RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In order to diagnose mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV) with gingival expression, clinical data must be compared with immunohistochemical data obtained using direct immunofluorescence (DIF). It is therefore essential to carry out a good quality mucosal biopsy for this vital additional test. To date, no study has been able to effectively guide clinicians in their choice of oral site for biopsy to guarantee the efficient contribution of DIF to diagnosis. We propose a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to clarify this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases and bibliographies of articles were searched in April 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of DIF + contribution to diagnosis according to the location of the oral site biopsied. RESULTS: 16 studies were included. Gingival biopsies showed a rate of DIF + 100% [97%-100%] p = 0.998 I2 = 0.0% with no heterogeneity for PV, and 90.2% [66.5%-100%] p < 0.001 I2 = 89.6% with high heterogeneity for MMP. For the other oral sites, this rate was 95.7% [87.4%- 100%] p = 0.011 I2 = 73.0% with moderate heterogeneity for PV, and 87.4% [70.1%- 98.7%] p < 0.001 I2 = 92.6% with high heterogeneity for MMP. In addition, meta-regression confirmed the significant association between the appearance of the biopsied mucosa and the rate of DIF + in MMP (p < 0.001), with no influence on residual heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The nature of the oral mucosa biopsied does not influence the rate of DIF + to diagnosis. The choice of biopsy site should only take into account the characteristics of the clinical picture and the benefit/risk balance of the surgical protocol. The sample must be taken in healthy aeras as close as possible of active lesions: on the gingiva if the MMP and PV are strictly gingival, on the alveolar mucosa if the whole gingiva is altered and on any healthy mucosa if a large number of oral sites are affected. CLINICAL TRIALS: CRD42023392345.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES), a rare malignancy, comprises whatever the age, 4-15% of all primary bone tumors. It represents 1% of all malignant tumors in children and is the fourth most common bone malignancy after myeloma, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. Case description: A 12-year-old boy came to the Oral Surgery Department of Bretonneau Hospital referred by his dentist with a rapidly evolving swelling in the left mandibula for 6 weeks, which was initially diagnosed as a facial cellulitis. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) showed a poorly defined, expansile, and osteolytic tumor on the left side of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic findings were in favor of an aggressive primitive bone tumor. A mandibular biopsy under general anesthesia was performed in the Department of Surgical Oncology at Institut Curie in Paris, revealing an ES. Conclusion: Mandibular ES can mimic dental infections when swelling is the main clinical manifestation, which can lead to a delayed diagnosis. A correlation between clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical with cytogenetics is needed to confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, smaller tumors have better survival.Dentists must therefore be aware of the clinical signs of ES in order to quickly refer patients to a specialized department. How to cite this article: Bellut N, Lutz CM, Lesnik M, et al. Ewing's Sarcoma of Mandible: A Case Report with Review of Literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(2):187-190.

Asunto(s)