Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 44(10): 1861-70, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27359085

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The 2009-2010 influenza A (H1N1pdm09) pandemic caused substantial morbidity and mortality among young patients; however, mortality estimates have been confounded by regional differences in eligibility criteria and inclusion of selected populations. In 2013-2014, H1N1pdm09 became North America's dominant seasonal influenza strain. Our objective was to compare the baseline characteristics, resources, and treatments with outcomes among critically ill patients with influenza A (H1N1pdm09) in Mexican and Canadian hospitals in 2014 using consistent eligibility criteria. DESIGN: Observational study and a survey of available healthcare setting resources. SETTING: Twenty-one hospitals, 13 in Mexico and eight in Canada. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients with confirmed H1N1pdm09 during 2013-2014 influenza season. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measures were 90-day mortality and independent predictors of mortality. Among 165 adult patients with H1N1pdm09-related critical illness between September 2013 and March 2014, mean age was 48.3 years, 64% were males, and nearly all influenza was community acquired. Patients were severely hypoxic (median PaO2-to-FIO2 ratio, 83 mm Hg), 97% received mechanical ventilation, with mean positive end-expiratory pressure of 14 cm H2O at the onset of critical illness and 26.7% received rescue oxygenation therapy with prone ventilation, extracorporeal life support, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, or inhaled nitric oxide. At 90 days, mortality was 34.6% (13.9% in Canada vs 50.5% in Mexico, p < 0.0001). Independent predictors of mortality included lower presenting PaO2-to-FIO2 ratio (odds ratio, 0.89 per 10-point increase [95% CI, 0.80-0.99]), age (odds ratio, 1.49 per 10 yr increment [95% CI, 1.10-2.02]), and requiring critical care in Mexico (odds ratio, 7.76 [95% CI, 2.02-27.35]). ICUs in Canada generally had more beds, ventilators, healthcare personnel, and rescue oxygenation therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza A (H1N1pdm09)-related critical illness still predominantly affects relatively young to middle-aged patients and is associated with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The local critical care system and available resources may be influential determinants of patient outcome.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/fisiopatología , Gripe Humana/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Corticoesteroides/economía , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/economía , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Gripe Humana/economía , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial/economía , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA