RESUMEN

Firearm-related injuries in the USA are increasing, with over 105,000 cases annually. Gunshot wounds (GSWs), especially those involving retained bullets, present complex challenges due to bullet trajectories and embolization risks. This study reviews two cases of bullet emboli, focusing on bullet localization strategies and timing of removal. Imaging techniques such as chest X-ray, CT scan, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and transesophageal echocardiogram were employed for localization. In Case 1, a stable patient with a left-back GSW had a bullet embolism from the inferior vena cava to the right ventricle, necessitating prompt removal. In Case 2, an unstable patient with thoracoabdominal GSWs experienced a delayed embolism to the aortic root, requiring multiple surgeries. Effective management of retained bullets involves diverse imaging and timely surgical intervention, especially for stable patients, emphasizing individualized and proactive strategies to enhance outcomes in bullet embolization cases.

RESUMEN

High-energy, blunt force trauma to the abdomen results in an abdominal wall injury (AWI) in up to 9% of patients. In 1% of blunt abdominal trauma, they result in a traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH). Optimal management of these injuries remains unclear. Because they are the result of a high-energy mechanism, concomitant serious abdominal organ injuries are common. This has prompted some to advocate that the presence of a TAWH on physical exam mandates exploratory laparotomy. However, delayed repairs have better outcomes and nontherapeutic celiotomy should be avoided. Similarly debated is the expanding use of minimally invasive techniques and the use of mesh for hernia repairs. Overall, the presence of a TAWH is likely not an absolute indication for emergency surgery. Rather, it is an indicator of high-energy impact and associated with a high rate of visceral injury. These patients require a close observation for clinical decline and development of typical indicators for laparotomy.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The critical blood shortage in January 2022 threatened the availability of blood. Utility of transfusion per unit was reported in a previous study, revealing patients receiving balanced transfusion are more likely to die after 16 units of packed red blood cells. We aimed to validate this study using a larger database. METHODS: Retrospective analysis utilizing the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program was performed. Trauma patients aged ≥16 receiving transfusion within 4 hours of arrival were included and excluded if they died in the emergency department, received <2 units of packed red blood cells, did not receive fresh frozen plasma, or were missing data. Primary outcome was mortality. Subgroups were balanced transfusion if receiving ≤2:1 ratio of packed red blood cells:fresh frozen plasma, and unbalanced transfusion if >2:1 ratio. RESULTS: A total of 17,047 patients were evaluated with 28% mortality (4,822/17,408). Multivariable logistic regression identified advancing age (odds ratio 1.03 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04), higher ISS (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04), and lower GCS (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.82-0.83) as risk factors for mortality. Protective factors were balanced transfusion (odds ratio 0.81 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93), male sex (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.99), and blunt mechanism (odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.81). At 11 units of packed red blood cells, balanced transfusion patients were more likely to die (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.98). Balanced transfusion patients survived at a higher rate for each unit of packed red blood cells, between 6 and 23 units of packed red blood cells. CONCLUSION: Mortality increases with each unit of packed red blood cell transfused. At 11 units of packed red blood cells, mortality is the more likely outcome. Balanced transfusion improves the chance of survival through 23 units of packed red blood cells.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Balanced transfusion is lifesaving for hemorrhagic shock. The American Red Cross critical blood shortage in 2022 threatened the immediate availability of blood. To eliminate waste, we reviewed the utility of transfusions per unit to define expected mortality at various levels of balanced transfusion. METHODS: A retrospective study of 296 patients receiving massive transfusion on presentation at a level 1 trauma center was performed from January 2018 to December 2021. Units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets received in the first 4 hours were recorded. Patients were excluded if they died in the emergency department, died on arrival, received <2 U PRBCs or FFP, or received PRBC/FFP >2:1. Primary outcomes were mortality and odds of survival to discharge. Subgroups were defined as transfused if receiving 2 to 9 U PRBCs, massive transfusion for 10 to 19 U PRBCs, and ultramassive transfusion for ≥20 U PRBCs. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included (median age, 32 years; median Injury Severity Score, 25; 67% with penetrating mechanism). Mortality was 29% (61 of 207 patients). Odds of survival is equal to odds of mortality at 11 U PRBCs (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.79). Beyond 16 U PRBCs, odds of mortality exceed survival (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.82). Survival approaches zero >36 U PRBCs (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.00-0.56). Subgroup mortality rates increased with unit transfused (16% transfused vs. 36% massive transfusion, p = 0.003; 36% massive transfusion vs. 67% ultramassive transfusion, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Mortality increases with each unit balanced transfusion. Surgeons should view efforts heroic beyond 16 U PRBCs/4 hours and near futile beyond 36 U PRBCs/4 hours. While extreme outliers can survive, consider cessation of resuscitation beyond 36 U PRBCs. This is especially true if hemostasis has not been achieved or blood supplies are limited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level IV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A 20-year-old woman with previous COVID-19 diagnosis presented with abdominal pain and colitis on CT scan. She was admitted in septic shock, with etiology of colitis unclear. After resuscitation, antibiotics, and steroids, she clinically deteriorated. Worsening Clostridioides difficile infection was most likely and she was taken to the operating room. Intraoperatively, only a segment of transverse colon appeared abnormal on gross and endoscopic evaluation. Total colectomy was deferred in favor of segmental resection. Given her unusual disease pattern and recent COVID-19 infection, diagnosis of MIS-C was considered. Steroids were continued and treatment broadened to include heparin and IVIG. The patient returned to the operating room for planned reexploration, endoscopy, and end colostomy. On hospital day three, the patient had an acute mental status change. Computed tomography demonstrated acute cerebral edema with brainstem herniation. The family chose comfort-care measures. Final pathology from the transverse colon demonstrated COVID-19-associated vasculitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

One hundred and seven group B Streptococcus (GBS) isolates and 344 group A Streptococcus (GAS) isolates were collected between 2005 and 2009 from 2 area hospitals and studied for resistance to erythromycin (ERY) and clindamycin (CLI) and the presence of the erm(T) macrolide resistance gene. The erm(T) gene was found in 5 (8%) of 61 erythromycin nonsusceptible GBS isolates and in 22 (55%) of 40 erythromycin nonsusceptible GAS isolates. The erm(T) gene in all 27 GBS/GAS erm(T) gene-positive isolates was located on a plasmid. Three erm(T) gene-positive plasmids were DNA sequenced. Two plasmids (1 each from GBS and GAS isolates) were both 4967 bp in size, contained the erm(T) gene, and differed by only 2 base pairs, suggesting interspecies horizontal transfer of the erm(T) gene containing plasmid. The third (GBS) plasmid was 6825 bp in size and contained GBSi1, a group II bacterial intron, as well as the erm(T) gene. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of all 27 erm(T) gene containing isolates and a selection of erm(T) gene-negative isolates indicated possible clonal expansion among erm(T) gene containing GAS isolates, but not among the 5 erm(T) gene-positive GBS isolates.

Asunto(s)