RESUMEN
This study examines the reasons for the success of Multiple Oral Re-reading (MOR; Moyer, 1979), a non-invasive, easily administered alexia treatment that has been reported in the literature and is currently in clinical use. The treatment consists of reading text passages aloud multiple times a day. Findings that MOR improves reading speed on practised as well as novel text have been inconsistent, making MOR's role in the rehabilitation of alexia unclear. We hypothesised that MOR's treatment mechanism works through repetition of high frequency words (i.e., bottom-up processing). We designed and controlled our text passages to test the hypothesis that participants would not improve on all novel text but would improve on text that includes a critical mass of the words contained in the passages they were re-reading. We further hypothesised that the improvement would be at the level of their specific alexic deficit. We tested four participants with phonological alexia and two with pure alexia during 8 weeks of MOR treatment. Contrary to the conclusions of previous studies, our results indicate that improvements in top-down processing cannot explain generalisation in MOR and that much of the improvement in reading is through repetition of the practised words. However, most patients also showed improvement when specific phrases were re-used in novel passages, indicating that practice of difficult words in context may be crucial to reading improvement.
Asunto(s)
Dislexia/fisiopatología , Dislexia/rehabilitación , Lingüística , Procesos Mentales/fisiología , Lectura , Enseñanza/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Humanos , Pruebas del Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients with phonological alexia (difficulty reading pseudowords) frequently have concomitant difficulty reading functor words and verbs compared with concrete nouns. The current study compares two techniques for helping two patients with phonological alexia regain the ability to read functors and verbs. One technique follows the approach of reorganization of function, while the other relies on the stimulation approach. Study 1, employing a reorganization approach, resulted in both patients increasing their reading accuracy from approximately 10 to 90% or greater. Study 2, using a stimulation approach, resulted in significant improvement, however neither patient was able to achieve accuracy greater than 59%. Study 3 reverted back to the reorganization approach using the same words from Study 2. Both patients demonstrated significant success, achieving 90% or greater accuracy. Whereas the reorganization approach meets with far greater success than the stimulation approach, both approaches can be seen as instances of paired associate learning. An explanation of the advantage of the reorganization approach is developed which focuses on the nature of the pairings in the paired associate learning paradigm: it is proposed that pairings within the same level of representation are easier to learn than pairings that cut across levels of representation.
Asunto(s)
Dislexia/terapia , Lectura , Semántica , Anciano , Dislexia/fisiopatología , Dislexia/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Procesos Mentales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis y Desempeño de TareasRESUMEN
Following the notion that patients with pure alexia have access to two distinct reading strategies-letter-by-letter reading and semantic reading-a training program was devised to facilitate reading via semantics in a patient with pure alexia. Training utilized brief stimulus presentations and required category judgments rather than explicit word identification. The training was successful for trained words, but generalized poorly to untrained words. Additional studies involving oral reading of nouns and of functors also resulted in improved reading of trained words. Pseudowords could not be trained to criterion. The results suggest that improved reading can be achieved in pure alexia by pairing rapidly presented words with feedback. Focusing on semantic processing is not essential to this process. It is proposed that the training strengthens connections between the output of visual processing and preexisting orthographic representations.