RESUMEN
The generation of synthetic patient data that reflect the statistical properties of real data plays a fundamental role in today's world because of its potential to (i) be enable proprietary data access for statistical and research purposes and (ii) increase available data (e.g., in low-density regions-i.e., for patients with under-represented characteristics). Generative methods employ a family of solutions for generating synthetic data. The objective of this research is to benchmark numerous state-of-the-art deep-learning generative methods across different scenarios and clinical datasets comprising patient covariates and several pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic endpoints. We did this by implementing various probabilistic models aimed at generating synthetic data, such as the Multi-layer Perceptron Conditioning Generative Adversarial Neural Network (MLP cGAN), Time-series Generative Adversarial Networks (TimeGAN), and a more traditional approach like Probabilistic Autoregressive (PAR). We evaluated their performance by calculating discriminative and predictive scores. Furthermore, we conducted comparisons between the distributions of real and synthetic data using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Chi-square statistical tests, focusing respectively on covariate and output variables of the models. Lastly, we employed pharmacometrics-related metric to enhance interpretation of our results specific to our investigated scenarios. Results indicate that multi-layer perceptron-based conditional generative adversarial networks (MLP cGAN) exhibit the best overall performance for most of the considered metrics. This work highlights the opportunities to employ synthetic data generation in the field of clinical pharmacology for augmentation and sharing of proprietary data across institutions.
RESUMEN
The advent of machine learning has led to innovative approaches in dealing with clinical data. Among these, Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs), hybrid models merging mechanistic with deep learning models have shown promise in accurately modeling continuous dynamical systems. Although initial applications of Neural ODEs in the field of model-informed drug development and clinical pharmacology are becoming evident, applying these models to actual clinical trial datasets-characterized by sparse and irregularly timed measurements-poses several challenges. Traditional models often have limitations with sparse data, highlighting the urgent need to address this issue, potentially through the use of assumptions. This review examines the fundamentals of Neural ODEs, their ability to handle sparse and irregular data, and their applications in model-informed drug development.