Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 48(7): 532-537, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734069

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of endometriosis is estimated to be about 10% among women of reproductive age. In about 5-10% of these patients, involvement of urological structures will be developed due to deep endometriosis. Urologists should be familiar with the management of these patients, who will require multidisciplinary care with medical and surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with deep endometriosis involving urological structures who underwent surgery performed jointly with gynecology and colorectal surgery departments from June 2012 until June 2021 (60 cases). Urologic symptoms were grouped into 3 groupers for subsequent analysis (storage symptoms, voiding symptoms, and low back pain). RESULTS: Storage symptoms (frequency and urgency) are the most frequent urologic symptoms. Patients with storage symptoms and low back pain showed improvement after surgery. In contrast, patients with voiding symptoms did not improve with surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of endometriosis and the likelihood of involving urologic structures require the urologic community to be aware of the pathology. Patients with storage symptoms will improve following excision of the endometriotic nodules. The need for Partial cystectomies with ureteral reimplantation can be safely performed by laparoscopic or robotic approach, even in previously operated patients, without compromising long-term function.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Humanos , Endometriosis/cirugía , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Enfermedades Urológicas/cirugía , Enfermedades Urológicas/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 23(6): 1210-1219, jun. 2021. graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-221342

RESUMEN

Purpose To review the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients diagnosed with Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS) and Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma (USS) at our institution and investigate their clinical outcomes and factors affecting prognosis. Methods We retrospectively collected demographic data, preoperative diagnostic methods and therapeutic management of patients treated for ESS and UUS between January 1995 and December 2019 at Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Spain. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were calculated. Results Sixty-three patients were included in the study, of which 51(81%) had a diagnosis of ESS and 12(19%) of UUS. Twenty patients (31.7%) were diagnosed after a previous non-oncologic surgery, and 12 of them (60%) suffered from tumor disruption. Cytoreductive procedures were needed in 29 patients (46%), and optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 80.9% of the patients. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (IQR = 0.99–14.31). Five-year overall survival was 57.6% (44.2–68.8) and was significantly better for low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) patients (p < 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival was 57.1% (42.8–69.1) and was also significantly higher in LG-ESS cohort (p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis histological type, age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and mitotic index were found significantly correlated with survival. For high-grade EES (HG-ESS) and USS patients adjuvant radiotherapy also correlated with improved survival. Conclusion Overall survival and disease-free survival are significantly better in patients with LG-ESS cohort. HG-ESS and UUS show similar survival outcomes. Age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and histological type were significantly correlated with survival in the global cohort, whilst adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with improved survival in HG-ESS and UUS patients (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/mortalidad , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/terapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(6): 1210-1219, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33210235

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients diagnosed with Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS) and Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma (USS) at our institution and investigate their clinical outcomes and factors affecting prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected demographic data, preoperative diagnostic methods and therapeutic management of patients treated for ESS and UUS between January 1995 and December 2019 at Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Spain. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included in the study, of which 51(81%) had a diagnosis of ESS and 12(19%) of UUS. Twenty patients (31.7%) were diagnosed after a previous non-oncologic surgery, and 12 of them (60%) suffered from tumor disruption. Cytoreductive procedures were needed in 29 patients (46%), and optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 80.9% of the patients. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (IQR = 0.99-14.31). Five-year overall survival was 57.6% (44.2-68.8) and was significantly better for low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) patients (p < 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival was 57.1% (42.8-69.1) and was also significantly higher in LG-ESS cohort (p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis histological type, age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and mitotic index were found significantly correlated with survival. For high-grade EES (HG-ESS) and USS patients adjuvant radiotherapy also correlated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Overall survival and disease-free survival are significantly better in patients with LG-ESS cohort. HG-ESS and UUS show similar survival outcomes. Age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and histological type were significantly correlated with survival in the global cohort, whilst adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with improved survival in HG-ESS and UUS patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/mortalidad , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA