Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 43(9): 599-603, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297163

RESUMEN

The population attempting pregnancy and having babies is ageing. The declining fertility potential and the late age of motherhood are increasing significantly the number of patients over forty consulting infertility specialists. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) cannot compensate the natural decline in fertility with age. In France, in public hospital, ART is free of charge for women until 43 years, over 43, social insurance does not reimburse ART. Hence, 43 years is the usual limit, but between 40 and 42 is ART useful? The answer varies according to physicians, couples or society. On medical level, the etiology of the infertility must be taken into account. If there is an explanation to infertility (male or tubal infertility) ART is better than abstention. If the infertility is only due to age the question is raised. In France, the reimbursement by the society of a technique with very low results is discussed. However efficacy is not absolutely compulsory in Medicine. On the opposite to give false hopes may be discussed too. To obtain a reasonable consensus is rather difficult.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Infertilidad/terapia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Adulto , Contraindicaciones , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Francia , Humanos , Infertilidad/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Infertilidad Masculina/terapia , Masculino , Embarazo , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/economía , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 41(7-8): 437-8, 2013.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23602076

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of relation between uterine devices and severe pelvic inflammatory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical data for 5 years were collected in an universitary center. RESULTS: Seventy patients were found whose seven needed reanimation and ten, two or more surgical procedures. Risks factors were old age (>45 years) and time exposure (>5 years). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Severe pelvic inflammatory disease and uterine devices in not uncommon association. Prolonged use seems to be a risk factor.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA