Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The closing plenary of the colloquium was an occasion for exchange between the four panelists and the participants. The panelists included Luc Berghmans, a doctor and director of the regional health observatory of Hainaut, Belgium; Louise Bouchard, a sociologist and professor in the Sociology and Anthropology Department, University of Ottawa, Canada; Michel O'Neill, a sociologist and professor at the Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada; and Philippe Lorenzo, director general of IREPS, the regional bureau for health education and promotion of Picardie in Amiens, France. Louise Potvin, who moderated the plenary, provides the summary that follows. During the colloquium, three main questions were debated: 1. At what point should health be placed at the forefront of local actions, if we wish to promote the values of equity? 2. How should actions at the local, regional, national and global levels be organized and articulated? Who are the partners, and what forms of governance need to be put into place? 3. What are the parameters needed in order to define the roles, tasks and competencies of the implementers of local and regional health programs, the architects of change? Each panelist had to respond to two out of the three questions. We report on the answers that panelists gave to these questions. As it is impossible to verify the exactitude of information given by audience members in support of their viewpoints, only the content of the remarks is given, without mentioning the examples that were provided.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A discussion concerning the relevance of universal newborn hearing screening has been conducted in France since the end of the 1990s. As a contribution to the choice of strategy to be implemented, we evaluated and compared the results of this screening and its impact on the parent-infant relationship as a function of the time at which screening was performed: during the infant's stay in the maternity unit, in the first strategy (strategy 1), or 2 months after birth, in the second strategy (strategy 2). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Five thousand seven hundred and ninety infants participated in the study: 3202 were included in the first strategy and 2588 were included in the second strategy. Within this population, 143 mother-infant pairs were submitted to psychological assessment. We compared the number of infants screened, the number of first positive tests, the number of false-positive tests and the number of infants not reviewed after screening. Adverse effects on the parent-infant relationship were evaluated in terms of maternal anxiety and the quality of early interactions. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in favor of newborn screening was demonstrated for the number of infants screened: 95.72% for the first strategy [95.0%; 96.4%], 64.18% for the second strategy [62.3%; 66.0%]; the number of first positive tests: 1.11% during newborn screening [0.7%; 1.5%], 3.13% in the second strategy [2.3%; 4.0%]; the number of false-positive tests: 0.29% in the first strategy [0.10%; 0.49%] and 2.65% in the second strategy [1.88%; 3.42%]; and the number of infants not reviewed after screening: 8.8% during newborn screening [0.0%; 18.4%] and 38.5% in the second strategy [25.2%; 51.7%]. Analysis of the results of the psychological assessment showed that screening per se did not have any impact on maternal anxiety or on the quality of early interactions, regardless of the screening strategy used. However, the result of the test had a significant impact. Announcement of a positive result increased maternal anxiety and induced a deterioration of the mother's psychological state which affected the quality of early interactions. As the number of positive results is significantly lower in newborn hearing screening, there are consequently fewer psychological side effects with this strategy than with the second strategy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that universal newborn hearing screening is the most efficient strategy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The first two international conferences on local and regional health programmes held in Amiens and Quebec have paved the road for a new public health paradigm. The conferences have served to share experiences from the field to re-think practice and create bridges between health promotion, prevention, care and integration at both the action and decision levels, and amongst diverse actors from the field. The challenges have been put forth, in Amiens in 2001 and in Quebec three years later. The next step is to pursue and enrich these exchanges at the international level reinforcing the Francophone position by capitalising on approaches and tools, and mobilising new partners. The next rendezvous for this on-going adventure is set for the third conference.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)