RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Massachusetts became the first state in the nation to ban ambulance diversion in 2009. It was feared that the diversion ban would lead to increased emergency department (ED) crowding and ambulance turnaround time. We seek to characterize the effect of a statewide ambulance diversion ban on ED length of stay and ambulance turnaround time at Boston-area EDs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, pre-post observational analysis of 9 Boston-area hospital EDs before and after the ban. We used ED length of stay as a proxy for ED crowding. We compared hospitals individually and in aggregate to determine any changes in ED length of stay for admitted and discharged patients, ED volume, and turnaround time. RESULTS: No ED experienced an increase in ED length of stay for admitted or discharged patients or ambulance turnaround time despite an increase in volume for several EDs. There was an overall 3.6% increase in ED volume in our sample, a 10.4-minute decrease in length of stay for admitted patients, and a 2.2-minute decrease in turnaround time. When we compared high- and low-diverting EDs separately, neither saw an increase in length of stay, and both saw a decrease in turnaround time. CONCLUSION: After the first statewide ambulance diversion ban, there was no increase in ED length of stay or ambulance turnaround time at 9 Boston-area EDs. Several hospitals actually experienced improvements in these outcome measures. Our results suggest that the ban did not worsen ED crowding or ambulance availability at Boston-area hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Ambulancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Ambulancias/organización & administración , Boston , Aglomeración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Política de Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: On July 12, 2010, Boston Medical Center (BMC), the busiest emergency department (ED) in Massachusetts, with more than 100,000 adult patient visits per year, consolidated its two fully functional EDs into one. In preparation for this consolidation, BMC implemented systems changes to mitigate potential negative effects on both BMC and emergency medical services (EMS) providers, including Boston Emergency Medical Services (Boston EMS), the provider of 9-1-1 EMS to the City of Boston. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of the closure of an ED on an urban EMS system in a setting where ambulance diversion is not allowed. METHODS: We performed a before-and-after study that examined the effects of an ED closure on BMC and Boston EMS. We examined ED and Boston EMS volumes and ambulance turnaround intervals from June 1, 2010, to July 11, 2010 (preclosure) as compared with July 12, 2010, to August 26, 2010 (postclosure). Mean ED and Boston EMS volumes and Boston EMS turnaround intervals were calculated in four-hour shifts. We used multivariate analysis to analyze electronic medical systems data from BMC and Boston EMS and linear regression. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to determine the effect of the ED closure on turnaround intervals, ED volumes, and transport volumes. All analyses were adjusted for shift, ED volume, day of the week, and citywide EMS transport volumes. RESULTS: After ED closure, there was a statistically significant increase of 0.89 minutes (p = 0.02) in the mean EMS turnaround intervals. Additionally, the total ED volume decreased by 3.67 visits per shift (p < 0.001). The ratio of patients transported by Boston EMS to BMC remained unchanged (p = 0.11) for two weeks before and two weeks after the closure. CONCLUSIONS: The closure of one ED resulted in a statistically significant increase in turnaround intervals and a significant decrease in ED volume independent of EMS volumes. In the absence of ambulance diversion, ratios of EMS turnaround intervals and EMS volumes according to hospital destination can be used as alternatives to ambulance diversion times to examine the effects of system-level changes such as closure of an ED on an urban EMS system.