 drivers (male: 48%, female: 52%) of different age groups (teens: aged 16-19, 32%, adults: aged 35-54, 37%, seniors: aged 65+, 32%) were recruited to share their perspectives on self-driving technology. They were invited to ride in a driving simulator that mimicked a vehicle in autopilot mode (longitudinal and lateral control).Results: In a scenario where the automated vehicle unexpectedly drives toward a closed highway exit, 21% of drivers did not react at all. For this event, where drivers had 6.2 s to avoid a crash, 40% of drivers crashed. Adults aged 35-54 crashed less than other age groups (33% crash rate), whereas teens crashed more (47% crash rate). Seniors had the highest crash rate (50% crash rate). Males (38% crash rate) crashed less than females (43% crash rate). All participants with a reaction time less than 4 s were able to avoid the crash.Conclusions: The results from the simulation drives show that humans lose focus when they do not actively drive so that their response in an emergency does not allow them to reclaim control quickly enough to avoid a crash.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Motor vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of death for children. Traditionally, restraint design has focused on the crash phase of the impact with an optimally seated occupant. In order to optimize restrain design for real-world scenarios, research has recently expanded its focus to non-traditional loading conditions including pre-crash positioning and lower speed impacts. The goal of this study was to evaluate the biofidelity of the large omni-directional child (LODC) ATD in non-traditional loading conditions by comparing its response to pediatric volunteer data in low-speed sled tests. Low-speed (2-4 g, 1.9-3.0 m/s) frontal (0°), far-side oblique (60°), and far-side lateral (90º) sled tests, as well as lateral swerving (0.72 g, 0.5 Hz) tests, were conducted using the LODC. The LODC was restrained using a 3-point-belt with an electromechanical motorized seat belt retractor, or pre-pretensioner. Motion capture markers were placed on the head, torso, and belt. The LODC was compared to previously collected pediatric volunteer data as well as the HIII 10 and Q10. Significant difference between the pediatric volunteers and ATDs were identified by comparing the mean ATD response to the pediatric volunteer 95% CI. The LODC exhibited lower forward head excursion (262 mm) compared to pediatric volunteers (263 - 333 mm) in low-speed frontal sled tests (p<0.05), but was closer to the pediatric volunteers than the HIII 10 (179 mm) and Q10 (171 mm). In lateral swerving, the LODC (429 mm) exhibited greater lateral head excursion (p<0.05) compared to pediatric volunteers (115 - 171 mm). The LODC exhibited a greater reduction in kinematics compared to the pediatric volunteers in all loading conditions with a pre-pretensioner. These data provide valuable insight into the biofidelity of the LODC in non-traditional loading conditions, such as evaluating pre-crash maneuvers on occupant response.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Booster seats ensure appropriate belt fit for children that a traditional vehicle seat belt cannot offer to small occupants. In this study, the responses of the PIPER 6-year-old human body model are compared to the traditional Q6 anthropomorphic test dummy (ATD). METHODS: Eight frontal impact finite element simulations were run using 4 different child restraining systems on the FMVSS 213 test bench. Kinematics and kinetics were extracted and compared between the 2 child models. RESULTS: The PIPER 6-year-old showed variation by 11.2 ± 14.1% (head resultant acceleration, G), 20.4 ± 50.3% (chest resultant acceleration, G), 272.9 ± 188.4% (chest displacement, mm), 24.8 ± 17.5% (maximum head excursion, mm), -31.5 ± 5.1% (neck force, Fz, N), -73.8 ± 2.8% (neck moment, My, N.m), and -60.4 ± 7.2% (Nij) compared to the Q6. However, the kinematics of both models were nearly similar. CONCLUSIONS: The PIPER model has a flexible neck and shows higher chest displacement compared to the Q6. We hypothesize that this is due to the inherent anatomical and mechanical differences between the human body model and the ATD model. More research is needed to explore these differences systematically.

Asunto(s)