RESUMEN
The World Psychiatric Association (WPA) Task Force and a small group previously convened by the WPA publications committee initiated three activities between 2006-2008 that aimed to respond to the need for greater support for psychiatry journals in LAMI countries. In a joint venture with participants from the Global Mental Health Movement the Task Force editors from LAMI countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America were contacted to identify potential journals to target for indexation (Medline and ISI). The committee analyzed the editors' applications on the following criteria: a) geographical representativeness; b) affiliation to a professional mental health society; c) regular publication of at least 4 issues per year over the past few years; d) comprehensive national and international editorial boards; e) publication of original articles, or at least abstracts, in English; f) some level of current indexation; g) evidence of a good balance between original and review articles in publications; and h) a friendly access website. The committee received 26 applications (11 from Latin America, 7 from Central Europe, 4 from Asia and 4 from Africa), and selected 8 journals, 2 from each geographical area, on the basis of the overall scores obtained for the items mentioned, to participate in an editors meeting held in Prague in September 2008. The aims of the committee are twofold: a) to concentrate support for those selected journals; and b) to assist all LAMI mental health editors in improving the quality of their journals and fulfilling the requirements for full indexation. This report summarizes the procedures conducted by the committee, the assessment of the current non-indexed journals, and offers suggestions for further action.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Difusión de Innovaciones , Salud Global , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Predicción , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/tendencias , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Edición/tendencias , Investigación/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Obsessions can occur in many psychiatric disorders or they may constitute the entire illness, which is then referred to as an obsessional state (Rees, 1993). The relationship of obsessive compulsive symptoms (OCS) to different psychiatric disorders is still controversial. This work was undertaken to study the co-occurrence and phenomenology of OCS with other psychiatric disorders. We examined a sample of 372 psychiatric outpatients using the arabic version of Yale Brown obsessive-compulsive symptom (Y-BOCS) checklist and compared them with a control group composed of 308 non-psychiatric subjects. Subjects were additionally assessed by means of the obsession symptom section of the PSE (10th) edition for trait rating, the arabic version of the Eysenck rigidity scale and the arabic version of the religious orientation scale. OCS were found to be significantly higher in the different psychiatric categories than in the non-psychiatric categories; 83% of patients with neurotic, stress related and somatoform disorders, 51% of patients with mood disorders and 47% of patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders were found to have OCS in their symptomatology. Furthermore, the data suggest that OCS in psychiatric patients have a distinct phenomenology from that in non-psychiatric subjects. The results did not however reveal a relationship between OCS and either rigidity or religious orientation.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/epidemiología , Atención Ambulatoria , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Egipto/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Determinación de la PersonalidadRESUMEN
Neurosis and personality disorder (PD) are two of the most used but least clarified and understood terms in psychiatry. The separation of PD by the American Psychiatric Association in DSM-III and -IV as a discrete axis of classification has been a major advance in psychiatric nosology. Also with the advent of DSM-III and its multiaxial system, it was recognized that both PD and clinical syndromes can coexist, and in some cases this coexistence may have implications on treatment response and prognosis. This study was performed on 200 neurotic patients in an attempt to investigate possible correlations between various neurotic subcategories and personality types. Our results confirm that PD and personality abnormality are significantly higher in neurotic patients than in controls and need to be considered in diagnostic assessment. Some comorbidity was shown between borderline PD and somatoform disorder; compulsive PD and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD); and avoidant PD and phobia. However, our data failed to show a correlation between the presence of an additional PD and particular neurotic symptomatology. It seems that the association between neurotic disorders and PD should not be taken to indicate a direct causative relationship. It is likely that personality is just one of the predisposing factors that influence the individual response to psychological trauma and determine the form of neurosis. The most prevalent PD was found to be PD NOS, followed by borderline, compulsive, avoidant, and finally histrionic PDs. The term, multiple PD, should be given substance to characterize the diagnosis as a disorder, rather than leaving it at its current status of what seems to be a nondistinct clinical picture. Extensive research has to be undertaken in an attempt to decide which specific PDs most deserve to be included in the official nomenclature.