RESUMEN
Temporary, sudden, shooting and recurrent unilateral facial pain in the supply area of one or more trigeminal nerve branches characterises trigeminal neuralgia. Innocuous stimuli trigger the pain, e.g. chewing, speaking or brushing teeth. In some patients, paroxysms superimpose on continuous pain. In aetiological terms, idiopathic, classic (due to neurovascular compression) and secondary trigeminal neuralgia (e.g. due to multiple sclerosis, brainstem ischaemia and space-occupying lesions) are defined. Many drugs may be efficacious, with carbamazepine being first-choice therapy. However, non-pharmacological and invasive procedures may also help. To reach the correct diagnosis and determine the best therapeutic measures, adequate pain characterisation and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential. We hereby present our experience of an interdisciplinary approach for the diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Asunto(s)
Carbamazepina , Neuralgia del Trigémino , Neuralgia del Trigémino/diagnóstico , Neuralgia del Trigémino/terapia , Neuralgia del Trigémino/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Carbamazepina/uso terapéutico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This study compared the biomechanical behavior of titanium, magnesium, and polylactic acid screws for two-screw osteosynthesis of mandibular condylar head fractures using finite element analysis. Von Mises stress distribution, fracture displacement, and fragment deformation were evaluated. Titanium screws performed the best in terms of carrying the highest load, resulting in the least fracture displacement and fragment deformation. Magnesium screws showed intermediate results, while PLA screws were found to be unsuitable with stress values exceeding their tensile strength. These findings suggest that magnesium alloys could be considered a suitable alternative to titanium screws in mandibular condylar head osteosynthesis.
RESUMEN
Titanium screws are commonly used for osteosynthesis of mandibular condylar head fractures. Evidence suggests that the insertion of three screws may result in better fracture stability. Two screws only, on the other hand, could reduce adverse effects, mainly bone resorption. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical differences in mandibular condylar head osteosynthesis with two versus three titanium screws using finite element analysis. A finite element model of the mandible with a right type P condylar head fracture fixed with two or three titanium screws was analyzed in ANSYS Mechanical. The geometry of the model assembly was constructed in ANSYS Spaceclaim. Biomechanical load boundary conditions were obtained from a validated musculoskeletal model in AnyBody Modeling System™. The preprocessing of the finite element model and mapping of the obtained boundary conditions was done in docq VIT. Fracture displacement, fragment deformation, von Mises stress distribution, and reaction forces within the screws were evaluated in ANSYS for three different loading scenarios. Finite element analysis showed similar results when comparing osteosynthesis with two versus three titanium screws for all three loading scenarios. Contralateral molar loading resulted in the highest stress on both the fracture and the screws with the maximum von Mises stress being found at the condylar neck. Stress concentration within the screws was found in the fracture gap and was higher in the lateral fragment. In all scenarios, maximum von Mises stress values were smaller when forces were distributed among three screws. However, stability was also adequate when two screws were used. Mandibular condylar head osteosynthesis with two titanium screws appears to provide sufficient fracture stability. Further clinical studies are needed to clarify the implications of these results.