RESUMEN
As the field of hospital medicine expands, internal medicine residency programs can play a role in preparing future hospitalists. To date, little is known of the prevalence and characteristics of hospitalist-focused resident rotations. We surveyed the largest 100 Internal Medicine Residency Programs to better understand the prevalence, objectives, and structure of hospitalist-focused rotations in the United States. Residency leaders from 82 programs responded (82%). The prevalence of hospitalist-focused rotations was 50% (41/82) with an additional 9 programs (11%) planning to start one. Of these 41 rotations, 85% were elective rotations and 15% were mandatory rotations. Rotations involved clinical responsibilities, and most programs incorporated nonclinical curricular activities such as teaching, research, and work on quality improvement and patient safety. Respondents noted that their programs promoted autonomy, mentorship, and "real-world" hospitalist experience. Hospitalist-focused rotations may supplement traditional inpatient rotations and teach skills that facilitate the transition from residency to a career in hospital medicine.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Medicina Hospitalar/educación , Médicos Hospitalarios , Internado y Residencia , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Hospitalar/organización & administración , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Teléfono Inteligente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) is associated with increased rates of neuropsychiatric disease and irritable bowel syndrome, and patients may exhibit visceral hypersensitivity. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with CD have increased sedation requirements during endoscopic procedures. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified CD patients undergoing either a colonoscopy or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), but not a dual procedure. CD patients were matched with control patients according to age, gender and endoscopist. For sedation requirements we defined "high" as falling outside of the 75th percentile of the entire cohort. RESULTS: In the colonoscopy analysis we identified 113 CD patients and 278 controls. In the CD group, 29 individuals (26%) required high amounts of both opioids and midazolam, as compared to 46 (17%) controls (P = 0.05). Differences were similar when considering only opioids (P = 0.06) and midazolam (P = 0.06). In the EGD analysis we identified 314 CD patients and 314 controls who met the inclusion criteria. Among the CD patients, 70 (22%) required high amounts of both opioids and midazolam compared to 51 (16%) controls (P = 0.05). Differences were similar when considering only opioids (P = 0.06) and midazolam (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CD require higher doses of sedation during upper and lower endoscopy compared to age and gender-matched controls. Putative explanations, such as visceral hypersensitivity, chronic opioid/anxiolytic use, or underlying neuropsychiatric illness, should be evaluated prospectively.