RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate if two-handed mask airway is superior to one-handed mask airway during inhalational induction of anesthesia in children. METHODS: A randomized, two period, crossover study was performed on 60 children aged 1-8 years, with obstructive sleep apnea due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy, scheduled for adenotonsillectomy. Children were assigned to two study sequences and one control sequence of 20 subjects each. A control sequence was added to evaluate the effect of anesthetic depth. Sequence 1: One-handed followed by two-handed airway, 30 seconds each; Sequence 2: two-handed followed by one-handed airway, 30 seconds each and Sequence 3: two-handed airway, for 60 seconds. The work of breathing indices, phase angle, and labored breathing index were recorded using respiratory inductance plethysmography. Additional outcome measures were tidal volume, minute ventilation, and respiratory rate. A straight comparison and a crossover analysis was performed. RESULTS: The initial comparison revealed that one-handed airway had greater phase angle (mean diff. 17.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-33.68; P = .034), greater labored breathing index (mean diff. 0.56; 95% CI 0.16-1.04; P = .004),lower minute ventilation (mean diff. -1567; 95% CI -2695 to -5.4; P = .004),and lower tidal volume (mean diff. -39; 95% CI -2.7 to -5.4; P = .02) than two-handed airway. On crossover analysis, within-subject difference in the phase angle was greater during one-handed than two-handed airway (34.3; 95% CI 8.46-60.14; P = .01) as was labored breathing index (mean diff. 1.2; 95% CI 0.39-2.00; P < .0046).Minute ventilation was lower during one-handed than two-handed airway (mean diff. -3359; 95% CI -4363 to -2355, P < 0.0001) as was tidal volume(mean diff. -78; 95% CI -110.4 to -45.8; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In children with obstructive sleep apnea due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy, two-handed airway provides superior airway patency that was not influenced by the anesthetic depth.
Asunto(s)
Máscaras Laríngeas , Respiración Artificial , Adenoidectomía , Anestesia General , Niño , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Volumen de Ventilación PulmonarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Resistance to the passage of the endotracheal tube (ETT) is frequently encountered in children as it is advanced over the fiberoptic scope for placement into the trachea because it gets hung up at the laryngeal inlet. Literature in adults indicates that a 90° counterclockwise rotation (CCR) of the ETT before advancing results in smooth passage. We found no literature in children. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to study if a 90° counterclockwise rotation (CCR) of the ETT before advancement leads to smooth passage of the ETT into the larynx in children. METHODS: Following IRB approval, we performed this study in two parts: Part 1: An unblinded, observational, pilot study on 20 children scheduled for oral rehabilitation where we concurrently used a fiberoptic scope nasally and GlideScope orally. We visualized the ETT path and observed that 90° CCR allowed smooth passage without hang up. Part 2: A blinded and randomized study on 40 children to confirm if 90° CCR from the outset would improve passage of the ETT during nasal intubation with a fiberoptic scope in children. All children were divided into two groups: group S, ETT bevel facing left; group R, ETT bevel facing down. RESULTS: In Part 1, we observed that the ETT got hung up in 57% of children with standard bevel direction (facing left) and in 0% of children when prerotated. In Part 2, efficacy of prerotation was confirmed; the ETT got hung up in 50% of children in group S but in only 10.5% of children in group R. CONCLUSION: A change in ETT tip orientation from bevel facing left to facing down by 90° CCR, leads to a significantly higher first-attempt success rate by nasal approach in children. We believe the ETT should be rotated before insertion into the nostril to ensure that full 90° CCR of the tip has been accomplished.