RESUMEN

Background: Dalbavancin (DAL) may obviate concerns regarding misuse of IV access in persons who use drugs (PWUD) completing treatment for infections in an outpatient setting. However, hesitancy to adopt its use exists due to the cost-prohibitive nature of DAL and perceived issues with insurance reimbursement. Our study looks to determine the financial impact of DAL use in actual, measured cost, and health care utilization, data as well as the effect on treatment completion rates. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort comparing cost information and treatment completion rates of patients who received DAL to a random sample of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia prior to the institutional availability of DAL. Results: From June 2020 to January 2022, 29 PWUD received DAL. Dalbavancin use resulted in the completion of intended duration in 19 patients (66%) compared with 11 (55%) without DAL. The contribution margin with DAL use was $7180 compared with $6655 without; this was not statistically significant (P = 0.47). Conclusion: Dalbavancin use in PWUD may increase treatment completion, with no statistically significant difference in contribution margins.

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: While the gold standard for calculating AUC involves two steady-state concentrations, online calculators can empirically estimate AUC and other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. In patients with potentially altered PK, such as persons who inject drugs (PWID), the reliability of these predictions is unclear. Our objectives were to characterize the PK of vancomycin in PWID with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) and to assess the impact of these PK parameters on dosing regimens when compared to regimens generated by an online calculator. METHODS: This descriptive pilot study included a retrospective chart review of 48 inpatient PWID with MRSA BSI from 30 April 2018 through 31 August 2020. Demographic and clinical data along with vancomycin dosing and serum concentrations were collected. Patient-specific PK parameters were used to calculate the AUC of each empiric regimen compared with the originally predicted AUC. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The study population had a median volume of distribution of 0.74 L/kg, clearance of 0.081 L/kg/h, elimination rate constant of 0.110/h and half-life of 6.3 h. The online calculator empirically predicted 6 subtherapeutic and 42 appropriate AUC values with its recommended empiric dosing regimens. Using the actual patient-specific PK parameters, the empiric vancomycin regimens actually resulted in 21 (43.75%) underexposures, 24 (50%) appropriate exposures and 3 (6.25%) overexposures. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: In PWID, empiric vancomycin dosing strategies suggested by an online calculator frequently resulted in lower-than-predicted vancomycin exposures. These findings suggest that PWID with MRSA BSI may require higher and/or more frequent vancomycin doses than those empirically recommended by the population-based methods of an online calculator.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic used off-label to treat serious gram-positive infections, including infections secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Dalbavancin has unique pharmacokinetic parameters and has a role in therapy for treating vulnerable patients, including intravenous drug users, who have challenges complying with typical care plans for serious infections. While there is data indicating successful clinical use of dalbavancin in patients with history of intravenous drug use as well as pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data assessing dalbavancin in obesity, there is a lack of information regarding clinical effects of dalbavancin in patients with extreme obesity, especially in patients with concomitant drug use. This case report describes a 40-year-old morbidly obese female actively using intravenous drugs who developed prolonged MRSA bacteremia without a recognizable focus. Despite partial treatment with dalbavancin, the patient developed osteomyelitis and discitis of the spine with associated epidural phlegmon, likely complications of the MRSA bacteremia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the pharmacokinetics of flucytosine in a critically ill patient undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) treated for cryptococcal meningitis. SUMMARY: A 20-year-old female weighing 93.4 kg with a body mass index of 34.3 kg/m2 with a past medical history of systemic lupus erythematous with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis (class IV) was admitted to the hospital after several months of worsening dyspnea, fatigue, myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea. The patient developed worsening renal function and volume overload requiring CVVHDF on hospital day 7. She was diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis on hospital day 8, and flucytosine 2,500 mg enterally every 12 hours and liposomal amphotericin B 500 mg intravenously every 24 hours were initiated. Flucytosine serum concentrations were collected on day 4 of therapy, and pharmacokinetics were performed on 2 sequential levels. Pharmacokinetic calculations displayed an elimination rate constant of 0.0338 h-1, a volume of distribution between 0.42 and 0.43 L/kg, a half-life of 20.5 hours, and a total drug clearance between 1.32 and 