Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(11): 1563-1568, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31038373

RESUMEN

Background: In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published guidance on gestational weight gain (GWG) modified by body mass index (BMI). GWG outside of IOM recommendations negatively affects birth outcomes and child health. This study examined the relationship between BMI, GWG, birth complications, and birth outcomes in a rural, non-Hispanic white population over 10 years. Materials and Methods: We examined maternal BMI, GWG, birth weight, birth complications, and Apgar score in 18,217 term singleton births from medical records at Geisinger, PA from 2006 to 2015. Primary outcomes were GWG, delivery mode, Apgar score, and infant birth weight. Results: A majority of women (74.2%) had GWG outside of recommendations. Prevalence of cesarean delivery was highest for women with GWG above recommendations regardless of BMI. One in five neonates of obese women with GWG above recommendations had Apgar scores below eight. Although most births were normal for gestational age (88%), underweight women who gained below recommendations had the highest percentage of small for gestational age (SGA) births (10.4%) and obese women who gained above recommendations had the highest percentage of large for gestational age (LGA) births (22.2%). Among women with BMIs above 35 kg/m2 and GWG within recommendations, 18.9% of births were LGA. Conclusions: Most pregnant women are not gaining weight within recommendations. GWG outside of IOM recommendations resulted in poorer birth outcomes, particularly in underweight and obese women. Underweight women with GWG below recommendations are at increased risk for SGA neonates. We suggest reducing GWG recommendations for women above 35 kg/m2 to decrease LGA births and pregnancy complications.


Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Índice de Masa Corporal , Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Obesidad/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Pennsylvania , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural , Nacimiento a Término , Delgadez/epidemiología
2.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(10): 1399-1406, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31038383

RESUMEN

Background: Inappropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) is prevalent in the United States. About 20% of women gain below Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations; more than 50% gain above. GWG outside of recommendations is linked to poor birth outcomes and health issues for mother and baby. Counseling by health care providers is important to encourage appropriate GWG. Methods: Assess patient recall of counseling regarding GWG, provider knowledge, and opinions about IOM GWG guidance, and GWG outcomes in a subset of women. Cross-sectional, with questionnaires distributed by 8 medical centers across the United States to patients. Questionnaires were distributed to providers and data on maternal body mass index (BMI) and GWG collected at seven sites. Results: A total of 1,157 women returned questionnaires (1,820 maximum possible). A majority at all sites reported a provider discussed their expected GWG with them. Close to half reported that a provider had discussed potential harms from inappropriate GWG. Most of the women (71.2%) considered their obstetrician to be a helpful resource for GWG advice. Most providers (87.5%) reported they were aware of IOM guidelines. As many providers disagreed (18.8%) as agreed (20.8%) that they were successful helping their patients attain appropriate GWG (58.3% were neutral). Physician self-reported confidence was associated with whether they believed they could help their patients avoid excessive GWG. The most common outcome was GWG above recommendations (51.4%). Overweight and obese women were more likely to gain above recommendations. Providers underestimated the proportion of their patients that gained below IOM recommendations (8.5% vs. 18.6%). Conclusions: Providers are aware of the dangers of excessive GWG and a majority of patients report receiving counseling. Providers appear more cognizant of excessive GWG and underestimate inadequate GWG. Most women are not achieving an appropriate GWG, with overweight and obese women especially likely to gain above recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Atención Prenatal , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Consejo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 239, 2018 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29914428

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published guidance on gestational weight gain (GWG) modified by maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). Estimates indicate that less than half of US pregnant women have GWG within recommendations. This study examined GWG from before (2006-2009) and after (2010-2015) the release of the IOM guidance in a rural, non-Hispanic white population to assess the proportion of women with GWG outside of IOM guidance, whether GWG became more likely to be within IOM guidance after 2010, and identify potential maternal factors associated with GWG outside of recommendations. METHODS: We examined GWG in 18,217 term singleton births between 2006 and 2015 in which maternal pre-pregnancy BMI could be calculated from electronic medical records at Geisinger, PA, and a subset of 12,912 births in which weekly GWG in the third trimester could be calculated. The primary outcome was whether GWG was below, within, or above recommendations based on maternal BMI. The relationships between GWG, maternal BMI, parity, age at conception, gestation length, and maternal blood pressure were examined. RESULTS: GWG declined with increasing maternal BMI, however, more than 50% of overweight and obese women gained above IOM recommendations. About one of five women gained below recommendations (21.3%) with underweight women the most likely to gain below recommendations (33.0%). The proportion of births with usable data increased after 2010, driven by a higher probability of recording maternal weight. However, the proportion of women who gained below, within or above recommendations did not change over the ten years. GWG above recommendations was associated with higher maternal BMI, lower parity, and longer gestation. GWG below recommendations was associated with lower maternal BMI, higher parity, shorter gestation, and younger age at conception. Maternal blood pressure was higher for GWG outside recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the publication of IOM recommendations in 2009 and an apparent increase in tracking maternal weight after 2010, GWG in this population did not change between 2006 and 2015. A majority of overweight and obese women gained above recommendations. GWG below recommendations continues to occur, and is prevalent among underweight women.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Madres , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA