RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Therapies are needed to address worsening congestion, without hospitalization, in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: This pilot study assessed outcomes of a novel subcutaneous (SC) furosemide formulation compared to usual care in outpatients with worsening congestion. METHODS: Participants with chronic HF and worsening congestion were randomized open-label 2:1 to SC furosemide compared to usual care (UC). Decongestion was estimated by tracking body weight. The primary endpoint was a win ratio of a 30-day hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death, HF events, and change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Secondary endpoints included dyspnea severity, functional capacity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants were randomized to SC furosemide and 17 to UC. SC furosemide caused greater reduction in body weight: between-group difference in least square mean change was -2.02 kg at day 3 (95% CI: -3.9 to -0.14; P = 0.035). SC furosemide-to-UC win ratio was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.48-2.50; P = 0.806). Significant between-group least square mean differences favoring SC furosemide occurred in 7-point dyspnea score (P = 0.017) and 6-minute walk test (P = 0.032), with trend in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 Overall Summary Score of 9.15 (95% CI: 1.95-20.3; P = 0.106). The most common related adverse event with SC furosemide was mild infusion site pain (11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: SC furosemide augmented weight loss in patients with HF and worsening congestion. The composite primary endpoint was not statistically significant in this pilot investigation. However, findings of improved dyspnea scores and functional capacity, with favorable trend in KCCQ-12 score, warrant additional investigation to further document the clinical value of SC furosemide as an alternative to hospitalization (AT HOME-HF [Avoiding Treatment in the Hospital With Furoscix for the Management of Congestion in Heart Failure-A Pilot Study]; NCT04593823).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The combination of growing antimicrobial resistance with a dry pipeline has resulted in infections that can no longer be treated. Specific reasons have led to companies' exit from the antibacterial space, however recent incentives are spurring interest to reinvigorate the pipeline. Areas covered: This article summarizes the available information on the discovery, developmental, and regulatory challenges in antibacterial development that have led to disinterest in the space, as well as ongoing incentives such as public-private partnerships and streamlined pathways to mend these challenges and bring new antibiotics to patients in need. Expert commentary: Clinicians should not only understand the reasons for the decline in antibiotic development that have resulted in the dry pipeline, but also the ongoing initiatives in place to build an appropriate supply. Doing so will result in greater appreciation and prudent use of these life-saving drugs when they become available.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Descubrimiento de Drogas/métodos , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Drogas en Investigación/economía , Investigación Farmacéutica/economía , Antibacterianos/síntesis química , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Aprobación de Drogas/métodos , Descubrimiento de Drogas/economía , Industria Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Drogas en Investigación/síntesis química , Drogas en Investigación/farmacocinética , Humanos , Investigación Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Growing antimicrobial resistance and a dwindling antibiotic pipeline have resulted in an emerging postantibiotic era, as patients are now dying from bacterial infections that were once treatable. The fast-paced "Golden Age" of antibiotic development that started in the 1940s has lost momentum; from the 1980s to the early 2000s, there was a 90% decline in the approval of new antibiotics as well as the discovery of few new novel classes. Many companies have shifted away from development due to scientific, regulatory, and economic hurdles that proved antibiotic development to be less attractive compared with more lucrative therapeutic areas. National and global efforts are focusing attention toward potential solutions for reinvigorating the antibiotic pipeline and include "push" incentives such as public-private partnerships and "pull" incentives such as reimbursement reform and market exclusivity. Hybrid models of incentives, global coordination among stakeholders, and the appropriate balance of antibiotic pricing, volume of drug used, and proper antimicrobial stewardship are key to maximizing efforts toward drug development to ensure access to patients in need of these therapies.