Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 2024 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39128789

RESUMEN

TOPIC: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). The outcomes examined are changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Neovascularization (NV), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), and adverse outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in working-aged adults globally. At present, no consensus has been reached on the optimal choice for the treatment of PDR. METHODS: Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CiNAHL were searched for articles from their inception to June 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 1. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023437778). Tool Data analysis was performed using RevMan software version 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark). Randomized control trials (RCTs) of PDR patients treated with anti-VEGF, PRP, or a combination were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Rob2 assessment tool (revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials), and certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, with 1,361 patients (n eyes=1,788) treated for PDR with either anti-VEGF (n=274), PRP (n=482), or combination (n=320). Our results show more favorable BCVA outcomes with anti-VEGF compared to PRP at 3 months (MD=2.35 letters, 95% CI: 1.18, 3.52, I2=0%) and 12 months follow-up (MD=3.39 letters, 95% CI: 0.63, 6.14, I2=26%). Combination treatment showed better BCVA outcomes compared to PRP at 12 months (MD=4.06 letters, 95% CI: 0.26, 7.86, I2=0%). Combination showed lower CMT at 3 months (MD=-33.10 µm, 95% CI: -40.12, -26.08, I2=25%) and 6 months (MD=-34.28 µm, 95% CI: -55.59, -12.97, I2=85%) compared to PRP, but CMT results were similar at 12 months. Complete regression of Total Neovascularization (NVT) was more likely with anti-VEGF compared to PRP (OR=6.15, 95% CI: 1.39, 27.15, I2=80%). Post-treatment vitreous hemorrhage, vitrectomy, and increased intraocular pressure (IOP) events were similar between the anti-VEGF and combination groups compared to PRP, however, macular edema results favored the anti-VEGF over the PRP group. Using the GRADE assessment, BCVA evidence was rated to be of moderate certainty, while CMT and NVT evidence certainty was rated as very low. CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF and combination treatments could be regarded as alternative approaches to PRP alone in the management of PDR after engaging in a shared decision-making process based on patients' adherence, diabetic macular edema (DME) status, and preference. Limitations of this meta-analysis include the heterogeneity in participants' characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcome reporting between studies. Further RCTs should be conducted to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in the long term.

3.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 260: 1-13, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797866

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids in the postoperative management of cataract surgery for age-related cataract in adults. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched for articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022364733). Randomized controlled trials of patients undergoing age-related cataract surgery treated with corticosteroids, NSAIDs, or a combination were included. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included, with 3473 patients (3638 eyes) treated following cataract surgery with NSAIDs (n = 1479), corticosteroids (n = 1307), or a combination (n = 687). Combination treatment demonstrated favorable best-corrected visual acuity compared to corticosteroids 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively (MD = -0.01 logMAR, 95% CI: -0.02, -0.01, I2 = 0%). NSAIDs had more favorable flare values than corticosteroids on day 7 (MD = -9.17 photons/ms, 95% CI = -16.52, -1.82, I2 = 94%), day 14 (MD = -5.23 photons/ms, 95% CI = -8.35, -2.11, I2 = 94%), and 4 to 6 weeks (MD = -1.62 photons/ms, 95% CI = -3.03, -0.20, I2 = 93%) postoperatively. Furthermore, 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively, patients treated with NSAIDs showed lower central macular thickness (MD = -13.26 µm, 95% CI = -18.66, -7.86, I2 = 81%) compared to those treated with corticosteroids. NSAIDs and combination treatment were associated with a lower incidence of central macular edema (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.07, 0.35, I2 = 61%; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10, 0.45, I2 = 31%) than corticosteroids 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs and combination treatments could be regarded as more effective and safer alternatives to corticosteroids alone in the postoperative management of cataract surgery. Further studies should be conducted to determine why this evidence has not been reflected in practice patterns, and to further compare the effectiveness of NSAIDs and combination treatments.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Edema Macular , Adulto , Humanos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Catarata/complicaciones , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiología
4.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1266424, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37810604