1.36 L/h while on CVVHDF. The nonsequential levels displayed good correlation, and no further monitoring or dosage adjustment was required. The patient completed therapy, with clinical resolution of her infection, and no toxicities due to flucytosine were noted. CONCLUSION: Flucytosine dosed at 25 mg/kg of actual body weight every 12 hours during CVVHDF conferred therapeutic levels with no appreciable toxicities. Because of its narrow therapeutic index and risk of toxicity, additional pharmacokinetic studies are needed to determine optimal drug dosing of this medication in patients requiring renal replacement therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to describe the successful use of parenteral olanzapine intravenously (IV) in a critically ill patient with severe agitated delirium. Summary: A 70-year-old man was admitted to the medical intensive care unit requiring plasmapheresis with platelet counts consistently below 20 000/µL secondary to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). The patient had experienced agitated delirium requiring treatment, which was complicated by electrocardiogram (EKG) findings of a prolonged QTc interval. The antipsychotics the patient was receiving were believed to be responsible and, as such, the team desired an option that would have a lesser chance of worsening QTc (baseline-corrected QT) interval. Olanzapine was chosen and given IV versus the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved parenteral route of intramuscular (IM) due to concern of bleeding. The patient's delirious state responded to treatment to varying degrees and showed no increase in EKG abnormalities. To our knowledge, there is a paucity of published literature regarding this route of administration. Conclusion: Intramuscular olanzapine used IV may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of acutely agitated, delirious, critically ill patient.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess activity of the combination of ceftriaxone and ampicillin against clinical isolates of ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium. METHODS: Ampicillin-susceptible E. faecium (n = 29) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 10) collected from locations in the USA and France were used for this analysis. Susceptibility testing was performed by gradient diffusion strip (GDS) and broth microdilution (BMD). Synergy with the combination of ceftriaxone and ampicillin was assessed in all isolates using GDS crossing and double disc diffusion methods. Selected isolates (nine E. faecium and three E. faecalis) were assessed for synergy in time-kill studies using ampicillin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone. RESULTS: In isolates of E. faecium, the median (range) ampicillin MIC by BMD was 0.5 (0.25-4) mg/L and by GDS it was 2 (1-8) mg/L. In E. faecalis, the median (range) ampicillin MIC by BMD was 0.5 (0.5-1) mg/L and by GDS it was 2 (0.75-3) mg/L. A total of 24/29 (82.8%) isolates of E. faecium displayed synergy by GDS and 22/29 (75.9%) by double disc diffusion. Seven of 10 (70%) isolates of E. faecalis displayed synergy by GDS and 4/10 (40%) by double disc diffusion. Time-kill studies found synergy in 3/9 (33.3%) E. faecium and 3/3 (100%) E. faecalis. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the demonstrated synergy in time-kill models of ceftriaxone and ampicillin for E. faecalis, this combination does not appear to provide uniform synergy in E. faecium. Antagonism was not observed. Clinical correlation is necessary and caution should be used when considering ampicillin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of infections caused by ampicillin-susceptible E. faecium.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis and septic shock represent common presentations in the emergency department (ED) and have high rates of mortality. Guideline-recommended goals of care have been shown to benefit these patients, but can be difficult to provide. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of a premixed bag consisting of 2 g cefepime and 1 g vancomycin in 1000 mL of normal saline increases the probability of patients receiving Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommendations for the initiation of antimicrobials and fluid challenge. METHODS: This was a 6-month retrospective analysis conducted to determine the impact of an intervention on time to antimicrobials and fluid administration in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Patients presenting to the ED who received a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock and were administered 2 antibiotics were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome assessed was compliance with SSC recommendations for antibiotic and fluid goals within 3 hours of ED arrival. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included. In the intervention group, 63.8% of patients met the primary outcome compared with 22.5% in the historical group (odds ratio = 2.32; 95% CI = 1.67-3.23). Time to administration of antibiotics was less with the combination antibiotic bag (CAB: median (IQR) = 72 (48-115) minutes; non-CAB: median (IQR) = 135 (102-244) minutes; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: This intervention significantly increased the proportion of patients provided with SSC goals of care. Such interventions have not been reported previously and could be meaningful in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)