RESUMEN

Background: We conducted a review of all studies comparing clinical aspects of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) between men and women. Methods: Five databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus and Clinical Trials) were searched for clinical studies using the keywords "alcohol withdrawal syndrome" or "delirium tremens" limited to "sex" or "gender" or "sex difference" or "gender difference." The search was conducted on May 19, 2023. Two reviewers selected studies including both male and female patients with AWS, and they compared males and females in type of AWS symptoms, clinical course, complications, and treatment outcome. Results: Thirty-five observational studies were included with a total of 318,730 participants of which 75,346 had AWS. In twenty of the studies, the number of patients presenting with or developing AWS was separated by sex, resulting in a total of 8,159 (12.5%) female patients and a total of 56,928 (87.5%) male patients. Despite inconsistent results, males were more likely than females to develop complicated AWS [delirium tremens (DT) and AW seizures, collective DT in Males vs. females: 1,792 (85.4%) vs. 307 (14.6%), and collective seizures in males vs. females: 294 (78%) vs. 82 (22%)]. The rates of ICU admissions and hospital length of stay did not show sex differences. Although variable across studies, compared to females, males received benzodiazepine treatment at higher frequency and dose. One study reported that the time from first hospitalization for AWS to death was approximately 1.5 years shorter for males and males had higher mortality rate [19.5% (197/1,016)] compared to females [16% (26/163)]. Conclusion: Despite the significant heterogeneity of the studies selected and the lack of a focus on investigating potential sex differences, this review of clinical studies on AWS suggests that men and women exhibit different AWS manifestations. Large-scale studies focusing specifically on investigating sex difference in AWS are needed.

5.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 1071397, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36713915

RESUMEN

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore overall prevalence of burnout among physicians during early and late COVID-19 pandemic and geographical differences in burnout. Methods: This review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022327959). A comprehensive search of several databases, including Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, and Scopus, spanning from December 2019 to May 2022 was conducted. Eligible studies included physicians or medical professionals including physicians that worked directly or indirectly with COVID-19 patients, whilst reporting burnout outcomes using a validated scale. Literature that did not include physicians or did not occur in a hospital setting were excluded. Literature including medical students were also excluded. Results: Forty-five observational studies were included, all of which were cross-sectional studies. The pooled estimate of overall prevalence of burnout was 54.60% (95% CI: 46.7, 62.2). Mean emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment was found to be 22.06% (95% CI: 18.19, 25.94), 8.72 (95% CI: 6.48, 10.95) and 31.18 (95% CI: 27.33, 35.03) respectively. Frontline workers displayed higher rates of burnout than second-line healthcare workers (HCW) (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.37). Studies from the early pandemic period reported burnout prevalence of 60.7% (95% CI: 48.2, 72) compared to a prevalence of 49.3% (95% CI: 37.7, 60.9) from the late pandemic period. Geographically, burnout was highest amongst Middle East and North Africa (MENA) studies (66.6%, 95% CI: 54.7, 78.5), followed by Europe (48.8%, 95% CI: 40.3, 57.3) and then South America (42%, 95% CI: -0.4, 84.4). Lastly, burnout prevalence overall (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.36, 1.67) emotional exhaustion (MD = -0.36, 95% CI: -4.64, 3.91), depersonalization (MD = -0.31, 95% CI: -1.80, 1.18), and personal accomplishment (MD = 0.55, 95% CI: -0.73, 1.83) were found comparable between physicians and nurses. Conclusion: COVID-19 has had significant consequences on HCW burnout. Further research is needed to examine early signs of burnout and to develop effective coping strategies.

6.
Neuroepidemiology ; : 1-12, 2021 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33567436

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a major health concern worldwide with a large impact in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region as a consequence of protracted wars and conflicts that adversely affect the general population. Currently, systematic TBI studies in the MENA region are lacking, nonetheless they are immensely needed to enhance trauma management and increase survival rates among TBI patients. This systematic review aims to characterize TBI in the MENA region to guide future policy choices and research efforts and inform tailored guidelines capable of improving TBI management and patient treatment and outcome. Furthermore, it will serve as a road map to evaluate and assess knowledge of trauma impact on regional health systems that can be adopted by health-care providers to raise awareness and improve trauma care. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search strategy of several databases including MEDLINE/Ovid, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the grey literature in accordance with the PROSPERO systematic review protocol CRD42017058952. Abstracts were screened, and selected eligible studies were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers. We collected demographics information along with TBI characteristics, mortality rates, and regional distribution. Data were extracted using REDCap and checked for accuracy. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 23,385 citations; 147 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Motor vehicle accident (MVA) was the leading cause of TBI (41%) in the MENA region, followed by the military- (15.6%) and fall- (8.8%) related TBI. Males predominantly suffer from TBI-related injuries (85%), with a high prevalence of MVA- and military-related TBI injuries. The TBI mortality rate was 12.9%. The leading causes of mortality were MVA (68%), military (20.5%), and assault (2.9%). The vast majority of reported TBI severity was mild (63.1%) compared to moderate (10.7%) and severe TBI (20.2%). Patients mainly underwent a Glasgow Coma Scale assessment (22.1%), followed by computed tomography scan (8.9%) and surgery (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its clinical, social, and economic burden, the evidence of TBI research in the MENA region is scarce. Further research and high-quality epidemiological studies are urgently needed to gain a deep understanding of the TBI burden in the region, facilitate the allocation of adequate resources, implement effective preventive and intervention strategies and advise on the TBI patient management as reflective on the TBI patterns and modes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA